Thor's Godblast vs Superman's most powerfull HV shot

HV is versatile indeed but I still think godblast is more impressive and overall powerful.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Didn't get defensive (I mean, seriously, where are you getting this from?). Pls point out where that was.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
You didn't give a clear answer at all. Simply stated a universal reply passive aggressively aimed at whoever might disagree with you w/c some could construe as you having a misunderstanding of position. If anything, you should have just said "not you" and that would have been the end of it.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Of course we agree about how he interpreted what he said. Let me clarify, at that moment we were not interpreting any scans or taking positions on who has better "feats" or whatever.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I did note it. And that's why I addressed you, because it's not coming out like that. His position that one shared feat(Thor's) is more impressive than the other(Superman's) is pretty clear.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
This is also how I interpreted ODG's argument. I dunno where Delta got his....
Man, this thread has degenerated badly....

Originally posted by Nibedicus
What's lame about not wanting to post an opinion on something that I'm not interested to post an opinion about? I'm neutral, what's wrong with that?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Why are you asking me a question I've already stated multiple times I that I have not taken a position in?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
See? This is why I asked if you meant me, you might have interpreted what I said as a form of agreement. Me asking if you were meaning me was to make sure we don't get a misunderstanding on positions here.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Make up your mind, either you believed my post was "agreeing that Thor's feat was greater than Superman's" (wherein it WOULD fit into your reply) or it "crystal clear"-ly wasn't.
If anyone was being defensive here (and needs to think for a second), it's you.
Neutrality is not trolling. I'm not sure where you're getting this whole "worked up" schtick. I'm merely calmly stating some things to you. Please point out where in my replies I was even implying I got worked up?
No offense, but this feels a lot like projection to me....
If you wanted this to end, you could have simply posted "you know what, this has nothing to do with the debate and that's all I got to say about that".
Or you could just concede that this was a misunderstanding.
But as long as you throw incorrect accusations, I'm gonna reply to correct you. Sorry if you don't like it.

Originally posted by Diesldude
I told you, who it was addressed to, it didn’t concern your position, what the hell? Do you need me to spell out ABC’s to you as well? This is a message board, if you need people to spoon feed you simple straight answers which you yourself fail to do, then you should look into doing something else with your free time.

Originally posted by Diesldude
I feel like a broken record

Originally posted by ODG
I haven't made a flippantly ignorant strongly stated comment. So what proposition am I supposed to be supporting with evidence? I asked you a question. That was it. Trying to inject anything more than that was just your way of avoiding giving me an answer. So be it.

You don't want to talk about it. I get it. Then just say that upfront. If you flatly state it, I won't press the issue. Stop pretending that this is anything other than that. You wouldn't be insulting anybody else's intelligence, other than your own. No, it wasn't. This may surprise you, but I don't really care for long-winded circumlocutory ranting walls o' text. And, this may be an earth-shattering revelation for you, but I probably don't really care for those especially when it comes to you. *insert obnoxious Inception BRRAWWRWRRRMRMMM for revelatory sound effect* I didn't ask you to address every single godblast, wtf. You make it sound like I came into this thread with some devious agenda to transform this thread into my own speaking pulpit and brag about my extensive Thor knowledge (over a few feats that you can count on one hand????) Christ.

Christ-mas.

I haven’t seen the scan of Thor supporting ¼ of of the sagging multiverse structure. I’ve checked out your respect thread and I didn’t see it in there, care to link it? I also briefly scanned this thread and most of, if not all the scans were uploaded/linked by people supporting HV. All I seen form you were words like “hypocrite” “necrobump” “half wit”. Then again, your another guy who has nothing better to do than look for fights on the internet. Seriously how old are you? I’ve never seen you civil in any of your posts? You still getting picked on even after highschool?

Your petty insults caused by your surly attitude betrays your inability to make real friends. You are calling me a hypocrite, no not just a hypocrite, but a spectacular hypocrite because you fail to realize that I might actually believe that thor's feat may be better than Superman's. I blame that on lack of YOUR people skills. So please don’t call me a hypocrite you reclusive basement dweller.

