Actually I don't agree with any of Thor vs. Silver Surfer fights.
Theoretically Surfer should demolish Thor everytime. I mean SS has light speed reflexes, able to move very fast, can amp strength far beyond Thor's, can phase through Thor's attacks, can create shields, can absorb energy, can create black holes, etc. Thor beating Surfer is not only ridiculous but contradictory to comics.
So I say that since SS>Thor and Superman>Hal then each team gets 5/10.
Originally posted by h1a8We don't ignore the comics over here. Thor has stomped the Surfer and you acted like it's contradictory is further proof you are clueless about what happens inside the books themselves.
Actually I don't agree with any of Thor vs. Silver Surfer fights.
Theoretically Surfer should demolish Thor everytime. I mean SS has light speed reflexes, able to move very fast, can amp strength far beyond Thor's, can phase through Thor's attacks, can create shields, can absorb energy, can create black holes, etc. Thor beating Surfer is not only ridiculous but contradictory to comics.So I say that since SS>Thor and Superman>Hal then each team gets 5/10.
Originally posted by quanchi112
We don't ignore the comics over here. Thor has stomped the Surfer and you acted like it's contradictory is further proof you are clueless about what happens inside the books themselves.
So what if Spider-man stomps Firelord everytime they meet and what if Firelord stomps or stalemates Silver Surfer every time they meet? . What would you say?
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ 😑 Based on correlating facts, Thor would fair, at the very least, equally, if not better. I happen to think he'd fair better.
It was never stated that the attack Thor did on Loki (if this is the "soul suck" attack that we're talking about) was actually a soul-attack. Seems more like a lifeforce attack to me. Especially since Loki's soul later escaped into Odin's body. Plus Loki was extremely weakened when Thor performed this move. The Surfer has been able to resist matter manipulation, soul drains and life drains in the past. I don't see why he would be able to resist the "soul suck" and I don't even see how the attack can even land on him (as the one time it was shown, it was done at close range).
Originally posted by -Pr-
Question. Mjolnir is a weapon created to recognise nobility in others, right? So it can be lifted or not depending on the person trying to lift it.Why would it then willingly try to suck the soul from a noble being?
Again, there really was NO indication that the attack Thor used on Loki was actually soul-based. It seemed like it was more lifeforce based to me.
The nobility part is a good point, too. It HAS to be mentioned that when Thor used it on Loki (if this is that attack in question), he was EXTREMELY hesitant to use it even on Loki. CIS rules apply in the forum and so I highly doubt that Thor would use this attack on the Surfer (kinda like how the Surfer wouldn't do the "shard board" attack on his opponents).
Originally posted by -Pr-I don't recall an instance where Mjolnir refused to unleash its power where a noble person was involved.
Question. Mjolnir is a weapon created to recognise nobility in others, right? So it can be lifted or not depending on the person trying to lift it.Why would it then willingly try to suck the soul from a noble being?
While Mjolnir does indeed have a certain amount of self-guidance, it's more a function of magical enchantment rather than a personified awareness separate from Thor.
Originally posted by Naija boyNo matter who the user or the circumstances? That's your prerogative.
It was Reed richards using it and regardless of user id think the soul gem>>> than thors soul suck any day.