hulk vs thanos fist fight

Started by KuRuPT Thanosi97 pages

Originally posted by carver9
More durable than WWH, naah, I disagree. WWH healing factor was insane. During every fight the heros had to use SOMETHING to cancel out his healing factor bc with it he was unstoppable.

Where are you basing this off of, that thanos is strong enough to ko WWH? Who koed him for you to come up with a judgement like that?

Carver I don't know how you figure Zom/Strange was doing nothing to Hulk. He was owning him easily until he got distracted and concerned about collateral damage. Sentry caused him to burnout and essentially stalemated him. Thanos eats people like Sentry for breakfast.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Carver I don't know how you figure Zom/Strange was doing nothing to Hulk. He was owning him easily until he got distracted and concerned about collateral damage. Sentry caused him to burnout and essentially stalemated him. Thanos eats people like Sentry and WWH for breakfast.
👆

Hulk is barely considered a low-mid herald. He might have some nice strength, and a good healing ability, but that's it. He is reckless, he can't fly, he has no versatility, and he is slow. He hasn't beaten characters like Thor who are considered high herald.

With that said, Thanos>Thor>Hulk

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Him being able to take on, Thor as he was during Blood and Thunder and do as well as he did isn't enough?

That one and only feat seems to be the reason for everyone here too.
So If I destroy the feat then Thanos loses his strength right?

Well let's get to it.

First, it is not possible to determine how strong that Thor was, or what strength level he was operating at. I didn't see clearly of that version of Thor being any stronger than say a very serious Thor. He was most likely stronger but much much stronger I doubt. The way Thor was hitting Thanos around (950lb) was as if what a normal Thor could do. I didn't see a difference.

Second, holding your own with someone and going toe to toe doesn't prove one is stronger. I could name many weaker beings that went toe to toe with much stronger opponents yet they seemed almost evenly matched. You guys follow the illogical unwritten rules of who is stronger, I don't. Now if Thor had grappled with Thanos and it was shown that both had the same strength or that Thanos won by overpowering Thor then you guys would have a point. But no h2h grappling occurred. They were just hitting each other back and forth.

Finally, I don't see think this ONE FEAT should be used as a basis for Thanos strength. After all we have high and low showings. This could be either a low showing for Thor or a high one for Thanos. After all, we found out that Gladiator is so much stronger than colossus after their first match.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So a featwhich Hulk and Hulk alone did is proof Thanos couldn't do so?

How about Thanos overpowering the Hulk and the Thing and trading blows with an amping power gem Thor.

I think I got you here Quanchi. Just admit it.

Feats prove who is stronger otherwise you would be a fool for claiming a character is stronger without proof.

Now overpowering Hulk and Thing is nothing since Thing is weak and we don't know the strength level Professor Hulk was operating at.

Also it is not known how strong the gem amped Thor or if it was amping him at all. With that said, you are using unquantifiable feats in order to beat quantifiable ones.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Carver I don't know how you figure Zom/Strange was doing nothing to Hulk. He was owning him easily until he got distracted and concerned about collateral damage. Sentry caused him to burnout and essentially stalemated him. Thanos eats people like Sentry for breakfast.

That was a Sentry that actually used his powers to the fullest so its kind of hard to guage his powers. At that point, Sentry could have been at the way the writers been claiming that his powers is at, million exploding suns and lets not forget, a confident sentry stalemated genis, stalemated the collector, and ripped through madelyn, etc.... It all depends on Sentry mindset and from what have recently been said about Sentry, he will be meeting Surfer very soon along with thor and I cant wait to see the outcome. They also said that they will be fixing his mental powers so that we can see the full scope of sentrys powers.

Zom strange, he was pounding on wwh but it did no lasting damage and I agree, thanos could ko WWH but I think Thanos would fall long before WWH showed any kind of sign of passing out.

Originally posted by h1a8
I think I got you here Quanchi. Just admit it.

Feats prove who is stronger otherwise you would be a fool for claiming a character is stronger without proof.

Now overpowering Hulk and Thing is nothing since Thing is weak and we don't know the strength level Professor Hulk was operating at.

Also it is not known how strong the gem amped Thor or if it was amping him at all. With that said, you are using unquantifiable feats in order to beat quantifiable ones.

So why do you think Doomsday is so strong since he have no lifting feats?

Originally posted by h1a8
I think I got you here Quanchi. Just admit it.

Feats prove who is stronger otherwise you would be a fool for claiming a character is stronger without proof.

