TPM Amidala vs. Apailana

Started by Eminence2 pages

Originally posted by FE Expert
A gameplay mechanical source is better than no source.
No, it isn't.

FE Expert
If, for a character (i.e. Apailana, Stam/Naat Reath), the only source you got was a RTS game, would you dismiss it?
Yeah...

This is one reason why we have "unknowns" here, and why many members try to avoid encouraging the use of such characters.

Originally posted by FE Expert
A gameplay mechanical source is better than no source.

If, for a character (i.e. Apailana, Stam/Naat Reath), the only source you got was a RTS game, would you dismiss it?

Stam's only feat is getting killed by Sev'rance while Naat her only one is getting captured by Sev'rance. I didn't use them once in maps because they were weak and when they died I got pissed.

No source > Gameplay source.

Battlefront 2 is an AWESOME game, but there's some errors in it's credibility:

Rancors invincible???????
Wampas having jedi powers??????????
Wookies having better HP/armor than ARMORED troops????????
Galactic marines being called clone commanders????????
Yoda being weak????????
Darth Maul being super pwnage????????
The Jedi Temple's layout being severely messed up????????????
etc...

But yeah there aren't enough credible sources to determine the winner of this battle, so I'd say that it's just luck.

well Amidala has used a blaster quite often, (Geonosis, TPM like all fight scenes) etc.

and idk anything about Apailana so yeah.

Would Apailana be somehow targeted by the credibility errors?