Originally posted by Darth Jello
Circumcision in Islam is a matter of custom, not faith. Most Muslims just happen to live within traditions and regions that have some sort of practice or tradition. Again, no longer an indication of faith. Hell, we live in a world where it's estimate that as many as 5% of Jews are uncut. You're talking to one of 'em.Basically, this doesn't determine anything other than how good he has it and how good he can give it to Michelle, that's it.
I thought all Jewish men, no exception were circumcised.
Certain Orthodox Rabbi in Israel are going ape shit over people not being circumcised, particularly those immigrated from Russia and such.
I don't think its THAT big of a deal, personally...
Originally posted by Darth Jello
Many reform Jews aren't and when you think about how much errogenous and protective tissue is removed and how much better sex can be for both partners, it is a big deal.
To me, it makes no difference. I wouldn't want my partner to get circumcised and neither will my children. If they decide to do it when they get old - they can.
Who wants to get circumcised should, and the rest should be left to their own.
The point is that there are valid medical arguments on both sides and people who have got their genital mutilation later on in life have reported sagnificant loss of sensation.
If you get it done when you're young - guess you'll never know the difference anyway.
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
The point is that there are valid medical arguments on both sides and people who have got their genital mutilation later on in life have reported sagnificant loss of sensation.
If you get it done when you're young - guess you'll never know the difference anyway.
There is no valid medical argument to circumsize children (certain birth deformities aside), foreskin's there for a reason.
It comes down to visual preference and/or some religious belief that cutting off a piece of your penis brings you closer to God.
There are valid medical arguments in cases of rare congenital defects, infections, and cancers that typically affect a very, very small proportion of men, otherwise, it's just unnecessary surgery. You may as well pull all your teeth and get removable dentures because teeth are difficult to clean (much more than your junk) and are prone to infection.
Originally posted by Robtard
There is no valid medical argument to circumsize children (certain birth deformities aside), foreskin's there for a reason.It comes down to visual preference and/or some religious belief that cutting off a piece of your penis brings you closer to God.
I was TRYING to be diplomatic.
Originally posted by Darth Jello
Actually, quite a bit. At least once Republican congressman is suing Obama over it. Don't know about how accepted the penis none sense will be once that breaks beyond blogs.Oh, and cold, hard truth? don't you mean hot hard truth in this instance?
lol, wow
ya, I find this really hilarious as well then
what is wrong with your country?
Originally posted by Darth Jello
Actually, quite a bit. At least once Republican congressman is suing Obama over it. Don't know about how accepted the penis none sense will be once that breaks beyond blogs.Oh, and cold, hard truth? don't you mean hot hard truth in this instance?
Is Palin the one blogging on this? Wouldn't surprise me, as she's become the Rightwing's facebook heroine.