Now overpowering Hulk and Thing is nothing since Thing is weak and we don't know the strength level Professor Hulk was operating at.

Also it is not known how strong the gem amped Thor or if it was amping him at all. With that said, you are using unquantifiable feats in order to beat quantifiable ones.

Because if a character takes on someone who has performed an amazing strength feat and overpowers him then that character has shown himself to be stronger without the feats. This is common sense. The only one you have here is yourself.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
Hulk is barely considered a low-mid herald. He might have some nice strength, and a good healing ability, but that's it. He is reckless, he can't fly, he has no versatility, and he is slow. He hasn't beaten characters like Thor who are considered high herald.

With that said, Thanos>Thor>Hulk

This is a fist fight. 😐

Originally posted by h1a8
That one and only feat seems to be the reason for everyone here too.
So If I destroy the feat then Thanos loses his strength right?

Well let's get to it.

First, it is not possible to determine how strong that Thor was, or what strength level he was operating at. I didn't see clearly of that version of Thor being any stronger than say a very serious Thor. He was most likely stronger but much much stronger I doubt. The way Thor was hitting Thanos around (950lb) was as if what a normal Thor could do. I didn't see a difference.

Second, holding your own with someone and going toe to toe doesn't prove one is stronger. I could name many weaker beings that went toe to toe with much stronger opponents yet they seemed almost evenly matched. You guys follow the illogical unwritten rules of who is stronger, I don't. Now if Thor had grappled with Thanos and it was shown that both had the same strength or that Thanos won by overpowering Thor then you guys would have a point. But no h2h grappling occurred. They were just hitting each other back and forth.

Finally, I don't see think this ONE FEAT should be used as a basis for Thanos strength. After all we have high and low showings. This could be either a low showing for Thor or a high one for Thanos. After all, we found out that Gladiator is so much stronger than colossus after their first match.

Jesus H1a8 why do you think this is his only feat? It's far from it. That being said... You didn't disprove anything in your post.. Thor without the PG has NEVER been shown to deal with Surfer and IW with such ease, never. Surfer and Thor have been shown to be pretty much equals, yet Thor dismissed surfer with ease. Of course it was making a difference. Thor dismissed them with ease, while Thanos went toe to toe with him and dished out more than he received. Period. That again was an instance along with many others that try and get a simple point across. Thanos is that much better than any HH.

I already went over the smashing of Hulk and The Thing together. You already conceded that it's quite obvious the Writer and Artist were conveying the message that Thanos is vastly superior to them in strength. They even make Thanos say that very thing... You guys call yourself strong.. I'm strength personified. A very clear message that Thanos is that much above both of them. You also can't fall back on the excuse that we don't know how strong Hulk was. That is irrelevant and this is always an unknown variable in EVERY hulk feat. With some of his lifting feats there isn't a well at this point Hulk is at 25% or 50% anger levels is there?.Nope. There NEVER is such a description for any of his feats, yet you want it for this one or it losses credibility? Come on. For somebody that prides himself on physics, did you miss the classes in logic and critical thinking while you were at school?

How about the feat where Thanos punches Mar-veil from the Moon to Earth in one shot. He didn't just float there he was sent flying like a rocket. Use your physics on that one. Clearly, that took strength and striking power. Him almost killing a High Herald (SS) with very good durability in like 6 punches goes directly to strength and striking power. As mentioned before.. He was locked up in a wrestling match with a powerhouse in drax. The force of the struggle blew up a planet. A very very clear indication of his strength. A mere wrestling match blowing up a planet.. Hmmm. His fight with DP Tyrant also made this point clear... Tyrant CASUALLY dismissed Herald after Herald with EASE. Yet, when he encountered Thanos he says to him.... your stronger than the others.... yes I'm Thanos. They locked up in a wrestling match and Thanos stalemates him for a bit. That along with going blast for blast with him. This clearly indicates a sign of strength and being above people like SS, Brb, Glads etc etc who were casually tossed aside.

