One Year On ...

Started by Sadako of Girth24 pages

I reckon you're right.

It began on film.

What would have made me laugh, would have been if he went in for the liberals, instead of the predictable Neo Conservative image that a terminator belies.

Originally posted by queeq
And still, T2 was by far superior to T3.

Hell even T4 is better then T3.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well I guess 'baddie' is a relative term is what Cameron tried to imply in the next movie. Good 'morals and machines' point. But the fewer deaths/lighter tone detracted somewhat, for me.

And also the Tin Man finally got a heart as Cameron says it.

Yeah... right. T was not a Tin Man... he was a robot with a strict programme.

Indeed.

Connor just programmed him.

To be a dick.

Hehehe

Originally posted by queeq
Yeah... right. T was not a Tin Man... he was a robot with a strict programme.

Totally was'nt the point........

Cameron on changing the tone for Terminator 2-

The Terminator associated with being a killing machine this is his purpose in life. Devoid of any emotion, remorse, or any kind of human social order he suddenly finds himself in a strange dilemma of his career. He can't kill anybody and he does'nt know why. He's got to figure it out.....So the Tin Man gets his heart

Still, it doesn't make sense. How can a programmed machine have ANY dilemma? Don't get me wrong, I like T2 a lot, but this humanization of machines is a major pitfall. Spielberg didn't get it right in AI, neither did Cameron in T2. He kinda ruined the very thing that made T1 such a succes. T was the robo equivalent of the shark in Jaws... you just don;t want to shark having feelings or a heart now, do you?

HAL in 2001 was a good example of how programming conflicted with the response of it's users. But HAL didn't have a heart, he just did was he was told and didn't understand why Dave turned against him.

Originally posted by queeq
Still, it doesn't make sense. How can a programmed machine have ANY dilemma? Don't get me wrong, I like T2 a lot, but this humanization of machines is a major pitfall.

First of all skynet did'nt re-programmed the T-101 thats in T2 it was Future John that did the re-programming and the John in the past is the one that started teaching it the emotions

T was the robo equivalent of the shark in Jaws... you just don;t want to shark having feelings or a heart now, do you?

Obvisouly no........but with the Termi in T2 its explain how and shown how its manage to start learning its emotions rather then automatically resort back to its killer insticts that Skynet programs them with.

A machinen CANNOT have emotions... it can only simulate them. That's the whole point. And it doesn't matter WHO programmed him, the point is: it's a machine, it runs only by its programme.

Yeah Queeqs right.

The learn mode of the CPU was just so it could be allowed to function away from Skynet's command etc.

It is not to be confused with Data's emotion chip from ST.

T2: "I know now why you cry.. ..but it is something I can never do."

That line definitely suggests that his was an intellectual understanding of the Human facet, but not being human, he could not do likewise...being without emotion.

Yup

Leaving them very Vulcanesque.

I wouldn't want it any other way.

The only way I can think to improve it is to throw in Jolene Blalock from the Mirror universe enterprise episode, fighting/lezzing off with Megan Fox in a vat of yogurt.

You need a girl friend.

Whats that line from Jurassic Park...?

"Im always on the lookout for a future ex-missus-Sadako."

😛

😂

So you're a fervent proponent of chaos?

Looks like it.

Quantum Physics seems to agree with it to, so hell. Why not...?