Hercules+Thor Vs Wonder woman

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Depends what the feat is.

If I see an ordinary no name Kryptonian tanking something, then you better believe I'm using it as a basis that Superman can do the exact same at least especially if when the feat happens the writer make sure to highlight that the said Kryptonian is not as powerful as Superman. You wouldn't do the same?

And the difference between Thor and Asgardians is a lot bigger than Superman and Kryptonians. The average Asgardian is like a Class 35. It's been made pretty clear that whatever an average Asgardian can do, Thor can do a lot better.

But if you don't want me to, I won't. I really don't care. I just wanted to highlight how due to his Asgardian heritage Thor would have an incredible resistance to pain etc. I have other feats. That's the most recent one that came to my mind, and I know how much some people love highlighting whether feats are current or not.

even if you wanted to use that for thor, i'd still give superman the edge in durability and damage soak, personally.

Originally posted by -Pr-
even if you wanted to use that for thor, i'd still give superman the edge in durability and damage soak, personally.

[QUOTE=]Originally posted by Badabing
Don't make spite threads.[/QUOTE]so yeah why aint this one closed yet? 😇

wow. 9 pages. wow. (and i just added to it again).

i find it funny how people immediately concur that WW is a better h2h fighter than thor or hercules just coz she does fancier kicks and flips.

thor and herc wrestle and box, 2 of the oldest and most effective MA (and i think thor sometimes kick knee caps too). point is, they are no less effective in h2h.

take captain america vs. daredevil for example. DD goes at cap with flying kicks, sommeraults and all his sweet ninjutsu moves; and all cap does is dodge, punch, dodge, punch. Capt. A then walks away with DD bloody and beaten and almost unconscious.

there's no way WW can win even a single match with both thor and herc.

Originally posted by FrothByte
wow. 9 pages. wow. (and i just added to it again).

i find it funny how people immediately concur that WW is a better h2h fighter than thor or hercules just coz she does fancier kicks and flips.

thor and herc wrestle and box, 2 of the oldest and most effective MA (and i think thor sometimes kick knee caps too). point is, they are no less effective in h2h.

take captain america vs. daredevil for example. DD goes at cap with flying kicks, sommeraults and all his sweet ninjutsu moves; and all cap does is dodge, punch, dodge, punch. Capt. A then walks away with DD bloody and beaten and almost unconscious.

there's no way WW can win even a single match with both thor and herc.

Originally posted by Zeuodin

but in hand to hand, she beats either one soundly.

Originally posted by SoulDevourer
lol
only if she flash her boobs to distract em , then maybe she got a chance ^^ else WW FTL 💃

Do you not get that Hercules, alone, is no match for Diana, in hand to hand combat? It is *classic* to her descriptor: she has defeated Hercules on countless occasions, matching his physical power and always being portrayed as the more skilled fighter; the only times she has lost to him were when he was aided by other gods (as in this scenario), or by guile (not guile in combat, but circumstantial deception of the story). Against Thor, the bias of fanbois is quite clear...

And, of course, against both she should lose most battles.

But saying she would FTL against either of them, individually, just shows how not up on your comics you are (and by "up", I mean have not read an issue of Wonder Woman over the past 7 decades).

Originally posted by tideoftime
Do you not get that Hercules, alone, is no match for Diana, in hand to hand combat? It is *classic* to her descriptor: she has defeated Hercules on countless occasions, matching his physical power and always being portrayed as the more skilled fighter; the only times she has lost to him were when he was aided by other gods (as in this scenario), or by guile (not guile in combat, but circumstantial deception of the story). Against Thor, the bias of fanbois is quite clear...

And, of course, against both she should lose most battles.

But saying she would FTL against either of them, individually, just shows how not up on your comics you are (and by "up", I mean have not read an issue of Wonder Woman over the past 7 decades).

"fanbois"? comin from a guy who register here jus to defend WW 😂

Originally posted by SoulDevourer
lol at the bs...your refering to dc Herc right? 🙄 try read the title this is about mu Herc, da real one 😮‍💨

"fanbois"? comin from a guy who register here jus to defend WW 😂

??? 😕

Uh, okay... I haven't started any WW threads here -- there seems to be a number of threads with WW in their topic (more than I think makes sense, but I don't judge what other people choose for topics), and I am just responding to what I perceive as a *definite* fanboi bias against her (which I don't fully understand, because most of the presented evidence -- by other people, mind you -- seems to at least make her a significant player amongst the "big boys"😉.

And whether it's Marvel or DC (and, btw, Hercules in comics existed in DC long before he did in Marvel, and is usually portrayed as being stronger than his Marvel counterpart, especially in his "deified" form), is irrelevant to this -- Diana has defeated him in crossovers as well.

And BTW: I really wish these WW threads would just go away, and this is the only one I am still keeping up on, really, as it's spite/bias is so obvious that it requires a splash of common sense to be thrown on it.