Understand this.. The artists and writers over the years have clearly and without question tried to illustrate this point your not getting. They have done it with words and actions. They have shown you Thanos CASUALLY dismissing heralds with a mere slap. When you see a mere slap in movies and said person laughing at the other like a feeb. What do you think they are trying to get across to the audience? Simple.. it's a way to illustrate very clearly that this person is that much more powerful than this person. He only needs a mere slap to end an encounter. Would you not say that is the point trying to be illustrated using the premise of a mere slap? That slap has casually dismissed powerhouses like Hulk, Drax, Hercules, Thing etc etc. I quoted you the words that have been used to represent the difference in strength and power between Thanos and people. Now, its very clear by this and many other things that Thanos is above any high herald and by a very good amount. They have made this point over and over again. I'm not sure why someone like yourself, can't seem to grasp something so basic, that we've been shown over and over again in comics. Not just by words but by illustrations. What were they trying to illustrate....Thanos is just that strong. Period.

Originally posted by h1a8
That one and only feat seems to be the reason for everyone here too.
So If I destroy the feat then Thanos loses his strength right?

Well let's get to it.

First, it is not possible to determine how strong that Thor was, or what strength level he was operating at. I didn't see clearly of that version of Thor being any stronger than say a very serious Thor. He was most likely stronger but much much stronger I doubt. The way Thor was hitting Thanos around (950lb) was as if what a normal Thor could do. I didn't see a difference.

Second, holding your own with someone and going toe to toe doesn't prove one is stronger. I could name many weaker beings that went toe to toe with much stronger opponents yet they seemed almost evenly matched. You guys follow the illogical unwritten rules of who is stronger, I don't. Now if Thor had grappled with Thanos and it was shown that both had the same strength or that Thanos won by overpowering Thor then you guys would have a point. But no h2h grappling occurred. They were just hitting each other back and forth.

Finally, I don't see think this ONE FEAT should be used as a basis for Thanos strength. After all we have high and low showings. This could be either a low showing for Thor or a high one for Thanos. After all, we found out that Gladiator is so much stronger than colossus after their first match.

👆

Originally posted by BUSTER1
👆

Thumbs up after I just trashed his argument and gave more examples. That = fail

Originally posted by h1a8
That one and only feat seems to be the reason for everyone here too.
So If I destroy the feat then Thanos loses his strength right?

Well let's get to it.

First, it is not possible to determine how strong that Thor was, or what strength level he was operating at. I didn't see clearly of that version of Thor being any stronger than say a very serious Thor. He was most likely stronger but much much stronger I doubt. The way Thor was hitting Thanos around (950lb) was as if what a normal Thor could do. I didn't see a difference.

Second, holding your own with someone and going toe to toe doesn't prove one is stronger. I could name many weaker beings that went toe to toe with much stronger opponents yet they seemed almost evenly matched. You guys follow the illogical unwritten rules of who is stronger, I don't. Now if Thor had grappled with Thanos and it was shown that both had the same strength or that Thanos won by overpowering Thor then you guys would have a point. But no h2h grappling occurred. They were just hitting each other back and forth.

Finally, I don't see think this ONE FEAT should be used as a basis for Thanos strength. After all we have high and low showings. This could be either a low showing for Thor or a high one for Thanos. After all, we found out that Gladiator is so much stronger than colossus after their first match.

Are you serious.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Jesus H1a8 why do you think this is his only feat? It's far from it. That being said... You didn't disprove anything in your post.. Thor without the PG has NEVER been shown to deal with Surfer and IW with such ease, never. Surfer and Thor have been shown to be pretty much equals, yet Thor dismissed surfer with ease. Of course it was making a difference. Thor dismissed them with ease, while Thanos went toe to toe with him and dished out more than he received. Period. That again was an instance along with many others that try and get a simple point across. Thanos is that much better than any HH.

I already went over the smashing of Hulk and The Thing together. You already conceded that it's quite obvious the Writer and Artist were conveying the message that Thanos is vastly superior to them in strength. They even make Thanos say that very thing... You guys call yourself strong.. I'm strength personified. A very clear message that Thanos is that much above both of them. You also can't fall back on the excuse that we don't know how strong Hulk was. That is irrelevant and this is always an unknown variable in EVERY hulk feat. With some of his lifting feats there isn't a well at this point Hulk is at 25% or 50% anger levels is there?.Nope. There NEVER is such a description for any of his feats, yet you want it for this one or it losses credibility? Come on. For somebody that prides himself on physics, did you miss the classes in logic and critical thinking while you were at school?

