Holy thread revivals, batman.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You obviously subscribe to homo economicus to the max.Given your recent "adventures" that's a very wise way to go about your life.
Never-mind the seemingly contradictive "reciprocity" presents to the exchange of money for goods. But to say that would be to miss the point. The "homo economicus" comes into play, very succinctly, but not wanting to pay the waiter beyond that cost of your meal: AKA, maximum benefit for the least amount of investment.
So, really, I think this entire topic is not about a specific preference on a social/cultural activity, but rather, a discussion of microeconomic governance. Those contradicting your perspective subscribe to homo reciprocans and/or rational choice theory. (I think prospective theory is pretty damn spot on, myself. I subscribe to a mixture of theories rather than one single one. Humans are far too complex to pin down to a specific and small set of behaviors.)
But, I have a devious philosophical opinion of homo reciprocans being another flavor of homo economicus and RCT.
What I said is obviously debatable, to the max, but lots of what I said is pretty spot on.
I don't remember typing all of this post. I had no idea that I referenced Prospective Theory on KMC, before.