Al versus Murtaugh..

What matters is the end result, dude was sliced in half like hot butter. Lets say SS hits BB in the midsection with his blades, you think they will do nothing to B?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
What matters is the end result, dude was sliced in half like hot butter. Lets say SS hits BB in the midsection with his blades, you think they will do nothing to B?

Going by screen feats, the end result would be BB winning due to far superior (and shown) fighting skills.

I think it would damage him.

Be a man.

It would damage him, thank you.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
It would damage him, thank you.

You're welcome. What's your point though? BB's been hit/damaged before, when he took on the bulldozer and cat, he got ripped up, yet his fighting prowess pulled him a win, despite being smaller and outnumbered. This would be no different, going by onscreen feats of both opponents.

Be a man.

haermm Take it to the BB SS thread, YOU be a man.

Your man-being powers are definitely in question here RJ, youve refused to admit that as Robtard quite rightly pointed out, you are being very uber hypocritical and double standardy when it suits your desire to be opposite, debating positions wise.

Always mass debating while ignoring the basics.

Since you are refusing yo be a man, admitting your wrongness, you drag this out til all and sundry are forced to accpet that rather than be a man, you'd prefer to be the debate equivalent of some ladyboy.. 😛

Here's the score...

SS has a screen feat, Al does not. I think SS's one screen feat trumps BB's screen feats.

Now.....I know where you guys are coming from. "He sliced sideways in half while he was running away!!!!"

I got that. I understand that. All I am saying is this: SS is too fast for BB. BB will not hit him with his cannons. It will go CQC, and when it does, SS's blades will make short work of BB.

Is that so hard to understand? I'm not saying I'm right or wrong here, I am just saying it is my OPINION.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Here's the score...

SS has a screen feat, Al does not. I think SS's one screen feat trumps BB's screen feats.

Now.....I know where you guys are coming from. "He sliced sideways in half while he was running away!!!!"

I got that. I understand that. All I am saying is this: SS is too fast for BB. BB will not hit him with his cannons. It will go CQC, and when it does, SS's blades will make short work of BB.

No onscreen feats to prove any of that.

Is that so hard to understand? I'm not saying I'm right or wrong here, I am just saying it is my OPINION.

And can you not just change it then, when provided with contrary proof/and or good countering theories...?

Hey, it's my opinion, man, that's all I can say.

Which is fair enough, if its not not expected to take precidence over ones based on facts, logic and reason.

Stupid

Que...?

Donde Esta la biblioteca Sadako?

Enchiladas.

RJ,

Sea un hombre.

Originally posted by Quincy
Donde Esta la biblioteca Sadako?

Si. Izquierda, derecha, sigue derecho...busque el gordo cerdo loco Harry Potter pervertir (al albergue juvenil), Izquierda, fumar la marihuana, y hacia el sol.

Double postage edit!

Woohoooooo!

Hot tamale chili pepper.

Por que estamos hablando en espanol? No mas hablar en espanol, por favor. Ademas, mis huevos son gigantescos. Quieres un gusto?

Oh, and...

Que arriba.

and...

A la luna, bebe.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
SS is too fast for BB. BB will not hit him with his cannons. It will go CQC, and when it does, SS's blades will make short work of BB.

Is that so hard to understand?

Not at all.

You're scripting a fight the way you want it to go despite evidence to the contrary. It's utterly foolish to such such a contentious screen feat trumps Bumblebee fighting and defeating multiple Decepticons, two at once even.

You're wrong to suggest so.

Is THAT so hard to understand?

-AC