How about the feat where Thanos punches Mar-veil from the Moon to Earth in one shot. He didn't just float there he was sent flying like a rocket. Use your physics on that one. Clearly, that took strength and striking power. Him almost killing a High Herald (SS) with very good durability in like 6 punches goes directly to strength and striking power. As mentioned before.. He was locked up in a wrestling match with a powerhouse in drax. The force of the struggle blew up a planet. A very very clear indication of his strength. A mere wrestling match blowing up a planet.. Hmmm. His fight with DP Tyrant also made this point clear... Tyrant CASUALLY dismissed Herald after Herald with EASE. Yet, when he encountered Thanos he says to him.... your stronger than the others.... yes I'm Thanos. They locked up in a wrestling match and Thanos stalemates him for a bit. That along with going blast for blast with him. This clearly indicates a sign of strength and being above people like SS, Brb, Glads etc etc who were casually tossed aside.

Understand this.. The artists and writers over the years have clearly and without question tried to illustrate this point your not getting. They have done it with words and actions. They have shown you Thanos CASUALLY dismissing heralds with a mere slap. When you see a mere slap in movies and said person laughing at the other like a feeb. What do you think they are trying to get across to the audience? Simple.. it's a way to illustrate very clearly that this person is that much more powerful than this person. He only needs a mere slap to end an encounter. Would you not say that is the point trying to be illustrated using the premise of a mere slap? That slap has casually dismissed powerhouses like Hulk, Drax, Hercules, Thing etc etc. I quoted you the words that have been used to represent the difference in strength and power between Thanos and people. Now, its very clear by this and many other things that Thanos is above any high herald and by a very good amount. They have made this point over and over again. I'm not sure why someone like yourself, can't seem to grasp something so basic, that we've been shown over and over again in comics. Not just by words but by illustrations. What were they trying to illustrate....Thanos is just that strong. Period.

Still waiting H1a8

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Jesus H1a8 why do you think this is his only feat? It's far from it. That being said... You didn't disprove anything in your post.. Thor without the PG has NEVER been shown to deal with Surfer and IW with such ease, never. Surfer and Thor have been shown to be pretty much equals, yet Thor dismissed surfer with ease. Of course it was making a difference. Thor dismissed them with ease, while Thanos went toe to toe with him and dished out more than he received. Period. That again was an instance along with many others that try and get a simple point across. Thanos is that much better than any HH.
That fight was bs and cannot be used. Why? Because SS was fighting dumb and missing a Thor that was floating still in space without his hammer. Everyone knows that SS will outclass most versions of Thor due to his superior speed and reflexes. With that said, normal Thor holds back a lot. Blood and Thunder Thor didn't. Although he beat SS he didn't dismiss him that easily. They battle for a decent amount of time, just about the same length normal Thor battled SS. You know how WM Thor won? He did my famous combo to ko principle. See, it works in comics too.

I already went over the smashing of Hulk and The Thing together. You already conceded that it's quite obvious the Writer and Artist were conveying the message that Thanos is vastly superior to them in strength. They even make Thanos say that very thing... You guys call yourself strong.. I'm strength personified. A very clear message that Thanos is that much above both of them. You also can't fall back on the excuse that we don't know how strong Hulk was. That is irrelevant and this is always an unknown variable in EVERY hulk feat. With some of his lifting feats there isn't a well at this point Hulk is at 25% or 50% anger levels is there?.Nope. There NEVER is such a description for any of his feats, yet you want it for this one or it losses credibility? Come on. For somebody that prides himself on physics, did you miss the classes in logic and critical thinking while you were at school?
Being stronger than Thing is nothing. Hulk's strength is variable and utterly random so it is not possible to know how much strength Thanos was struggling with against Hulk. Thus any feats against Hulk cannot be used unless that same Hulk performed a feat of his own right before the incident.

The bottom line is : Anyone overpowering a random Hulk doesn't prove they are stronger than Thor at his best.


How about the feat where Thanos punches Mar-veil from the Moon to Earth in one shot. He didn't just float there he was sent flying like a rocket. Use your physics on that one. Clearly, that took strength and striking power. Him almost killing a High Herald (SS) with very good durability in like 6 punches goes directly to strength and striking power. As mentioned before.. He was locked up in a wrestling match with a powerhouse in drax. The force of the struggle blew up a planet. A very very clear indication of his strength. A mere wrestling match blowing up a planet.. Hmmm. His fight with DP Tyrant also made this point clear... Tyrant CASUALLY dismissed Herald after Herald with EASE. Yet, when he encountered Thanos he says to him.... your stronger than the others.... yes I'm Thanos. They locked up in a wrestling match and Thanos stalemates him for a bit. That along with going blast for blast with him. This clearly indicates a sign of strength and being above people like SS, Brb, Glads etc etc who were casually tossed aside.
When Thanos punched Marvel they were in space (gravity is negligible). Thus MA is the only force needed to be calculated. I will calculate it later. But I assure you that the feat is lower than Thor hitting his uncle to space and definitely Superman hitting Lobo to space.