Originally posted by Diesldude
I haven’t seen the scan of Thor supporting ¼ of of the sagging multiverse structure. I’ve checked out your respect thread and I didn’t see it in there, care to link it? I also briefly scanned this thread most of the scans were uploaded/linked by people supporting HV. All I seen form your were words like “hypocrite” “necrobump” “half wit”. Then again, your another guy who has nothing better to do than look for fights on the internet. Seriously how old are you? I’ve never seen you civil in any of your posts? You still getting picked on even after highschool?

Your petty insults caused by your surly attitude betrays your inability to make real friends. You are calling me a hypocrite, no not just a hypocrite, but a spectacular hypocrite because you fail to realize that I might actually believe that thor's feat may be better than Superman's. I blame that on lack of YOUR people skills. So please don’t call me a hypocrite you reclusive basement dweller.

You're the one who addressed me first with veiled insults and hypocritical accusations first, sir. I certainly can "rise above it," but I don't have to. And my "people skills" have squat to do with your stupid arguments being torn down. And while your resentment over being called out so clearly on it (and not just by me) is amusing, it still doesn't salvage any of your baseless accusations.

You projected your own hypocrisy onto me. Completely exposed by your blatant double standards. That's all that matters. That's all that's on-topic. And your attempts to bait me are noted and dismissed. Cry more about it.

EDIT: Also feel free to let me know when you want to discuss 1/4th big bang heat vision. LOL

Originally posted by ODG
Oh, hey look. Someone else who's gone off-topic and is trying to get personal because they don't like how their arguments are going. Totally didn't see that coming. I'm not even going to bother dignifying your wretched flaming with a similar response.

You're the one who addressed me first with veiled insults and hypocritical accusations first, sir. I certainly can "rise above it," but I don't have to. And my "people skills" have squat to do with your stupid arguments being torn down. And while your resentment over being called out so clearly on it (and not just by me) is amusing, it still doesn't salvage any of your baseless accusations.

You projected your own hypocrisy onto me. Completely exposed by your blatant double standards. That's all that matters. That's all that's on-topic. And your attempts to bait me are noted and dismissed. Cry more about it.

EDIT: Also feel free to let me know when you want to discuss 1/4th big bang heat vision. LOL

And to think Nabisco almost had me convinced that my veiled insults and hypocritical accusations were directed at him. Ha, thanks for clearing that up for me. Who has torn down my arguments? You refused to even answer a simple yes or no question. No one is projecting hypocrisy and what double standards have I set? Is this more of that repetitive verbiage you are known to use in every other post of yours to meet some sort of an insult quota? It’s not amusing, frankly it’s borderline boring.
Instead of discussing the ¼ big bang HV feat, why don’t you re-read my statement on it and try to understand the context behind it.

Originally posted by Diesldude
And to think Nabisco almost had me convinced that my veiled insults and hypocritical accusations were directed at him. Ha, thanks for clearing that up for me. Who has torn down my arguments? You refused to even answer a simple yes or no question. No one is projecting hypocrisy and what double standards have I set? Is this more of that repetitive verbiage you are known to use in every other post of yours to meet some sort of an insult quota? It’s not amusing, frankly it’s borderline boring.
Instead of discussing the ¼ big bang HV feat, why don’t you re-read my statement on it and try to understand the context behind it. But before that, why not visit this page https://www.facebook.com/Aloneneed first?

It's plainly obvious that you're projecting every single crappy aspect of your own attitude and own life onto others. And while it is sad based on all the insults you've laid so far, it's not on-topic and it's not even close to being cogent argumentation.

But I get that refusing to discuss 1/4th big bang heat vision and posting a link to Facebook somehow wins you this argument. If you've got nothing but insults and trolling left to justify your blatant hypocrisy and misplaced resentment, nobody cares.

Oh and btw:

Originally posted by Diesldude
This is why I never get worked up about dull insults and I definitely don't go trolling people with a position that doesn't CONCERN me.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Your’re losing it, your reply to my first post was asking who I was referring to.

Let me get this straight, so what you're saying is that since I asked who you were talking to, I was being defensive and me asking you where exactly you got this idea from is me losing it?

Fascinating how some human minds work....

