Were Dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?

Originally posted by Quark_666
because American Mormons like to believe what Americans believe and what Mormons believe......it doesn't change theology of Mormonism any more than it changes the culture of America.

true, but it makes u wonder if mormonism isnt just a newer age extension of american and new frontier mythology mixed with the mainstream relegion that survived in society.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
true, but it makes u wonder if mormonism isnt just a newer age extension of american and new frontier mythology mixed with the mainstream relegion that survived in society.

So has anyone actually seen the supposed remains of Noah's Ark?

You would of thought something that vindicates something in the Bible would have been world wide 24hr news.

Or it was a load of rubbish, proven scientifically to be rubbish and forgotten about as...you guessed it....a load of rubbish.

Originally posted by Beliver
So has anyone actually seen the supposed remains of Noah's Ark?

You would of thought something that vindicates something in the Bible would have been world wide 24hr news.

Or it was a load of rubbish, proven scientifically to be rubbish and forgotten about as...you guessed it....a load of rubbish.

Faith does not need remains. 😉

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Faith does not need remains. 😉

But it does make your evidence a little more credible.

Originally posted by Beliver
But it does make your evidence a little more credible.

That is true, if evidence is important.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That is true, if evidence is important.

You catch more flys with some poo on a stick than the stick on its own.

Originally posted by Beliver
You catch more flys with some poo on a stick than the stick on its own.

Not true. You can use a poo-less stick to beat people until they catch flies for you.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Not true. You can use a poo-less stick to beat people until they catch flies for you.

😂

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Not true. You can use a poo-less stick to beat people until they catch flies for you.

Kind of how the Bible was used in the Dark ages?

Belive or Die.....

Basically, but there was also a lot of poo in the Dark Ages.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Not true. You can use a poo-less stick to beat people until they catch flies for you.

Getting away from the subject of poo and sticks...

If there is no evidence then the events depicted in the bible surrounding the "Noah's Ark" incident, are purely anecdotal (chinese whipsers passed down over the centuries) at best or just plain made up hogwash.

Perhaps Noah recieved Extraterrestrial help from teachers from above. Alot of the Bible is broken and many chapters are missing like for example the Book of Enoch. The most important book is missing because it explains the Human/ Reptilian Giants (Gods ) that came to earth and had an influence to Mankind.

I believe the story of Noah is real but it's is an ancient Babylonian story transfered to the Bible.

So if these Giants existed Noah would have no problem finding most of the animals that can live with Humans. Dinosaurs were not included in the list , but this planet is truly vast so I don't think the Flood was global.

Originally posted by Beliver
Getting away from the subject of poo and sticks...

If there is no evidence then the events depicted in the bible surrounding the "Noah's Ark" incident, are purely anecdotal (chinese whipsers passed down over the centuries) at best or just plain made up hogwash.

Well first off, you can account for multiple, similar flood legends in that area at that time...outside of the bible.

Secondly, again your logic is flawed. History is all anecdotal. You don't doubt aspects of Roman history, even though all the evidence we have of this is anecdotal...written accounts from very biased individuals.

It seems to me, you're more interested in portraying religion and the Bible as invalid, rather than proving its points of invalidity. You should go read the Creation vs Evolution thread. There's some great examples in there of how people will go to any length to prove their ideology (even in point of fact).

Frankly I think it just makes them look ridiculous.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That is true, if evidence is important.

Shakyamunison, am i to assume that you are a believer, not specifically christianity?

your comments are mostly founded on historical account, be tangible proof or main stream beliefs passed down from generation to generation.

however your last to comments are that of a faith based believer, do you follow the teachings of buddah or are you using it as a signature for decorative purposes?

i am not insulting i am really curious. as you have not yet bashed any person as far as i can see.

Originally posted by KYamato
Shakyamunison, am i to assume that you are a believer, not specifically christianity?

your comments are mostly founded on historical account, be tangible proof or main stream beliefs passed down from generation to generation.

however your last to comments are that of a faith based believer, do you follow the teachings of buddah or are you using it as a signature for decorative purposes?

i am not insulting i am really curious. as you have not yet bashed any person as far as i can see.

He's a coffee shop Buddhist 🙂

Originally posted by KYamato
Shakyamunison, am i to assume that you are a believer, not specifically christianity?

your comments are mostly founded on historical account, be tangible proof or main stream beliefs passed down from generation to generation.

however your last to comments are that of a faith based believer, do you follow the teachings of buddah or are you using it as a signature for decorative purposes?

i am not insulting i am really curious. as you have not yet bashed any person as far as i can see.

😂

Originally posted by Ordo
😂