Originally posted by lil bitchiness
What were you watching? It is the most gruesome rape scene in a movie?
I was like, "meh." It was retardedly long. One take. 10 minutes. Too long.
And, real rape can be less violent or more violent. Some women end up with swollen faces from being beaten so bad.
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Unless you saw a whole lot of illegal rape porn and snuff movies, this may not be the worse you see, I guess.
Nah.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
According to Sankaku Complex (which isn't PG enough to link to) the UN is seriously considering it.Their source (http://www.asahi.com/national/update/0819/TKY200908190430.html) is in untranslated Japanese.
When did the UN get that type of power or mandate?
did world hunger just solve itself?
Originally posted by dadudemon
I was like, "meh." It was retardedly long. One take. 10 minutes. Too long.And, real rape can be less violent or more violent. Some women end up with swollen faces from being beaten so bad.
Then you watched the PG version.
Because after 10 mins of rape-****ing her up the ass while he's holding her mouth shut, insultting her and threatening to kill her if she 'shits on his dick', he gets up and proceeds to kick/stomp her face into a mass of bloody pulp.
BTW, he ****s her ass because 'that's how snobby bitches deserve it!' I also think he stomped her face in because she had the nerve to 'bleed on him.'
Hands down, worst rape-scene in a movie ever.
Originally posted by Robtardwell he didnt need to stomp her face... teh rest sounds acceptable 😉
Then you watched the PG version.Because after 10 mins of rape-****ing her up the ass while he's holding her mouth shut, insultting her and threatening to kill her if she 'shits on his dick', he gets up and proceeds to kick/stomp her face into a mass of bloody pulp.
BTW, he ****s her ass because 'that's how snobby bitches deserve it!'
Hands down, worst rape-scene in a movie ever.
Originally posted by Robtard
Then you watched the PG version.Because after 10 mins of rape-****ing her up the ass while he's holding her mouth shut, insultting her and threatening to kill her if she 'shits on his dick', he gets up and proceeds to kick/stomp her face into a mass of bloody pulp.
BTW, he ****s her ass because 'that's how snobby bitches deserve it!' I also think he stomped her face in because she had the nerve to 'bleed on him.'
Hands down, worst rape-scene in a movie ever.
I saw the same thing you did.
🙂
Originally posted by inimalist
When did the UN get that type of power or mandate?
CEDAW's existence probably gives them the "mandate". The economic downturn recession makes their ability to level sanctions that much more useful.
However I have no idea how reliable Sankaku Complex is and I can't actually read their link. Yes To Freedom makes it seem more like someone is trying to pressure the UN into doing this (in which case it could very well fail).
Originally posted by inimalist
did world hunger just solve itself?
World hunger might be harming people (though most studies suggest the opposite). Japanese pornography can empirically be shown to kill people.
No wait . . .
I've seen Japanese porn and I do admit....those guys have some bizzare, odd, and weird tastes and fetishes.
Truth be told...in all my years of watching all types of porn junk...I've never come accross child porn...I have my limits and won't venture into something I know is going to disturb me for the other half of my life.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I was like, "meh." It was retardedly long. One take. 10 minutes. Too long.And, real rape can be less violent or more violent. Some women end up with swollen faces from being beaten so bad.
Nah.
It seems you spectacularly missed the point of the scene.
It was supposed to be 'too long'. Because to victims of rape it seems like a horrific eternity.
It's the worst. I have never seen a rape scene even remotely come close to Irreversible's in regards to sheer plausibility and showing it as pure tragedy. In thanks to no small part to the amazing acting involved in the scene, and a very brilliant and daring director.
Originally posted by BackFire
It seems you spectacularly missed the point of the scene.
I didn't. I just didn't like that "artistic" style.
It's like delivering the same punch line 20 times.
Originally posted by BackFire
It was supposed to be 'too long'. Because to victims of rape it seems like a horrific eternity.
That may have been the point, but unlikely. More like, "look, we're artistic so we will make a rape scene from start to finish to show how cool our artistic expression is."
Originally posted by BackFire
It's the worst. I have never seen a rape scene even remotely come close to Irreversible's in regards to sheer plausibility and showing it as pure tragedy. In thanks to no small part to the amazing acting involved in the scene, and a very brilliant and daring director.
Cool. I was turned off by the film because of how long that rape scene was. It was...just, too long. Not because it was boring or stupid...it's beacuse I have the attention span of a gnat. There could have been other ways of doing it...that would be even more "artistic." They could have strapped a came to someone's head, added her voice to the back ground, and made it seem like you were the one being raped, based on the perspective. That's if they were trying to make it seem real. (I have other ideas, as well. You watch, I'll make a better rape scene in less than 2 minutes. 😐 )
That was the point. Director said so, it's common knowledge to anyone who has followed the film. The point was to make the scene as realistic and horrific as possible without any stupid or over the top gimmicks (which your suggestions would have been, and would have been comical and accidentally satirical, rather than powerful).
Originally posted by BackFire
It's the worst. I have never seen a rape scene even remotely come close to Irreversible's in regards to sheer plausibility and showing it as pure tragedy. In thanks to no small part to the amazing acting involved in the scene, and a very brilliant and daring director.
Exactly, scenes like the Deliverance male rape (which I hate to admit makes me laugh sometimes) and The Accused gang rape don't compare in how they draw you into the realness and horror of it.
Originally posted by BackFire
That was the point. Director said so, it's common knowledge to anyone who has followed the film. The point was to make the scene as realistic and horrific as possible without any stupid or over the top gimmicks (which your suggestions would have been, and would have been comical and accidentally satirical, rather than powerful).
Nah.
I didn't like it. Was too long. It was like telling the same punch line too many times.
The gimmick was playing the movie in "reverse."
My way would be better. 🙂
And, I can still think the scene was just another gimmick from where the director tried too hard to be "visceral" and ended up beating the scene into the ground (along with her head. 🙂 )
It's like having a shootout scene for 10 minutes straight where someone shoots out from the same spot without moving.
And, the people walking by was also retarded.
I am allowed my own opinion. It was a gimmick, director tried too hard, the scene was too long, and the rapists motives were unbelievable. Of course, chime in with angry homo ganster seeking revenge on the personification of high-class, high caliber woman that embodies the thing that would reject him if he were straight. Blah. Seems too cliche and hetersexually interpreted. You guys liked it because it was shocking and seemed realistic...to you. To me, it got old busted and tired after about 2 minutes.
I might do a re-edit of that scene. Chop it down to 2-3 minutes. Then it will be better.