Originally posted by Diesldude
I feel like a broken record, I said that my post was directed at those who feel superman could not have performed his feat alone. What is so complex about this statement?

What a weird answer. This has nothing to do with our previous exchanges at all....

Let me break down what was said:

You said that you "gave me an opportunity" to stay our of the argument via your "clearly stated post". I replied that your initial post was not clear at all, thus I asked the question. And that if you replied to it with a "not you" (instead of a long winded rant), then it would have been the end of it.

You also said that "all you 2 (me and GK) stated was that we agreed with ODG's interpretation". In w/c I replied: "Of course we agree about how he interpreted what he said." Key word: What he said. He said it, thus his interpretation of what he MEANT by what he said is automatically the right one. Me and GK disagreed with Delta's interpretation of what ODG said based on how we understood it.

With all that said, how does the act of you re-explaining who the vague target of your thinly veiled insult was have anything to do with replying to what was said????

I feel like there's a breakdown in communication here.

Originally posted by Diesldude
If you can’t understand this, then maybe I gave you too much credit and maybe you really weren’t protecting someone who fell within this scope. Your failure to understand a simple statement is why you thought I was speaking about you and why you got defensive from the get go.

Oh irony....

Originally posted by Diesldude
Check out GK’s post.

Ok, LET'S check GK's post shall we?

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
His position that one shared feat(Thor's) is more impressive than the other(Superman's) is pretty clear.

Let's break it down:

[His position] that one shared feat (Thor's) is more impressive than the other [is pretty clear].

The basic sentence structure literally means that: His position (being that one shared feat (Thor's) is more impressive thatn the other(Superman's)) is clear (easily understandable).

And I could be wrong here. The only person that could really confirm/deny this is GK himself. However, bear in mind that this followed an exchange where he was responding to Delta's interpretation of ODG statements (w/c ODG himself clarified). Thus, it stands to reason that my interpretation of what GK said follows the flow of the debate a bit more logically.

Somewhere along the line you came to the conclusion that we were agreeing with ODG's position where clearly that's not what we said.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Dude you really are losing it, not just the argument but also the reason for the argument. You don’t even know what you are posting from one minute to the next. You just stated that you aren’t taking a position on who has the better feat but GK stated that Thor’s feat is more impressive than Superman’s feat. Your agreement to his post is contradictory to what you just said.

You assume much by thinking I've lost sight of my reason for the argument. At first it was simply for clarification, but as you're continuously baiting me with all your false, off-the-wall accusations (and weird interpretations), and as I'm quite bored tonite and a bit of an insomniac, I've felt compelled to reply.

And what are YOUR reasons?

And no, I believe that GK was not stating Thor's feat is more impressive (at least not with that one post of his).

You went from a U MAD? to a U CRAZEE? reply and you accuse ppl of thuggery...

Smh.

Originally posted by Diesldude
So my man, what is it? What do you really want to argue about for the sake of just arguing?

I already stated it. You keep throwing false accusations, I'll have to step in to correct you.

Originally posted by Diesldude
It’s lame because you aren’t going against my point ..

Why should I go against your "point" (w/ regards to Superman's/Thor's "feat", that is) when I've already stated that I'm undecided on the matter? I come to the forum to read ppl's comments/arguments (many of w/c are very good).

Your definition of "lame"/"ghey"/etc seems to be anything that doesn't fit within the very limited scope of what/how you want things to be.

Originally posted by Diesldude
.. yet you continue to beech and moan like we have an argument here.

Irony. Smh.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Again with this BS? I told you, who it was addressed to, it didn’t concern your position, what the hell? Do you need me to spell out ABC’s to you as well? This is a message board, if you need people to spoon feed you simple straight answers which you yourself fail to do, then you should look into doing something else with your free time.
 

You have some weird methods of replying to people. Nothing you said above addressed anything I said at all.

Let's break down what happened:

You said that your post (w/c was addressed to people who were participating in the Thor GB vs Superman HV feat debate) did not address me (as I've stated that I was NOT participating in that said debate).

Then you said that I WAS participating in the Thor GB vs Superman HV feat debate ("agreeing that Thor's feat was greater than Superman's feat"😉.

