Originally posted by Robtard
Well, if this is Clooney-Bat, then it's safe to say he has one of these for himself and Robin-boy in the ole Batcave.
I'm a big fan of Batman but I say IM takes this. Stark's suit can withstand a ton of damage, fly as fast or faster then an F-22 and can deal more damage than any of Batman's gadgets/vehicles put together.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
As long as Iron Man takes Robin out too, its all good.
Considering that Robin could withstand the G-Forces of being rocket towards space at escape velocity(with out the conventional safety equipment mind you) and the strength to hold onto and climb a space ship that was doing so. Indicates that he could attach himself to Iron-Man via grapple or similiar means and hold on no matter how much Iron-Man tried to lose him and once up close with Stark he might even have the strength to take apart his armor by hand and even if he can't do it by hand he can cut threw it with his cutting torch laser tool.
Originally posted by Robtard
Hahahahahaaa, no. Good attempt though, was a bit funny.IM will be airborne, firing down.
I'll admit it is a bit of long shot, but given superior knowledge of the terrain and being in and urban setting with high building and such. If Batman was leading Iron-man on a chase, say in the Batmobile. Robin might have an oppotunity to attach a graple or even just jump on him as he passes. Again it is addmitedly a bit of a long shot, but given some of the stuff that Batman and Robin pulled off, not completly out of the question.
Originally posted by Robtard
You stick to your "long shot", I'll stick to IM's superior technology and firepower winning the day. 🙂
And how much of that fire power do you think that Tony is going to bust out in an occupied urban center(remember everybody knows he is Iron-Man)? How much of that fire power is he going to use if he is in a building or other structure that can collapse. Etc etc. Most of Tony's advantages can be negated by Batman using the enviroment(an enviroment he will know better by the way) to his advantage. Even flight will be of little use in confined spaces. Batman is also far more combat and tacticaly minded then Stark. In this scenario. He also holds the above noted home field advantage.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I really dont see how Batman makes this even the slightest challenge for IM.
Batman seemed to have a better head for strategy and tactics. He also has the homefield advantage. Is possible more ruthless. His stealth abilities should he use them would allow him to steal stuff from Stark. Whose Iron-Man identity is public knowledge.
Even a straight up fight isn't as one sided as some seem to think. Between the Batmobile, the Batwing, and his own hitting power Batman can hurt Iron-Man. Even outside his vehicles his durability would allow him to take blows from Iron-Man. Batman has after all walked off multi-story falls, plane wrecks, being smashed threw huge neon sign at helicopter speeds, massed gun fire etc.
As touched on in an earlier post. Ambush's are an option. Such as force him to fly after somebody. Dodging between buildings and what not. Then using a combination of gliders, graples, and the climbing devices from "Batman and Robin". Get on top of Iron-Man and pound on him or hit him, explosives or cutting tools etc. Batman could even catch Tony on a grapple and attach the other end to the Batmobile and pulls against him. Batman could even bait Iron-Man into fighting in a subway tunnel or similiar structure and then run him down with one or multiple Batmobiles.
Originally posted by Nightstick
And how much of that fire power do you think that Tony is going to bust out in an occupied urban center(remember everybody knows he is Iron-Man)? How much of that fire power is he going to use if he is in a building or other structure that can collapse. Etc etc. Most of Tony's advantages can be negated by Batman using the enviroment(an enviroment he will know better by the way) to his advantage. Even flight will be of little use in confined spaces. Batman is also far more combat and tacticaly minded then Stark. In this scenario. He also holds the above noted home field advantage.
Just enough fire-power to shoot Robin and blast the Batmobile, they'll be minimal collateral damage.
Still don't understand what you're going on about, really, IM wins here. Now, if it was Baleman, that dude is a ****ing ninja.
Originally posted by NightstickI haven't seen evidence that confirms this. Stark is pretty tactically minded to have to build his various armors. He's far smarter, stronger, faster, and more durable than Bat-family. His equipment is better as well. J.A.R.V.I.S., Jericho missiles, influence in USAF(Rhodey). His damn house is more impressive than Bruce's Batcave in any of the films.
Batman is also far more combat and tacticaly minded then Stark.
If you added Nolan's Batman to this you MIGHT make it interesting. The only advantage I see Batman having is if the fight goes in the sea. Stark has yet to show us a Deep-Sea Diving Armor or if his suit can go submerged. But I think one shot with a repulsor to any Bat-member and they're dead. Batmobile's gone b/c of the anti-tank missile the size of a freakin sharpie. Airborne Bats is out the game for the simple fact that Stark encountered two F-22 Raptors and wasn't even fighting them. He was trying to avoid them. F-22>>>Batman's aircraft shown in '89/'95.
Homecourt advantage? Don't see how that helps when Iron Man fly's you off the Earth.