Obi Wan versus Blade....

Originally posted by chilled monkey
It's quite simple. The sword is Blade's. He handles it frequently so he leaves a psychic imprint on it. This imprint is what a Jedi would sense.

Actually he could. The Force would show him the 'correct' way to hold the grip so as not to trigger the trap.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Blade pwning Frost was kinda cool, Blade pwning Drake was LAME.

And Obi wan beating Grievous was....???

A cheap shot...Or as you would put it..."lame"

It's quite simple. The sword is Blade's. He handles it frequently so he leaves a psychic imprint on it. This imprint is what a Jedi would sense.

Where exactly is your evidence for that?

Actually he could. The Force would show him the 'correct' way to hold the grip so as not to trigger the trap.

And where exactly is your evidence for that too?

Talk about clutching at straws to make an argument...

Originally posted by jaden101

Where exactly is your evidence for that?

And where exactly is your evidence for that too?

Ask and ye shall receive:-

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Psychometry

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Aha Good stuff.

Thanks.

thats a non movie force power. N/A.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
thats a non movie force power. N/A.

Star War is more than just the movies. Besides, there's nothing in the movies to contradict it.

Originally posted by Jaden101
Except for the fact that he still won

True, but only due to Abigail's aid.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
thats a non movie force power. N/A.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
It's a SW wiki link, completely valid here.

Nope...Movie feats only.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f102/t478590.html

MVF rules #2.

The link is valid.

YouTube video

So long as it list it under movie powers and abilities it's fine.

You should've used Bruce Hornsby.

Wrong. As long as it's in accordance with MVF rules #2 it's fine.

Bruce Hornsby sucks.

Tupac sucks more...

Matter of opinion.

True...2 infact...The right opinion (mine) and the wrong opinion (anyone who doesn't agree with my opinion).

Sup Rob? Sadako, is that you?

Originally posted by jaden101
So what else could he have done?...He tried using the staff and got beaten...He tried h2h and got beaten...He practically even admits it was a cheap shot by his "So uncivilised" comment about his use of the blaster.

Blade is easily fast enough to get blows on Kenobi...If Grievous was then Blade is by far.

Of course Grievous is going to have the advantage in H2H...,he is made out of steel. However, with that said, Obi Wan was still able to tear his chest apart. Using the fight against Grievous to display Obi Wans H2H skills is not a fair example. Of course Obi-Wan isn't going to be able to beat a steel machine with his bare fists or a crappy staff, it's just physically impossible. Grievous NEVER showed that he was, in ANY way a better fighter or even in the same class as Obi-Wan. He only proved that his body makes bare fists useless. Using a blaster was not a cheap shot, sir. He still had to tear his chest open with his bare hands. If anything, Using four lightsabers was cheap.

Obi-Wans choices and fighting skills were incredibly limited due to Grievous' body.

✅

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Sup Rob? Sadako, is that you?

Now now, Elizabeth.... Your jibe/stab is as hypocritical as it is inaccurate.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Now now, Elizabeth.... Your jibe/stab is as hypocritical as it is inaccurate.

I know it is, Pippi. 😛

Longstocking? haermm