Originally posted by NemeBro OT Vader would lose to Maul only counting movies.
Reasoning?
STE
steverules_2Senior Member
Vader...he survived more than one movie awesome
NEM
NemeBroSenior Member
Originally posted by Darth Martin Reasoning?
Vader is slow.
DM
Darth MartinSenior Member
Okay, I just saw that this was a strict lightsaber duel. Vader still has a good chance.
BRU
BruceSkywalkerThe BatLord of the Jedi
Originally posted by WO Polaski it was a done in a comic and vader won in the most epic way possible.
Originally posted by steverules_2 Vader...he survived more than one movie awesome
KAI
KaibsOh Miley.
Vaders elite with a lightsaber... Maul is too but vader would still win.
RJ
Rogue JediRestricted
I dunno man, Maul is pretty ****ing fast. Vader never displayed speed close to Maul's. Plus Maul has two blades.
But if it is Vader before he is pwned by Obi Wan in ROTS, you know, pre-armor Vader, then Vader pwns.
KAI
KaibsOh Miley.
Vader as vader still owns. Maul is fast I agree, but he is a lil more careless than Vader would be. And you gotta keep in mind that Vader was also slow becuase thsi movie was made in the 80's.
RJ
Rogue JediRestricted
Maul isn't as careless as people make him out to be. I have a theory on the fight he had with Qui Gon and Obi Wan. Dunno if you wanna hear it.
KAI
KaibsOh Miley.
He wasnt careless as people think? Dude yes he was. LOL even in the extended SW universe beyond movies it prooves this even more but anyways. He was pretty careless and he'd **** up and vader would shred him apart. Maul would put up one hell of a fight tho