Originally posted by -Pr-And I honestly believe he isn't. His other powers are irrelevant to what we are talking about.
it was one example. i honestly believe Superman is stronger than Thor. plus, superman is a lot faster, has heat vision/cold breath/wind breath etc.superman has more than one feat of lifting something said to be infinite.
really. when?
That's nice.
When he took over for Atlas.
Originally posted by Mindset
And I honestly believe he isn't. His other powers are irrelevant to what we are talking about.That's nice.
When he took over for Atlas.
not against hercules they're not.
yes, it is.
i don't agree that the atlas feat could be quantified as being that large. i can see why you would, though.
Originally posted by -Pr-Yes, when we are only talking about strength they are irrelevant.
not against hercules they're not.yes, it is.
i don't agree that the atlas feat could be quantified as being that large. i can see why you would, though.
I don't see how you wouldn't. It makes about as much sense as Supes lifting a magic book that has an infinite number of pages, thus has infinite weight, or Supes and WW lifting Spectre who weighs an infinite amount of time, thus an infinite amount of weight, which makes absolutely no sense.
Originally posted by Mindset
Yes, when we are only talking about strength they are irrelevant.I don't see how you wouldn't. It makes about as much sense as Supes lifting a magic book that has an infinite number of pages, thus has infinite weight, or Supes and WW lifting Spectre who weighs an infinite amount of time, thus an infinite amount of weight, which makes absolutely no sense.
but i wasn't just talking about strength, though.
its comics. how often does it make sense? lifting "infinity" shouldnt be possible, and yet superman did it. i just don't think what hercules did was the same thing, that's all.
Originally posted by -Pr-But I was only talking about strength, in fact, we were both only talking about strength, that is why we both started replying to each other...
but i wasn't just talking about strength, though.its comics. how often does it make sense? lifting "infinity" shouldnt be possible, and yet superman did it. i just don't think what hercules did was the same thing, that's all.
OK.
Originally posted by Mindset
But I was only talking about strength, in fact, we were both only talking about strength, that is why we both started replying to each other...OK.
yes, originally we were only talking strength. i only added them in because even if we both agreed on herc being as strong as superman, superman has those extra powers to help him out.
The Hercules feat is blown out of proportion, for one. Hercules is absolutley destroyed by Superman feat, position and relative performance-wise. Even if we do not take JLA/Avengers as admissable forum evidence (for whatever reason that may be), it still gives us a bigger picture on how Superman compares, where not only was Hercules physically handled by somebody Superman vastly overpowers in physical combat (Wonder Woman) but Superman was also portrayed as Thor's physicall superior by quite a bit.
Originally posted by Philosophía
The Hercules feat is blown out of proportion, for one. Hercules is absolutley destroyed by Superman feat-wise, position and relative performance-wise. Even if we do not take JLA/Avengers as admissable forum evidence (for whatever reason that may be), it still gives us a bigger picture on how Superman compares, when not only was Hercules physically handled by somebody Superman vastly overpowers in physicall combat (Wonder Woman) but Superman was also portrayed as Thor's physicall superior by quite a bit.
Originally posted by Philosophía
Eat penis.
Originally posted by Mindset
Challenge your usage of crossover evidence that we don't use?I'll pass.
The JLA/Avengers part of my post isn't debatable, as that is exactly what the comic portrayed.
I was talking more about the feat, position and relative performance part or the Hercules' feat is blown out of proportion one.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaThe fact that we don't use crossovers isn't debatable.
The JLA/Avengers part of my post isn't debatable, as that is exactly what the comic portrayed.I was talking more about the feat, position and relative performance part or the Hercules' feat is blown out of proportion one.
The Herc feat is as blown out of proportion as any of Supes 'infinite' lifting feats.