I then state that instances (of misinterpretation of position) like this are WHY I ask for clarification (on who is being addressed by a comment) in the first place. It happens in the interwebs way too much. I explained this as my reason for seeking clarification the first time. NOT some extreme form of defensiveness over nothing.

You then reply with the above. Fascinating.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Dude you ask me to make up my mind when you are unaware that you contradicted your earlier posts? You never had an argument with what I said about the scan, rather who it was directed to and continued to troll even though my post didn’t concern your position. My original post was to show that superman could have performed the feat alone and on this you aren’t even revealing your position so why the argument? Until you do so, I’m just going to copy and paste a part of this reply because it is fitting to most of your posts on this argument.

You throw around words like "contradicting my earlier posts" when you don't even point out where this so-called contraction is. Then you accuse me of trolling when I've not used a single inflammatory word/statement beyond "talking to the wind". Yet on your end, you flame, toss unfounded accusations, baseless claims, veiled insults and present yourself in a very hostile and abrasive fashion.

Maybe you should read your own posts and my posts and compare the demeanor of how we communicate with each other before you start accusing people of trolling?

Originally posted by ODG
Oh, hey look. Someone else who's gone off-topic and is trying to get personal because they don't like how their arguments are going. Totally didn't see that coming. I'm not even going to bother dignifying your wretched flaming with a similar response.

You're the one who addressed me first with veiled insults and hypocritical accusations first, sir. I certainly can "rise above it," but I don't have to. And my "people skills" have squat to do with your stupid arguments being torn down. And while your resentment over being called out so clearly on it (and not just by me) is amusing, it still doesn't salvage any of your baseless accusations.

You projected your own hypocrisy onto me. Completely exposed by your blatant double standards. That's all that matters. That's all that's on-topic. And your attempts to bait me are noted and dismissed. Cry more about it.

EDIT: Also feel free to let me know when you want to discuss 1/4th big bang heat vision. LOL

What was that phrase you used? Oh yeah Spectacular hypocrite, well you are a Spectacular Liar. For a man who lives in the basement of a glass house shouldn't be throwing stones. Kindly post the scan that shows the 4 Thors supporting the Multiverse with their God Blast. Holding/supporting the entire house is much greater than fixing a crack on a wall of the sagging house. Only a half wit buffoon will have difficulties correlating this with Thor’s feat, but I MIGHT be giving You way too much credit here.
It’s clearly obvious you had to intentions of countering my point because your premise of Thor supporting ¼ of the Multiverse is a big giant lie. Knowing this little tidbit, you decided to project YOUR hypocrisy onto me and further send this thread into the toilet.
Nice Job Dummy! I applaud you for keeping this thread open, fighting the good fight all based on a false feat from Thor. I wonder how long you can keep up with this façade while assailing unfunny insults from the safe confines of your parent’s basement.

Edit, oh before you think im worked up, I’m not. Freaking storm outside, I though working from home would be a piece of cake but our sql databases are feeling the cold and Im here trying to bring them online. I don’t mind your insults, I hope I am not getting to you. Just post the scan of thor supporting ¼ of the MULTIVERSE and I will concede. How’s that?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Let me get this straight, so what you're saying is that since I asked who you were talking to, I was being defensive and me asking you where exactly you got this idea from is me losing it?

Fascinating how some human minds work....

What a weird answer. This has nothing to do with our previous exchanges at all....

Let me break down what was said:

You said that you "gave me an opportunity" to stay our of the argument via your "clearly stated post". I replied that your initial post was not clear at all, thus I asked the question. And that if you replied to it with a "not you" (instead of a long winded rant), then it would have been the end of it.

You also said that "all you 2 (me and GK) stated was that we agreed with ODG's interpretation". In w/c I replied: "Of course we agree about how he interpreted what he said." Key word: What he said. He said it, thus his interpretation of what he MEANT by what he said is automatically the right one. Me and GK disagreed with Delta's interpretation of what ODG said based on how we understood it.

With all that said, how does the act of you re-explaining who the vague target of your thinly veiled insult was have anything to do with replying to what was said????

I feel like there's a breakdown in communication here.

