Jinzin vs OneDumbG0 Proof of FTB or FTL reflexes

Started by Tha C-Master5 pages

Originally posted by jinzin
there's a big surprise. 🙄 😂 hey man what's up?
Bout to do some training for a belt test coming up in August.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Bout to do some training for a belt test coming up in August.
What MA?

which belt? which discipline?

It's a new style made by my current master. You haven't heard of it before, it's called Tao Hsieh Wu Shu, the way of unified martial arts. It's a Mixed Martial Arts that includes Ninpo, Ju Juitsu, some wrestling, Tae Kwon Do, etc. It is a non profit style with 7 belts. You start off at no belt and go white, yellow, orange, green, blue, red, and black. Then you have 2nd, 3rd, and 4th which is master, we progress slowly as it is non profit so we don't have the need to advance fast for things like rent. I've been in it 2 years and I'm training for blue. I'm actually the fastest advancer thus far. I cut my leg open doing my landscaping company so I took a few months off and it delayed my green belt, all for the better probably though. We test only 4x a year.

I guess the coolest thing about my instructor/friend is that he was going to play Leo in the TMNT2 movie but he didn't get his paperwork in on time, I always thought it was cool to be trained by my favorite character in my favorite movie. 🙂

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ggama/TaoHsiehWuShu
http://www.warriors-for-christ.com/index.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PndlwwTgbRc

Originally posted by jinzin
I was of course referring to what's generaly accepted by the scientific community I understand full well it's a theory, that wasn't the point.

I understand what proof I'm burdoned with here, I don't see how it's not been proven.

I don't have the time to actually get drawn into this debate, something which discussing why I feel the point has not been proven would inevitably lead to. The gist of what I feel is that you need to specifically prove that your scans illustrate FtB/FtL reflexes, and not require ODG to show that the feats can be interpreted as aim-dodging etc, because of the fact that you need to substantiate a claim, while he does not need to illustrate the inability of a claim to stand on its own feet. I don't think that it was accomplished at all. That isn't down to you being a poor debater, but is rather due to the difficult motion.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
What a suprise...wow.

yea and you fallowing me and commenting on every little post I make is such a surprize as well 🙄