Originally posted by Gideon
Indeed.Not because I think he'd win, mind you, but because I know next to nothing about Durron's skills other than his reputation amongst the Jedi (which isn't good enough to suggest that he'd do well against someone of Palpatine's caliber).
Could someone provide an argument either way, please?
hmm I think that it would be better if it was exar kun possesed Durron...
anyways, Durron has pretty pwnage lightning w/ exar kun, and has "black tendrils" that can cause people to go into a coma like state.
but then Idk that much about Durron.
guys whats with this "on topic" crap.. shouldn't that be obvious? cuz i thought someone was asking it as a joke, then The Ground actually gave a real answer..
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
On my authority that you're dicking up this thread by desperately trying to sound intelligent. From now on, stick to one word answers and see if TG can follow.
Nah.
If I'd been trying to sound intelligent I would have put the word 'respective' ... Oh damn. Clearly by using any vocabulary even marginally more exact than that allowed by 'leet speak' I am 'trying desperately' to sound intelligent.
Originally posted by The Ground
Yes.ABC RUELS!!!
Beg your pardon, but that is NOT ABC. ABC is when someone says something like-
A beat B who beat C so A will beat C.
That is to say they don't provide context. They don't explain WHY 'A' will win.
I did not ABC anything because I did provide context. I stated that Yoda has been a Jedi Master for over eight centuries. That means he has skill and expertise. I then pointed out that Kyp does not have those.
Originally posted by chilled monkeyHe was being glib.
Beg your pardon, but that is NOT ABC. ABC is when someone says something like-A beat B who beat C so A will beat C.
That is to say they don't provide context. They don't explain WHY 'A' will win.
I did not ABC anything because I did provide context. I stated that Yoda has been a Jedi Master for over eight centuries. That means he has skill and expertise. I then pointed out that Kyp does not have those.
Originally posted by chilled monkey
Beg your pardon, but that is NOT ABC. ABC is when someone says something like-A beat B who beat C so A will beat C.
That is to say they don't provide context. They don't explain WHY 'A' will win.
I did not ABC anything because I did provide context. I stated that Yoda has been a Jedi Master for over eight centuries. That means he has skill and expertise. I then pointed out that Kyp does not have those.
Read your post several times until you understand that it was ABC. Or to save some time and strain on your eyes:
Palpatine(A) matches Yoda.(B)
Yoda(B) has more expertise and skill than Kyp(C) so Yoda would win that fight.
If you follow the chain you will see that A is slightly better than B, and B is better than C.
However, this is simply how I interpreted it. It may not be what you intended to post, but I agree with you. Who cares. And to branch off, Kyp is not Mace or Yoda, so he can't win.