Originally posted by FE ExpertTrue, but it's horrendously subjective. In mine, for example, she doesn't down anybody. She just kinda stands there. And that's on Elite. We really can't use her for anything.
To base one's skill on the game mechanics of the sole source is better than no source.And I thought some sort of clone sniper killed her...
Originally posted by Slash_KMC
To conclude, she just isn't a character you easily use in Versus threads.
Just like Stam (or Naat) Reath...
Unless there is a better source than SW Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns for either of these, it's the only source one has.
Anyway, back on the topic. Since both know the ins and outs of the royal palace, it's really who shoots first...
Originally posted by FE Expert
Just like Stam (or Naat) Reath...Unless there is a better source than SW Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns for either of these, it's the only source one has.
Anyway, back on the topic. Since both know the ins and outs of the royal palace, it's really who shoots first...
Originally posted by FE ExpertWe're not talking about whether the character did what she did, we're saying how she did it is what doesn't count. My friend played that game, she killed him. I played it, she just stood there. Such subjective, random occurrences are not canon, ever. All we can say is that she took part in the battle, and little else. Game mechanics are never canon, even a little bit.
A gameplay mechanical source is better than no source.If, for a character (i.e. Apailana, Stam/Naat Reath), the only source you got was a RTS game, would you dismiss it?