Superman and Batman vs. Hulk and Ironman

Started by carver94 pages
Originally posted by Darth Martin
Superman 10/10.

Naah, 8/10 due to bfring, i think hulk could prevent most of the bfring.

Superman/Batman.

Originally posted by carver9
Superman and batman 8/10, take out bfring and we'll have a fight.

doesn't really make that much of a difference... shrug

Originally posted by Raoul
doesn't really make that much of a difference... shrug

to me it does make a difference since I think that Hulk>Supes physically.

Originally posted by carver9
to me it does make a difference since I think that Hulk>Supes physically.

even if that were true, he's still lacking when it comes to speed by more of a gap than supes would in terms of strength.

thats assuming hulk was even able to get that angry.

Originally posted by carver9
Hulk>Supes physically.
😗

Originally posted by Raoul
even if that were true, he's still lacking when it comes to speed by more of a gap than supes would in terms of strength.

thats assuming hulk was even able to get that angry.

I agree supes has a speed edge but cis is on and supes would fight on a level that would get him wrecked by hulk.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
😗

Feats proves this along with supes being knocked the hell out by hulk like beings and being far less than hulk

Originally posted by carver9
I agree supes has a speed edge but cis is on and supes would fight on a level that would get him wrecked by hulk.

why? superman and hulk trade punches for a while, then superman realises he has to work harder to put down hulk, and starts using his speed in addition to his strength.

that's with CIS on.

Originally posted by carver9
Feats proves this along with supes being knocked the hell out by hulk like beings and being far less than hulk
Who?

Originally posted by carver9
to me it does make a difference since I think that Hulk>Supes physically.

Savage hulk?

are you serious

^ I don't know why that comes as a shock to so many.

Superman isn't the be-all and end-all of strength-based characters.

Originally posted by Enyalus
^ I don't know why that comes as a shock to so many.

Superman isn't the be-all and end-all of strength-based characters.

still trying to get majestic some much needed respect, are we?

Originally posted by carver9
to me it does make a difference since I think that Hulk>Supes physically.

We all make mistakes, just try to learn from it and move on.

Originally posted by Enyalus
^ I don't know why that comes as a shock to so many.

Superman isn't the be-all and end-all of strength-based characters.

he's not, but savage hulk without being extremly angry is no where close

Originally posted by grimify
We all make mistakes, just try to learn from it and move on.
😆

[QUOTE=12065966]Originally posted by Raoul
[B]why? superman and hulk trade punches for a while, then superman realises he has to work harder to put down hulk, and starts using his speed in addition to his strength.

that's with CIS on.

HMMM, it would be kind of late then because supes would be fighting a much more stonger, faster, more durable hulk. Without bfring, supes lose.

Originally posted by jalek moye
Savage hulk?

are you serious

UMMM, savage hulk at calm stated lifted a mountain over his head, 150 billion tons. Yes, I'm referring to savage hulk.

Originally posted by carver9
[QUOTE=12065966]Originally posted by Raoul
[B]why? superman and hulk trade punches for a while, then superman realises he has to work harder to put down hulk, and starts using his speed in addition to his strength.

that's with CIS on.

HMMM, it would be kind of late then because supes would be fighting a much more stonger, faster, more durable hulk. Without bfring, supes lose.

no matter how fast hulk gets, he's not going to be as fast as superman.

and imo, superman can lost long enough against any hulk, no matter how strong or durable.

Originally posted by Raoul
still trying to get majestic some much needed respect, are we?

Nah, I like him being underrated. If he was popular, I probably wouldn't like him.

It's just that, like you admitted before, strengthwise feat for feat it could be argued either way and is nowhere near clear cut. So when I see someone going, "OMG r u serious!?!" It's like...yes, he is. Get over it. 😛

Though, like Phil said before, "people don't understand that strength isn't the reason that Hulk loses to Superman."