General Grievous vs Wolverine.

7 Pages!?

You lazy prick!

Originally posted by KingD19
Well, let me elaborate. Wolverine's skeleton is made of adamantium, one of the 3 indestructible metals in the MU, and it is the only one shown in the movie universe.

There are metals in the Star Wars universe that are resistant, or outright immune to damage from lightsabers (Beskar, Phrik, etc..) Phrik, the pink metal used on the tips of the Magaguards electro staffs was shown blocking saber blades.

So it stands to reason that, if metals like phrik, beskar, durasteel, etc... can stand up to a saber blade, then so can adamantium, which is called indestructible for a good reason, while none of the other metals sans Beskar make the same claim.

No one can know for sure. Point is moot. **** this thread.

The only reason it isn't literally indestructible is because it's vulnerable to molecular manipulation.

You really don't think adamantium can stand up to a saber blade, when metals like cortosis and phrik could stand up against a saber blade, then adamantium can't?

Originally posted by Quincy
No one can know for sure. Point is moot. **** this thread.

Originally posted by KingD19
The only reason it isn't literally indestructible is because it's vulnerable to molecular manipulation.

You really don't think adamantium can stand up to a saber blade, when metals like cortosis and phrik could stand up against a saber blade, then adamantium can't?

Originally posted by Quincy
No one can know for sure. Point is moot. **** this thread.

RJ Knows

I still stand by my theory, though.

Originally posted by KingD19
The only reason it isn't literally indestructible is because it's vulnerable to molecular manipulation.

You really don't think adamantium can stand up to a saber blade, when metals like cortosis and phrik could stand up against a saber blade, then adamantium can't?

Realistically, neither of those things should stand up to a saber blade either. Shitty writing for the win. 😐

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
"Virtually" NOT "literally."

Yes, meaning almost entirely and/or for all practical purposes. Now I know the SW fannies like to think lightsabres have no limits, but they do.

So you have something that is indestructible for all intents and purposes on one side and you have something that has several limitations on the other.

If we're going just by movie feats, then adamantium has the "virtually indestructible" clause as stated by Styker in X2. If someone can point out something greater for the lightsabre from the movies, eg they cut through everything, they have no limits, they could cut God etc., then sure. If not, you SW fanboys just need to STFU.

Lady Deathstrike is hot.

I guess we accept your concession RJ.

And Xanatos, talking about realism in a universe where guys wave glow sticks and use psychokinetic powers because of tiny organisms, or a universe where guys turn into metal and can survive having liquid metal bonded to their skeleton is just ridiculous.

Originally posted by KingD19
I guess we accept your concession RJ.

And Xanatos, talking about realism in a universe where guys wave glow sticks and use psychokinetic powers because of tiny organisms, or a universe where guys turn into metal and can survive having liquid metal bonded to their skeleton is just ridiculous.

There is a way, and I explained it, you just don't want to accept it. The only, nearly indestructible metal in Star Wars is Beskar, it stands up to lightsabers just fine, so does Phrik, Cortosis, etc.... Adamantium, a truly indestructible metal will not be harmed by a lightsaber in any way.

It's a good argument, I give you that, but I see it as two different universes colliding, for all we know Phrik metal is uber compared to adamantium.

So no proof either way yet?

Originally posted by snoopdogg
So no proof either way yet?

Yes, there is logic which can be applied, but [certain]people refuse to listen.

Beskar is virtually indestructible; sabres can't cut it. Sabres also can't cut through over metals/materials that don't have the indestructible label.

Adamantium is virtually indestructible, so it strands to reason sabres can't cut that either. Logic.

From a movie standpoint, there is nothing to suggest that a lightsabre could cut through something that is virtually indestructible.

Yes, this has and will continue to fall on the def ears of the SW fannies.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, there is logic which can be applied, but [certain]people refuse to listen.

Beskar is virtually indestructible; sabres can't cut it. Sabres also can't cut through over metals/materials that don't have the indestructible label.

Adamantium is virtually indestructible, so it strands to reason sabres can't cut that either. Logic.

From a movie standpoint, there is nothing to suggest that a lightsabre could cut through something that is virtually indestructible.

Yes, this has and will continue to fall on the def ears of the SW fannies.

So just because a lightsaber can't cut a metal from the SW universe it can't cut a metal from the Marvel one?

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Are you calling me a SW fanboy with hidden message?

So just because a lightsaber can't cut a metal from the SW universe it can't cut a metal from the Marvel one?

I'm calling anyone who refuses to apply logic a SW fanboy.

We could argue all day which "virtually indestructible" metal is stronger and it would be useless, but at the end of the day, they're both indestructible and we know a lightsabre can't cut through one, because of that indestructible property. So just apply logic.

This whole this-universe/that-universe thing is nothing more than a cop-out.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Are you calling me a SW fanboy with hidden message?

So just because a lightsaber can't cut a metal from the SW universe it can't cut a metal from the Marvel one?