Originally posted by Mindset
The fact that we don't use crossovers isn't debatable.The Herc feat is as blown out of proportion as any of Supes 'infinite' lifting feats.
Yes, which I acknowledged in my post.
Not really, no. I'd also like to point out that it was you who first brought up the 'holding the sky' feat as evidence before any of us mentioned the infinite weight lifting. 🙂
Originally posted by PhilosophíaI'm not attempting humor, you haven't brought up anything to debate besides what happened in the crossover and a 'NUH UH!' to Herc's feat of lifting up the sky being comparable to Supes lifting the book or Spectre.
Hiding behind incoherence and attempts at humor instead of proving your points ? Tsk.At least Bran is capable of both humor and debates. You still have much to learn.
Right, Phil.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaNo, the basis of my argument was that Herc has shown himself to have comparable strength compared to Thor, thus, comparable strength compared to Supes.
As oppossed to "Hercules lifted the sky" basis of your stance, only so that later you would go on about how 'stupid' this arguments are ?As always.
Him lifting the sky was obviously just part of my post.
Originally posted by Mindset
No, the basis of my argument was that Herc has shown himself to have comparable strength compared to Thor, thus, comparable strength compared to Supes.Him lifting the sky was obviously just part of my post.
You first brought up the 'lifting the sky' as evidence for Hercules not being physically inferior to Superman, before anybody else brought 'Superman lifted infinite weight', only to later point out how nonsensical these arguments are, did you not ?
Originally posted by PhilosophíaYes, I did.
You first brought up the 'lifting the sky' as evidence for Hercules not being physically inferior to Superman, before anybody else brought 'Superman lifted infinite weight', only to later point out how nonsensical these arguments are, did you not ?
I also brought up Herc not being weaker than Supes as proof as him not being weaker than Supes, I was obviously not completely serious in the post. But once Pr brought up that Supes infinite feat was better, I showed how they were both the same in the breadth of their showings, and the ridiculousness of them.
However, the main point was that Supes is not stronger than Herc based on both their relation to Thor in strength.
Did you actually have anything you wanted to debate about, or do you want to just keep talking about this?
Originally posted by Mindset
Yes, I did.I also brought up Herc not being weaker than Supes as proof as him not being weaker than Supes, I was obviously not completely serious in the post. But once Pr rbought up that Supes infinite feat was better, I showed how they were both the same in the breadth of their showings, and the ridiculousness of them.
However, the main point was that Supes is not stronger than Herc based on both their relation to Thor in strength.
Did you actually have anything you wanted to debate about, or do you want to just keep talking about this?
Good.
You brought "he lifted the sky" just for the lulz and to bait/get a rise out of Raoul ? Maybe there's still hope for you.
Deflecting the discussion from a Hercules/Superman debate to a Thor/Superman one is a good tactic, but if you're just gonna go into a "I'll let Thor fanboys handle it" instead of following through I'll be dissapointed.
I like talking about this.