Obi Wan versus Blade....

Started by Rogue Jedi8 pages

Originally posted by jaden101
No. You were insinuating the Obi wan's precog would prevent him from getting hit from Blade...It didn't against another non-force opponent...It won't against Blade.

Blade connects...Obi wan loses.

I am insinuating that precog will go a long way helping Obi Wan avoid getting hit, not avoid altogether.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I am insinuating that precog will go a long way helping Obi Wan avoid getting hit, not avoid altogether.

Didn't really work all that well against Grievous did it?

Originally posted by jaden101
I don't have to. I'm right.

but youre not right.

though if you feel that youre unable to support your stance or at the least dont want to then feel free to stop replying to my posts, as all youre doing is trolling since you dont want to debate. 😄

Originally posted by jaden101
Didn't really work all that well against Grievous did it?
Lets see, who won that battle?

Yeah, we know. Did he win it by avoiding getting hit? No.

Do you really have some bizarre need to bring up pointless information throughout every single one of your "debates".

You're wrong...again....For once, save both of us the bother of having to post anymore and let your pride take a dent. Otherwise it'll end up like another one of your Bob Lee Swagger fellatio threads. (It already has ended up like that...i.e...with you losing...badly)

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
but youre not right.

though if you feel that youre unable to support your stance or at the least dont want to then feel free to stop replying to my posts, as all youre doing is trolling since you dont want to debate. 😄

Might want to read back through the thread and see who's posted the most facts....Here's a clue...It's not you...and it is me.

Originally posted by jaden101
Yeah, we know. Did he win it by avoiding getting hit? No.

Do you really have some bizarre need to bring up pointless information throughout every single one of your "debates".

You're wrong...again....For once, save both of us the bother of having to post anymore and let your pride take a dent. Otherwise it'll end up like another one of your Bob Lee Swagger fellatio threads. (It already has ended up like that...i.e...with you losing...badly)

Tell me, O Kilted one, how did Obi Wan avoid being hit by the four sabers?

Originally posted by jaden101
Might want to read back through the thread and see who's posted the most facts....Here's a clue...It's not you...and it is me.

none of those facts contradict my opinion except for grievous being slower then blade, which is something that you havent proved by any means. so feel free to do so. otherwise i dont see why you keep posting in here. saying im wrong over and over but not providing any support to that statement is trolling.

Well here it is peeps:

YouTube video

From :45 to 1:18, Obi Wan shows his precog by avong Grievous's FOUR blindingly fast blades, lopping two of them off.

From 2:56 to 3:12, he DISARMS Grievous and uses the electrostaff against him.

From 3:29 to 3:40, he wields the electrostaff with the same efficiency as the Magna guards did.

Then at 4:23, five well placed blaster shots, all center mass.

Yeah, Obi Wan is good ONLY with a saber 🙄

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
none of those facts contradict my opinion except for grievous being slower then blade, which is something that you havent proved by any means. so feel free to do so. otherwise i dont see why you keep posting in here. saying im wrong over and over but not providing any support to that statement is trolling.

The fights in the films prove it. I don't see what other evidence you could possible need.

He was fast enough to stop someone hitting with a sword by trapping it between his palms. Strong enough to punch and kick people and vampires across the room. Fast enough to go blade to blade with a suped up Frost and still cut his arm off and then in half (regardless of his ability to regenerate). He is good enough to beat Drake. An version of Dracula...The most powerful Vampire to have existed in any vampire fiction.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Well here it is peeps:

YouTube video

From :45 to 1:18, Obi Wan shows his precog by avong Grievous's FOUR blindingly fast blades, lopping two of them off.

From 2:56 to 3:12, he DISARMS Grievous and uses the electrostaff against him.

From 3:29 to 3:40, he wields the electrostaff with the same efficiency as the Magna guards did.

Then at 4:23, five well placed blaster shots, all center mass.

Yeah, Obi Wan is good ONLY with a saber 🙄

1: We're not talking about him using a sabre though are we? I mean seriously...This is your thread...I shouldn't even have to explain that to you.

2: On the back of a vehicle. Not in the middle of a h2h fight.

3: I think you really need to watch the part with the magnaguards again because if you think his few slow swings of the staff are as efficient as them then you're clearly deluded.

4: From about 10 feet away. Hardly an exceptional feat. Even original trilogy stormtroopers could manage that.

Um....When Drake transformed, Blade didnt have a chance.

Originally posted by jaden101
The fights in the films prove it. I don't see what other evidence you could possible need.

He was fast enough to stop someone hitting with a sword by trapping it between his palms. Strong enough to punch and kick people and vampires across the room. Fast enough to go blade to blade with a suped up Frost and still cut his arm off and then in half (regardless of his ability to regenerate). He is good enough to beat Drake. An version of Dracula...The most powerful Vampire to have existed in any vampire fiction.

i think greivous could do all those things.

when they fought i didnt see either of them moving faster then greivous with their swords.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
i think greivous could do all those things.

when they fought i didnt see either of them moving faster then greivous with their swords.

Didn't see Deacon Frost moving faster than Grievous?

Clearly weren't watching then.

i think youre letting bias warp your sense of reality. 😐

EDIT- hang on. i think im getting the bad guys confused.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Um....When Drake transformed, Blade didnt have a chance.

Except for the fact that he still won. If you're arguing for the way that Obi wan beat Grievous was skilled then the way Blade beat Drake and Frost was more so. And both of them were more powerful than Grievous.

You can't have it both ways.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
i think youre letting bias warp your sense of reality. 😐

Bias in what way? I actually prefer the SW saga over the Blade trilogy. So i'm clearly being objective.

edited.

EDIT-

youre talking about this fight right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhZcPMdVKmc

the only time i see frost moving faster then greivous is that one burst of speed where he becomes invisible for a second.

are you thinking of another time with him?

Originally posted by jaden101
Except for the fact that he still won. If you're arguing for the way that Obi wan beat Grievous was skilled then the way Blade beat Drake and Frost was more so. And both of them were more powerful than Grievous.

You can't have it both ways.

Blade pwning Frost was kinda cool, Blade pwning Drake was LAME.

Originally posted by jaden101
Regardless of whether or not Kenobi could sense the weapon's trap (although quite how you go about "sensing" an inanimate object with the force is beyond me)

It's quite simple. The sword is Blade's. He handles it frequently so he leaves a psychic imprint on it. This imprint is what a Jedi would sense.

Originally posted by jaden101
your point was that he could use the sword against Blade...Fact is he couldn't because he wouldn't be able to pick it up without setting off the trap.

Actually he could. The Force would show him the 'correct' way to hold the grip so as not to trigger the trap.

Originally posted by ShadowFiend
Originally posted by jaden101
I dont remember Kenobi ever going H2H.

He fought H2H against Jango Fett in AotC and did so briefly against Anakin in RotS.