Thor's Godblast vs Superman's most powerfull HV shot

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Sun has just been attacked by a cannibal planet.

This was the reason why Superman had to heat up the planet.

And while I'm not to versed on IRION and his Astro harnes it has been stated that He can destroy planets with it. But probably he does not has that many feats with it, just things like knocking Sivaa

I was talking about the casual blasts he was firing to seal up the holes. While you can certainly make the argument for all out, Orion's casual blasts in no way come close to the Godblast.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Keep trying, maybe in another 15 or 20 years, you'll be able to tell the difference between an argument and a statement.

Oh that was a statement?

Good think to know.

As for an amped thor nearly killing a *highly weakened* galactus

Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman destroys dominus' body which was created by near infinite amount of souls

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Wasn't that the issue where Superman was inside the thing that was eating the sun... like two pages before? And was right beside the sun at multiple points before then?
Been a while, but if so, seems like some context is missing... hell, he's even glowing in the scan you posted

I was talking about the casual blasts he was firing to seal up the holes. While you can certainly make the argument for all out, Orion's casual blasts in no way come close to the Godblast.

Yes, that was the same issue, every scan I post has issue # so that way people can get the context they need and I don't need to repeat it over and over again. Still OP was asking what Has He done to match the GB, I think that qualifies as, don't you think?

And Why are you thinking is a casual blast? I could say Superman is using his HV "casually" and it does not makes it so.

Not to mention, how overhyped that godblast *nearly killing galactus* feat is.

By Jim starlin, galactus surviving two planets colliding barely

http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad9/ThorOdinson/Thanos0607.jpg
http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad9/ThorOdinson/Thanos0608.jpg
http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad9/ThorOdinson/Thanos0610.jpg

By Jim starlin, superman surviving two planets colliding without any scratch

http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/af191/lgu88/Superman/Crazy%20Feats/DeathOfTheNewGods08a.jpg
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/af191/lgu88/Superman/Crazy%20Feats/DeathOfTheNewGods08b.jpg
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums/af191/lgu88/Superman/Crazy%20Feats/DeathOfTheNewGods08c.jpg

Originally posted by abhilegend
quote:
By Jim starlin, galactus surviving two planets colliding barely

http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/.../Thanos0607.jpg
http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/.../Thanos0608.jpg
http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/.../Thanos0610.jpg

By Jim starlin, superman surviving two planets colliding without any scratch

http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums...eNewGods08a.jpg
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums...eNewGods08b.jpg
http://i1007.photobucket.com/albums...eNewGods08c.jpg

👆 👆

404 errors up the wazoo.

Unless you think Superman > Galactus overall or on the average, I'm not sure what point those comparisons of feats is supposed to mean. Certainly doesn't have anything to do with the Godblast.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Yes, that was the same issue, every scan I post has issue # so that way people can get the context they need and I don't need to repeat it over and over again. Still OP was asking what Has He done to match the GB, I think that qualifies as, don't you think?

And Why are you thinking is a casual blast? I could say Superman is using his HV "casually" and it does not makes it so.

Because it was casual. Look at the effort put forth there.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Not to mention, how overhyped that godblast *nearly killing galactus* feat is.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Just saying he was amped.

Because it was casual. Look at the effort put forth there.

Meh, I attribute that to the sizable nuclear device. Because that's the only way it makes sense for it to also pretty much destroy Hunger too (who was tanking Galactus blasts).

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Unless you think Superman > Galactus overall or on the average, I'm not sure what point those comparisons of feats is supposed to mean. Certainly doesn't have anything to do with the Godblast.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Nuclear bombs>two planets colliding. What a logic bran! It couldn't be *gasp* that hunger was weaksauce in durability as the galactus it faced was highly weakened.
It gives us a measure of how much it takes to kill a *weakened galactus* and it was by the same writer to boot. Wait, godblast isn't a universal force because it *nearly killed galactus*? NOOOOOO.......... Also by bran's logic nukes>godblast.

Fact is, Thanos didn't think two planets colliding was enough so he put a sizable nuclear arsenal in there as well (from a guy who's resources have killed Omega... and created him for that matter as well). Apparently it adds up according to comics. Plus he emphasized on that being the big reason he wasn't staying...

The Galactus it faced one shotted Thanos, so there's that.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
404 errors up the wazoo.

Try Abhi's

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Overeaction!

Fact is, Thanos didn't think two planets colliding was enough so he put a sizable nuclear arsenal in there as well (from a guy who's resources have killed Omega... and created him for that matter as well). Apparently it adds up according to comics. Plus he emphasized on that being the big reason he wasn't staying...

The Galactus it faced one shotted Thanos, so there's that.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift

Because it was casual. Look at the effort put forth there.

They are actually holding a "casual" conversation, even while fighting vs Sivaa, but that does not mean Sivaa is casual threat, the issue reference is on the scan. I'm sure you know how dangerous Sivaa was on that arc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Keep trying, maybe in another 15 or 20 years, you'll be able to tell the difference between an argument and a statement.

Oh one more thing

The earth is flat.

Yes, that is an statement, it doesn't make it right though.

So saying "GB wins" is out of place, as the OP did not even ask for an opinion of "what wins"

Originally posted by abhilegend
That doesn't makes nukes any where close to the energy released by two planets colliding, no matter how much you want to believe it. Hunger absorbed a lot of galactus' power after that scene, if you don't remember it. If thanos*starlin* thinks that nukes>two planets colliding, then he is an idiot.

Didn't Hunger absorb it through Galactus' blasts? I believe he was also taking Thanos' blasts as well.

Suspension of disbelief.

I personally find the whole first 6 issues of Thanos' mini to be all sorts retarded tbh, but Starlin tries to explain it... somewhat.

Just saw your edit. So, your whole point is that Superman > Weakened Galactus by a lot then?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
They are actually holding a "casual" conversation, even while fighting vs Sivaa, but that does not mean Sivaa is casual threat, the issue reference is on the scan. I'm sure you know how dangerous Sivaa was on that arc.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
I think you're taking nukes too literally considering they came from a guy who has ****ed all sorts of shit up with his resources.
There's no denying it was apparently a huge factor in the whole ordeal though.

Didn't Hunger absorb it through Galactus' blasts? I believe he was also taking Thanos' blasts as well.

Suspension of disbelief.

I personally find the whole first 6 issues of Thanos' mini to be all sorts retarded tbh, but Starlin tries to explain it... somewhat.

Just saw your edit. So, your whole point is that Superman > Weakened Galactus by a lot then?

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
While being severely pissed off in appearances and attacks

I hope you are not trying to imply that they sealed a tear in cosmos "casually", because none of them seemed strained while doing it.

Originally posted by abhilegend
You can rationalize it as much as you want bran, nukes aren't adding anything into a planetery collision. Then there is the fact that the collision superman faced combined both planets which requires far more force than shattering both planets. Hunger absorbed galactus' power when it was first released which was after he oneshotted thanos. I find it retarded too, but what work of starlin isn't?

I realize. Which is why his durability didn't seem shit considering he did take decently powerful attacks.

Either way, your stance is Superman took two planets way bigger than Earth combining with barely an injury, while Galactus only took two planets of unknown size colliding?

Superman >>> Weakened Galactus/Hunger then?