Darth Maul vs Darth Vader

Started by lebowski323 pages

Darth Maul vs Darth Vader

Which of these legendary Sith lords wins in a lightsaber duel?

SW forum, dude.

Both are however movie characters. So it's allowed here isnt it?

Nope. In the forum rules you'll see that Impediment forbids SW matches here. They go here:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f86/

Hmm yep you're right. Oh well shit happens.

Mhm. And I am certain Vader versus Maul has been done there already.

ROTS Vader or OT Vader? Either way Vader wins.

it was a done in a comic and vader won in the most epic way possible.

OT Vader would lose to Maul only counting movies.

estahuh

YouTube video

Originally posted by NemeBro
OT Vader would lose to Maul only counting movies.
Reasoning?

Vader...he survived more than one movie awesome

Originally posted by Darth Martin
Reasoning?
Vader is slow.

Okay, I just saw that this was a strict lightsaber duel. Vader still has a good chance.

Originally posted by WO Polaski
it was a done in a comic and vader won in the most epic way possible.

Originally posted by steverules_2
Vader...he survived more than one movie awesome

Vaders elite with a lightsaber... Maul is too but vader would still win.

I dunno man, Maul is pretty ****ing fast. Vader never displayed speed close to Maul's. Plus Maul has two blades.

But if it is Vader before he is pwned by Obi Wan in ROTS, you know, pre-armor Vader, then Vader pwns.

Vader as vader still owns. Maul is fast I agree, but he is a lil more careless than Vader would be. And you gotta keep in mind that Vader was also slow becuase thsi movie was made in the 80's.

Maul isn't as careless as people make him out to be. I have a theory on the fight he had with Qui Gon and Obi Wan. Dunno if you wanna hear it.

He wasnt careless as people think? Dude yes he was. LOL even in the extended SW universe beyond movies it prooves this even more but anyways. He was pretty careless and he'd **** up and vader would shred him apart. Maul would put up one hell of a fight tho