A Sword fight is a mismatch, a strictly knife fight may be more even, but I'm thinking on the whole, Blade is going to have a sizable advantage with edged weaponry. Frank needs his normal arsenal to have a shot.
Frank takes more damage than any other street level human before he goes down though for the count though.
Originally posted by srankmissingninyour juvenile attempt at downplaying the feat doesn't change the fact that whenever he gets hit by bullets they cause him little to no problem.
Two bullets in the leg and still able to fight! ZOMG!!! Call the press Trackz, and I'll get Obama on the phone! Do you have snoopdogg's number? See what he can do about a parade!
Originally posted by Trackz
your juvenile attempt at downplaying the feat doesn't change the fact that whenever he gets hit by bullets they cause him little to no problem.
Virtually every street level hero has been shot in the legs/arms/shoulders at one time or another and kept fighting with little draw back, but
Spoiler:. I'm not down playing the feat, I'm just not reading into it waaaaaaaaaaaaay more that how it was presented like you.
the aren't immune to bullets either
Originally posted by srankmissingninDo they have a healing factor, stated on panel? no.
Virtually every street level hero has been shot in the legs/arms/shoulders at one time or another and kept fighting with little draw back, butSpoiler:. I'm not down playing the feat, I'm just not reading into it waaaaaaaaaaaaay more that how it was presented like you.
the aren't immune to bullets either
i also like how despite vampires virtually being shown to be immune to bullets, when blade does it, it's just because the writer didn't address it.
so when wolverine or deadpool takes bullets, am i to assume that the wound just aren't being addressed?
your bias becomes more and more apparent with every post.
Originally posted by Trackz
Do they have a healing factor, stated on panel? no.i also like how despite vampires virtually being shown to be immune to bullets, when blade does it, it's just because the writer didn't address it.
so when wolverine or deadpool takes bullets, am i to assume that the wound just aren't being addressed?
your bias becomes more and more apparent with every post.
Does Blade have a healing factor stated on panel? No.
As much as you would like to believe he does in order to fuel your bias fantasies. Blade doesn't have all the powers of a vampire. He can't hypnotize people. He can't fly. He can't shape shift. He can't turn into mist. He can't heal like one. Vampires having the ability to heal is proof that Blade can, any more than them turning into mist is proof that Blade can turn into mist. Do you think Blade can turn into mist?
Wolverine and Deadpool have actual varied healing factors, not just the insane ramblings of two fanboys.