Originally posted by Creshosk
So her not giving into the blood lust is not evidence she was fighting the bloodlust, despite almost giving into the bloodlust.
What on earth are you talking about
Originally posted by Creshosk
Which is why she nearly gave in?So, those blade blinders. Glad to see they're working for you.
When did she do that? Er I dunno maybe I can read what she said.
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Blade%20fights/BladevsSpitfire.jpg
Ive controlled it for years.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneWhich explains the skrulls and her later sitting on top of him with her fangs at her neck...
What on earth are you talking aboutWhen did she do that? Er I dunno maybe I can read what she said.
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Blade%20fights/BladevsSpitfire.jpg
Ive controlled it for years.
I can see the Blade blinders are up and running at full capacity.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Which explains the skrulls and her later sitting on top of him with her fangs at her neck...I can see the Blade blinders are up and running at full capacity.
You are basically misinterpreting whats going on, just because shes vamped out doesnt mean she can't control it. She even stated in that issue she was only like that when she needed to be and thats another statement indicating self-control. She turns on the vampness when she needs to and switches it off when she needs to. LOL you're arguing just the fact thats shes vamped is an indication of lack of control and thats AFTER she said she can control it. You obvoulsy know Spitefire better than she knows herself.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneThis coming form a proven hypocrite? This should be rich.
You are basically misinterpreting whats going on,
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneGot it, she lost control despite saying that she was in control.
just because shes vamped out doesnt mean she can control it.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneOhh... like where she lost control despite saying she was IN control.
She even stated in that issue she was only like that when she needed to be and thats another statement indicating self-control.[/]
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneUh huh...
She turns on the vampness when she needs to and switches it off when she needs to.[/]b
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneNo. But your lack of reading comprehension makes it understandable why you'd think that was my argument.
[B] LOL you're arguing just the fact thats shes vamped is an indication of lack of control and thats AFTER she said she can control it.
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneHappens alot with comic books. We get an outside perspective of everything that's going on. We get bios and everything. of course that can happen with anybody that has an addiction.
You obvoulsy know Spitefire better than she knows herself.
"I can quit at anytime!"
Yeah... no you can't. If you could we wouldn't be holding an intervention.
So again, the skrulls indicate she lost control as does, like you said, her not being in control.
Blade blinders: Still 100% functional.
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Oh ok got any proof that she can easily kill Blade? When shes vamped out shes out for blood. During the fight they found out they were attracted to each other, that does not apply to the beginning of the fight where she was trying to f*k Blade up.
She WAS vmped out and had her teeth baring at his neck and didn't bite him. She wasn't out for blood. 😐
She was trying to school Blade he was trying to kill her. He got handled.
Originally posted by jinzinblade was bleeding a lot...heck when spitfire was up against dracula she was attacking in the same fashion, the fight ended after he kicked her and pulled her in close, saying blade got handled when he wasn't putting up a defense is like saying Blade handled spitfire in their first fight when he staked her.
She WAS vmped out and had her teeth baring at his neck and didn't bite him. She wasn't out for blood. 😐She was trying to school Blade he was trying to kill her. He got handled.
Originally posted by TrackzGod damm trackz....you 're good.
blade was bleeding a lot...heck when spitfire was up against dracula she was attacking in the same fashion, the fight ended after he kicked her and pulled her in close, saying blade got handled when he wasn't putting up a defense is like saying Blade handled spitfire in their first fight when he staked her.
No need to say anymore.
Originally posted by Trackz
blade was bleeding a lot...heck when spitfire was up against dracula she was attacking in the same fashion, the fight ended after he kicked her and pulled her in close, saying blade got handled when he wasn't putting up a defense is like saying Blade handled spitfire in their first fight when he staked her.
Originally posted by Trackz
blade was bleeding a lot...heck when spitfire was up against dracula she was attacking in the same fashion, the fight ended after he kicked her and pulled her in close, saying blade got handled when he wasn't putting up a defense is like saying Blade handled spitfire in their first fight when he staked her.
Yeah? no it's not.
