Originally posted by quanchi112
Yeah, I just read it. What a moron. Lois would never have to know. What happens in asgard stays in asgard. This is part of the reason I'll never like the guy. He's such a boy scout and he refused to kill any of the demons also which made me sick.
i don't mind him refusing to kill the demons. its part of his character. refusing to bang diana though... i mean wtf.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I know. It's just he refused to kill these demons. What a boy scout. WW had no hesitation.
refusing to kill people doesn't make you a boyscout, demon or not.
Originally posted by james2099
Superman is not a skilled fighter..... Cain is a brawler, a get down and dirty fighter. Superman does not have what it takes without his powers, lex luthor, a regular human beat pre-crisis superman azz in a fist fight... A book you might have never seen when supes lost his powers and was just like a regular human.... not like a regular alien who may be stronger than a human. They are no different than humans.
pre crisis? christ, you really are reaching.
post crisis superman, which is the one in this thread, did beat lex luthor in a fist fight even after soaking up a whole bunch of kryptonite.
Originally posted by james2099
You shall have it. But i have to go through enough comicbooks to cover an entire semi... Trailer and all. And my brother has more than me, so he may have that issue. Just like the one where cyclops blasted through adamantium... I still have to get raoul on that one.
i never said cyclops could blast through adamantium. 🤨
also:
i'm not getting ultimate alliance 2 unless cyclops is in it. 🙁
As a side note, glads cant fight at light speed either but he does have
some on panel proof of him bullrushing at light speed (still not fighting
though). The only person that I can think of that actually have any kind
of credibility of fighting and reacting at light speed is surfer, flash, northstar,
and runner (know its a lot more than that) but supes and glads, its all KMC
speculation and is also a fanned based judgement.
Originally posted by RaoulBoth are within his character. I get it. He's in love with one woman and will do the right thing and only kill in certain circumstances. I like a hero that will kill a badguy.
i don't mind him refusing to kill the demons. its part of his character. refusing to bang diana though... i mean wtf.refusing to kill people doesn't make you a boyscout, demon or not.
pre crisis? christ, you really are reaching.
post crisis superman, which is the one in this thread, did beat lex luthor in a fist fight even after soaking up a whole bunch of kryptonite.
i never said cyclops could blast through adamantium. 🤨
also:
i'm not getting ultimate alliance 2 unless cyclops is in it. 🙁
Originally posted by quanchi112
Both are within his character. I get it. He's in love with one woman and will do the right thing and only kill in certain circumstances. I like a hero that will kill a badguy.
Agreed... but i'll take WW over lois any day of the week 😄 Might be death by snoo snoo by the end of that week but w/e...
Originally posted by carver9
raoul, we've already discussed this.
we did. and i'm right. shrug
Originally posted by quanchi112
Both are within his character. I get it. He's in love with one woman and will do the right thing and only kill in certain circumstances. I like a hero that will kill a badguy.
and i like a hero that has some standards. 😛
plus, he'd spent a thousand years with diana. he'd forgotten many things about lois. even mxy was on his case about that one.
Originally posted by Lord Feron
Agreed... but i'll take WW over lois any day of the week 😄 Might be death by snoo snoo by the end of that week but w/e...
preaching to the choir my friend.
Originally posted by Enyalus
Yeah, your fan Superman/Darkseid battle was a little creepy in that department...
a man can't ogle? uhuh
also, this is great, coming from the guy who said:
Originally posted by Enyalus
I wasn't knocking ya for it, Phil. I mean, whatever does it for you.For me, it's children under 14 and large cats. For you, probably sheep. To each their own.