Oh irony....

Ok, LET'S check GK's post shall we?

Let's break it down:

[His position] that one shared feat (Thor's) is more impressive than the other [is pretty clear].

The basic sentence structure literally means that: His position (being that one shared feat (Thor's) is more impressive thatn the other(Superman's)) is clear (easily understandable).

And I could be wrong here. The only person that could really confirm/deny this is GK himself. However, bear in mind that this followed an exchange where he was responding to Delta's interpretation of ODG statements (w/c ODG himself clarified). Thus, it stands to reason that my interpretation of what GK said follows the flow of the debate a bit more logically.

Somewhere along the line you came to the conclusion that we were agreeing with ODG's position where clearly that's not what we said.

You assume much by thinking I've lost sight of my reason for the argument. At first it was simply for clarification, but as you're continuously baiting me with all your false, off-the-wall accusations (and weird interpretations), and as I'm quite bored tonite and a bit of an insomniac, I've felt compelled to reply.

And what are YOUR reasons?

And no, I believe that GK was not stating Thor's feat is more impressive (at least not with that one post of his).

You went from a U MAD? to a U CRAZEE? reply and you accuse ppl of thuggery...

Smh.

I already stated it. You keep throwing false accusations, I'll have to step in to correct you.

Why should I go against your "point" (w/ regards to Superman's/Thor's "feat", that is) when I've already stated that I'm undecided on the matter? I come to the forum to read ppl's comments/arguments (many of w/c are very good).

Your definition of "lame"/"ghey"/etc seems to be anything that doesn't fit within the very limited scope of what/how you want things to be.

Irony. Smh.

You have some weird methods of replying to people. Nothing you said above addressed anything I said at all.

Let's break down what happened:

You said that your post (w/c was addressed to people who were participating in the Thor GB vs Superman HV feat debate) did not address me (as I've stated that I was NOT participating in that said debate).

Then you said that I WAS participating in the Thor GB vs Superman HV feat debate ("agreeing that Thor's feat was greater than Superman's feat"😉.

I then state that instances (of misinterpretation of position) like this are WHY I ask for clarification (on who is being addressed by a comment) in the first place. It happens in the interwebs way too much. I explained this as my reason for seeking clarification the first time. NOT some extreme form of defensiveness over nothing.

You then reply with the above. Fascinating.

You throw around words like "contradicting my earlier posts" when you don't even point out where this so-called contraction is. Then you accuse me of trolling when I've not used a single inflammatory word/statement beyond "talking to the wind". Yet on your end, you flame, toss unfounded accusations, baseless claims, veiled insults and present yourself in a very hostile and abrasive fashion.

Maybe you should read your own posts and my posts and compare the demeanor of how we communicate with each other before you start accusing people of trolling?

Look dude, i had the order wrong, for that Im sorry. I assumed that since they were your posts, you would understand them and that there wouldnt be a need to simplify them, at least not to you. This is chronological order.

1 --

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I did note it. And that's why I addressed you, because it's not coming out like that. His position that one shared feat(Thor's) is more impressive than the other(Superman's) is pretty clear.

Then you replied right after gk's post with the one below.

2 ---

Originally posted by Nibedicus
This is also how I interpreted ODG's argument. I dunno where Delta got his....
Man, this thread has degenerated badly....

And then contradicted yourself with the post below.

3 --

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Of course we agree about how he interpreted what he said. Let me clarify, at that moment we were not interpreting any scans or taking positions on who has better "feats" or whatever.

1 - GK says he supports ODG's position that Thor feat is more impressive than superman's
2 - You say that you interpretated it the same way. So that means you agree that Thor's feat is more impressive than Superman's feat.

3 - You then say that you never took a positoin on who has the better feat.

Now tell tell me does 2 convey the same thing as 3? They are both your posts but are contradicting eachother.

But thanks for trying to explain this. Good Day.

Thor's feat is better.

