Originally posted by Darth Martin
Nah. The General takes it. He has every advantage except for healing. He's stronger, smarter, faster, more agile, and has the reach advantage.
He also can't permanently take down Wolverine = huge disadvantage in a fight to the death.
Lightsabres can't cut through a "virtually indestructible" material, sorry SW fanboys, but the nigh-indestructible clause trumps fanboyism.
Originally posted by RobtardSee, this is where the debate becomes pointless. Lightsabers and adamantium are two different things from different galaxies. There is literaly no way to know.
He also can't permanently take down Wolverine = huge disadvantage in a fight to the death.Lightsabres can't cut through a "virtually indestructible" material, sorry SW fanboys, but the nigh-indestructible clause trumps fanboyism.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
See, this is where the debate becomes pointless. Lightsabers and adamantium are two different things from different galaxies. There is literaly no way to know.
Originally posted by snoopdogg
Honest question.Why can't a lightsaber cut adamntium? I have a hard time buying primative Earth can make a metal that trumps the more advanced technology of Star Wars.
Adamantium is "virtually indestructible" as stated by Styker in X2.
So unless there's something in the SW movies that states a lightsabre has no boundaries (which they do have) when cutting through something, it stands to reason they can't.
Originally posted by RobtardDoes Stryker have knowledge of the weapons used in Star Wars?
Adamantium is "virtually indestructible" as stated by Styker in X2.So unless there's something in the SW movies that states a lightsabre has no boundaries (which they do have) when cutting through something, it stands to reason they can't.