darthgoober
Senior Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
You had your chance but now you have to sit on the sidelines. I am a nice guy and I will give you your battlezone afterwards.
Still not confident in your abilities huh? That's ok just let me know when you're ready.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Oddly enough you wait into hiding the entire month we were supposed to do this and only resurfaced now when the coast was clear. 😂
I wasn't hiding, I was waiting for word from you. Remember...
Originally posted by darthgoober
I understand quan, you think that you're a better judge of Thor than BRB is and that you're opinion trumps what is said in the comic. Believe it if you want, like I said that's on you.And? He was regarded as faster and more dangerous than he was in that amped state. If you can't connect the dots there, that's just another thing that'll have to be on you.
First answer the question. Was Thor's help a massively powerful Elder of the Universe while Surfer's was a bunch of guys like the FF and the Shiar?
Unquantifiable feat. Thor's ability to channel his own divine energy is evidently below his ability to absorb energy from outside sources, which means that we don't know how much energy that was.
Huh?
That Thor's help was powerful enough to give G a fight all by his lonesome, while Surfer's help was guys like the FF and the Shiar. The two encounters aren't comparable.
And my point is that just because Surfer's never put the total sum of his energy into a single blast and unleashed it against G after he'd just finished a battle with Ego doesn't prove that Thor's energy output is superior to Surfers.
Nope. Thor's hammer has absorbed a blast capable of wiping out a fifth of the universe before, so the amount of power it can channel from Thor is evidently different than it's ability to absorb energy from outside sources. Unless of course you think that Thor can channel more energy than is required to destroy a fifth of the universe, in which case I'll just leave you to your opinion and be done with it.
Well just let me know when you're ready...
Originally posted by quanchi112
Again, I am the reader so I have access to more information than a character in the story who just sees what he sees. He couldn't see the valykrie at the time Thor was speaking could he? I could. Do you get it now? I cannot believe I've had to waste this much time explaining something that's fairly obvious.Since when has warrior madness amped your speed?
He was using his hammer which is more dangerous than just punching. If you'd read a lot of Thor you'd realize this and the fact the two fights were completely different based on how Thor actually fought.
Galactus wasn't even injured enough to feel pain by Ego. This is plain for anyone to see reading the comic so once again you;re caught exaggerating a "weakened" state. You just make random claims with no real knowledge of the story and when asked to back it up dodge the question. Just like the Thing example I am noticing a pattern here. You really just don't know.
Enough to chase Galactus off which is more than anything I can say for the Surfer against Galactus when in direct opposition.
You want to ignore the Galactus showing, the Exitar showing, the blood and thunder showing, etc. while you want to exaggerate an inconsistent blackhole blast. That's pretty much all you have done here.
Galactus hadn't even experienced pain in the Thor arc from anything Ego brought to the table while in the Galactus the devourer arc he was described as being extremely weakened.
We agree they aren't anywhere near comparable at all. Thor chased off a much more powerful version of Galactus who was hardly challenged if at all by Ego. I suspect you haven't read it.
Inconsistent writing. In one arc he can barely lift a building while in another he has the strength to shatter mountains. I mean read a couple of comics and you'll see many are inconsistent from one writer to the next.
Oh, I will.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I realize you won an easy battlezone and didn't even have the stones to argue a majority. You still went for crossovers which to me shows a sure lack of confidence on your part.
The crossover was valid evidence for the debate. Using it didn't show a lack of confidence, it was smart debating. Your inability to differentiate between those kinds of things may very be a factor in you being 0-1 against nvr.