Originally posted by quanchi112
Cease and desist the bashing. It just shows I got to you and how seriously you take the internet.
no my friend. the fact that you can be here nearly 24/7 and continue to argue ad nauseam about one fictional character and his connections in particular and have been doing it for years proves how seriously YOU take the internet and how every1 gets to YOU. orrrr did you not know that QUAN has become sumwhat of a secondhand reference on kmc.
Originally posted by leonheartmmI am not here 24/7. I wasn't here for about a week straight and have taken weeks off. My presence is awesome though as you feel I am here 24/7.
no my friend. the fact that you can be here nearly 24/7 and continue to argue ad nauseam about one fictional character and his connections in particular and have been doing it for years proves how seriously YOU take the internet and how every1 gets to YOU. orrrr did you not know that QUAN has become sumwhat of a secondhand reference on kmc.
I don't take these matters to heart. I have fun while I am here, but don't hold personal vendettas against posters regardless of how heated the debates get.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I am not here 24/7. I wasn't here for about a week straight and taken weeks OFF . My presence is awesome though as you feel I am here 24/7.I don't take these matters to heart. I have fun while I am here, but don't hold personal vendettas against posters regardless of how heated the debates get.
lol, that alone shows that you consider this an actual occupation. and no, your bullshit is awesome so it takes forever to sieve through, making one feal like even an abnormal person wud have to be here constantly to produce that much of it.
Originally posted by leonheartmmSo, because I can tell you that I took a week off straight that means this is my job? Or does that mean that I know what I am doing and recently wasn't here for a week straight.
lol, that alone shows that you consider this an actual occupation. and no, your bullshit is awesome so it takes forever to sieve through, making one feal like even an abnormal person wud have to be here constantly to produce that much of it.
You have been here since 2004 and your comic knowledge is well behind the curve.
^2003, and just because i left the comic vs thread generally due to distaste for fanboys and idiots in general doesnt mean i stopped reading comics, and a much larger collection than you are probably even aware of for that matter.
the fact that you refer to it as a week OFF means that you consider this your job. me, i say ive been only back here for half aweek half heartedly after years of general avoidance. i was bored. see the difference.
Originally posted by leonheartmmOct 6th, 2004
^2003, and just because i left the comic vs thread generally due to distaste for fanboys and idiots in general doesnt mean i stopped reading comics, and a much larger collection than you are probably even aware of for that matter.the fact that you refer to it as a week OFF means that you consider this your job. me, i say ive been only back here for half aweek half heartedly after years of general avoidance. i was bored. see the difference.
You don't even know the date with which you signed up for. 😂
No, it just means a week off of this site Mr. 2003.
Originally posted by leonheartmmWho says that the skrull version of Black Bolt's power went up to scale at the same rate as normal Black Bolt?
i denied that they cud make a skrull with power LEVEL of BB and i maintain that, stop lying.and you just contradicted yourself four times there.
AGAIN, either they CAN replicate the power of blackbolt fully{which is the only way the character in question cud have blasted world war hulk away with a mere whisper} and my argument of hulk being subdued by a mere whisper from blackbolt being untrue REMAINS.
or i was wrong initially to begin with by trying to guage blackbolt's power, and infact the skrulls can NOT replicate the full power of blackbolt{which wud be necessary for the feat in question}.
pick one quan, and stop faltering over each succesive statement you make.
Maybe the power output he demonstrated against WWH is his max. Maybe it isn't. The fact that skrull bolt did something within the power range of normal Black Bolt does not at all indicate that he was capable of Black Bolt's max.
And whispers from Black Bolt have done a hell of a lot more than blow WWH away. The phrase "a mere whisper", as you use, is ludicrous.
You have no idea what you're talking about, and are trying to loosely draw together supposition based on one feat of a known skrull, to attempt to say that that's a feat for another character- the basic concept of what you're trying to accomplish is utterly retarded.
The fact that you have to resort to childish spaz's about the semantics between "replicate" and "genetically engineer" (which are NOT mutually exclusive terms... one can be genetically engineered with the intention to replicate, and a replica need not match it's original in power/stature/size to be considered a replica), displays how you're devoid of any semblance of logic, reason or coherent argument.
So, anyways, you're wrong.
Please leave.
Originally posted by Original Smurph
Who says that the skrull version of Black Bolt's power went up to scale at the same rate as normal Black Bolt?Maybe the power output he demonstrated against WWH is his max. Maybe it isn't. The fact that skrull bolt did something within the power range of normal Black Bolt does not at all indicate that he was capable of Black Bolt's max.
And whispers from Black Bolt have done a hell of a lot more than blow WWH away. The phrase "a mere whisper", as you use, is ludicrous.
You have no idea what you're talking about, and are trying to loosely draw together supposition based on one feat of a known skrull, to attempt to say that that's a feat for another character- the basic concept of what you're trying to accomplish is utterly retarded.
The fact that you have to resort to childish spaz's about the semantics between "replicate" and "genetically engineer" (which are NOT mutually exclusive terms... one can be genetically engineered with the intention to replicate, and a replica need not match it's original in power/stature/size to be considered a replica), displays how you're devoid of any semblance of logic, reason or coherent argument.
So, anyways, you're wrong.
Please leave.
but your argument is based on MAYBEs without positive evidence while mine is based on inconsistant retcons. so your wrong.