Originally posted by Diesldude
1 - GK says he supports ODG's position that Thor feat is more impressive than superman's

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I pointed out to Delta what ODG's position really was. That doesn't necessarily mean that I too hold the same opinion.

aright, he was just confirming that he interpreted odg's post the same way without holding a position. Thanks for straightening this out, he wasn't being contradictory and I'm man enough to concede that point to him. But on the scale of things, this is minor, it wasn't even in discussion nor should it have been.

i told him many times that my original post was directed at those who believed superman could not have performed the feat on his own even though he had already sealed his side shut.

There we go. Concession accepted. Time to move on?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
There we go. Concession accepted. Time to move on?

Originally posted by Diesldude
What was that phrase you used? Oh yeah Spectacular hypocrite, well you are a Spectacular Liar. For a man who lives in the basement of a glass house shouldn't be throwing stones. Kindly post the scan that shows the 4 Thors supporting the Multiverse with their God Blast. Holding/supporting the entire house is much greater than fixing a crack on a wall of the sagging house. Only a half wit buffoon will have difficulties correlating this with Thor’s feat, but I MIGHT be giving You way too much credit here.

Originally posted by Diesldude
It’s clearly obvious you had to intentions of countering my point because your premise of Thor supporting ¼ of the Multiverse is a big giant lie. Knowing this little tidbit, you decided to project YOUR hypocrisy onto me and further send this thread into the toilet.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Nice Job Dummy! I applaud you for keeping this thread open, fighting the good fight all based on a false feat from Thor. I wonder how long you can keep up with this façade while assailing unfunny insults from the safe confines of your parent’s basement.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Edit, oh before you think im worked up, I’m not.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Try to counter my point instead of being a wannabe internet thug

Originally posted by Diesldude
why is this so important to you? Yah you weren't contradicting yourself on those 2 posts. But I hope you realized by now who my original post was in response to.

I knew that from 2 pages ago, man. I just took issue to your attitude, I guess. But I think it's best to move on from here and go back to the topic at hand.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I knew that from 2 pages ago, man. I just took issue to your attitude, I guess. But I think it's best to move on from here and go back to the topic at hand.

Lol. A page ago, I mean (thought the debate was longer than one page). Too late to edit.

Originally posted by ODG
LAWL at you still trying to lowball the feat. LAWL at you strawmanning me and calling me a liar on a feat you haven't even seen! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Even Rao Kal El didn't go so far because he at least saw the feat. I wonder how much blood has seeped from your silly a$$. Nobody's trying to be funny here, just showing you up to be a complete buffoon. LOL Oh, btw: IRONY IS IRONY. crylaugh

Simple minded folks such as yourself are easily amused. You're like the stupid kid who at a loss for words can produce only a dumb laugh while standing in the corner reserved for people with bad body order. Like the dumb kid, you fail to realize the joke's on you bud.

I know what feat you are purposely misrepresenting. This is the reason you won't post it. The only thing my ass has been bleeding is this chit Ive been dumping on you retarded diarrhea of your mouth. I guess i've chitted on you enough to reduce you to a laughing simpleton. Go post the scan, you probably even have the comic laying around somewhere in that cluttered basement that you live in.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Simple minded folks such as yourself are easily amused. You're like the stupid kid who at a loss for words can produce only a dumb laugh while standing in the corner reserved for people with bad body order. Like the dumb kid, you fail to realize the joke's on you bud.

I know what feat you are purposely misrepresenting. This is the reason you won't post it. The only thing my ass has been bleeding is this chit Ive been dumping on you retarded diarrhea of your mouth. I guess i've chitted on you enough to reduce you to a laughing simpleton. Go post the scan, you probably even have the comic laying around somewhere in that cluttered basement that you live in.

I'm sure you do know the feat, despite begging me for scans. And I'm sure you can tell us exactly what it is I'm misrepresenting about it. Or you can just pretend that I am without actually explaining what it is you think is wrong and hope that there is some way to salvage your schmuckery. But it's not like I haven't seen this set up for a quaneuver before. As soon as I post it, you'll be like, "Well, no this is what I meant when I said that so the scans don't prove me wrong." So in the interests of a constructive discussion, tell me what I'm purposefully misrepresenting and we'll clear it up. Oh btw:

Originally posted by Diesldude
Then again, your another guy who has nothing better to do than look for fights on the internet. Seriously how old are you?