Wolverine 2 movie

Originally posted by -Pr-
Slade also did 30 Days of Night.

That was good, I am just ragging on him because hes part of that Twilight gayness.

Heres another Director getting thrown around Darren Aronofsky

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/106413-wolverine-2-director-rumors-surface

is moving forward with a script from Christopher McQuarrie (The Usual Suspects, Valkyrie)

i just want to see lots of good fights with the silver samurai

Should be Hugh Jackman's swan song with the role, after 10+ years.

At least they got someone good for the script this time and now just have to wait and see who they get for the director.

http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=28699

Apparantly Darren Aronofsky is in talks to do this sequel......if it all turns out true....WTF?? mess the first movie up but do a really good of the sequel.

http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2010/10/19/jackman-aronofskys-wolverine-2-will-be-fantastic-very-different/

Aronofsky's too good for this shit.

Well will soon know if Aronofsky can do a movie such as this since he's mostly done drama's and drama/Sci-fi.

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/110465-aronofsky-reveals-title-for-next-wolverine-movie

So its not gonna be a sequel to the Gavin Hood movie..

X-Men Origins Wolverine is to X-Men, as Highlander 2 is to Highlander.

"Let's pretend we didn't make a movie where the Highlanders were banished space aliens..."

Originally posted by srankmissingnin

"Let's pretend we didn't make a movie where the Highlanders were banished space aliens..."

Well they fixed that up with Highlander 2 with the directors cut.

The further they separate this film from the last, the better. The title, "The Wolverine," helps. I remain cautiously optimistic; I have faith in Aronofsky, but none in Fox.

Originally posted by SnakeEyes
The further they separate this film from the last, the better. The title, "The Wolverine," helps. I remain cautiously optimistic; I have faith in Aronofsky, but none in Fox.

My hope is that FOX will prevent Aronofsky from making it too melodramatic and pretentious, while Aronofsky will prevent FOX from making it a campy, poorly executed, convoluted mess that primary exists as a sales pitch for mutants not named Wolverine.

Should there be some kind of costume in this film? Now I know I'm going to get shot down for saying this (I did after I was unhappy with the X-Men 1 leather suits) but 'Wolverine' needs the costume, or some outfit that resembles it in some way. He needs to wear the mask as well because it's kind of boring seeing 'Logan' for 4 movies, wearing jeans , a vest and a leather jacket.

Hes in Japan, its too early for a costume.

Originally posted by The Nuul
Hes in Japan, its too early for a costume.

He could still have something that forms the basis for what he eventually uses in the future.

I reakon all the X-men could use the same costumes they do in the comics obvisouly just don't use spandex.

Logan will never wear yellow tights in movies. Just accept it people. Majority over comicbook geeks. If I see the costume ill say "Hey cool! He got his costume" zillions of other people all over the world will say "What he's gay now?"

Originally posted by SamZED
Logan will never wear yellow tights in movies. Just accept it people. Majority over comicbook geeks. If I see the costume ill say "Hey cool! He got his costume" zillions of other people all over the world will say "What he's gay now?"

Did I mention yellow and blue? It could be his orange and brown or some new costume, maybe black perhaps. It seems with your comment you seem inwardly embarrassed to like Wolverine in the first place if you are afraid of other people's reaction to it.