I would like to see that Drax scan though. If it pans out then this will be finally the proof I'm looking for. I believe Tyrant was referring to power and not physical strength. I would like to see the scans where they locked up. But now you at least did what Quanchi and the other Thanos supporters couldn't do. What is sad is that Rage (an avid Thor fan) even says Thanos is stronger than Thor and could only tell me why because of his hits on SS. He couldn't even offer the other instances as you did.

Understand this.. The artists and writers over the years have clearly and without question tried to illustrate this point your not getting. They have done it with words and actions. They have shown you Thanos CASUALLY dismissing heralds with a mere slap. When you see a mere slap in movies and said person laughing at the other like a feeb. What do you think they are trying to get across to the audience? Simple.. it's a way to illustrate very clearly that this person is that much more powerful than this person. He only needs a mere slap to end an encounter. Would you not say that is the point trying to be illustrated using the premise of a mere slap? That slap has casually dismissed powerhouses like Hulk, Drax, Hercules, Thing etc etc. I quoted you the words that have been used to represent the difference in strength and power between Thanos and people. Now, its very clear by this and many other things that Thanos is above any high herald and by a very good amount. They have made this point over and over again. I'm not sure why someone like yourself, can't seem to grasp something so basic, that we've been shown over and over again in comics. Not just by words but by illustrations. What were they trying to illustrate....Thanos is just that strong. Period. [/B][/QUOTE] Sorry but I don't see the writer showing a slap to show one being superior to another in pure strength. I see it as the writer making Thanos think that he is when it is still up for question. With that said, I still like to see those scans of Drax and Tyrant. That may be enough for me, who knows.

Just so you know. I don't consider being stronger than a random professor Hulk as being stronger than Thor. I don't consider being able to ko SS in 6 hits, Thanos hitting Marvel, winning against heralds, and mere brawls with no grappling as proof either.

^

Can you prove Surfer has superior reflexes than Thor?

Originally posted by carver9
That was a Sentry that actually used his powers to the fullest

I dont want this to turn into a WWH vrs Sentry thread, but this statement is wrong. Sentry using his powers to the fullest wouldnt have sat there taking shots from WWH while smiling. He would have moved. Actually, Sentry usimg his powers to the fullest would have meant never being hit by WWH.

Just thought i'd clear that up.

Originally posted by h1a8
That fight was bs and cannot be used. Why? Because SS was fighting dumb and missing a Thor that was floating still in space without his hammer. Everyone knows that SS will outclass most versions of Thor due to his superior speed and reflexes. With that said, normal Thor holds back a lot. Blood and Thunder Thor didn't. Although he beat SS he didn't dismiss him that easily. They battle for a decent amount of time, just about the same length normal Thor battled SS. You know how WM Thor won? He did my famous combo to ko principle. See, it works in comics too.
Being stronger than Thing is nothing. Hulk's strength is variable and utterly random so it is not possible to know how much strength Thanos was struggling with against Hulk. Thus any feats against Hulk cannot be used unless that same Hulk performed a feat of his own right before the incident.

The bottom line is : Anyone overpowering a random Hulk doesn't prove they are stronger than Thor at his best.

When Thanos punched Marvel they were in space (gravity is negligible). Thus MA is the only force needed to be calculated. I will calculate it later. But I assure you that the feat is lower than Thor hitting his uncle to space and definitely Superman hitting Lobo to space.

I would like to see that Drax scan though. If it pans out then this will be finally the proof I'm looking for. I believe Tyrant was referring to power and not physical strength. I would like to see the scans where they locked up. But now you at least did what Quanchi and the other Thanos supporters couldn't do. What is sad is that Rage (an avid Thor fan) even says Thanos is stronger than Thor and could only tell me why because of his hits on SS. He couldn't even offer the other instances as you did.

Understand this.. The artists and writers over the years have clearly and without question tried to illustrate this point your not getting. They have done it with words and actions. They have shown you Thanos CASUALLY dismissing heralds with a mere slap. When you see a mere slap in movies and said person laughing at the other like a feeb. What do you think they are trying to get across to the audience? Simple.. it's a way to illustrate very clearly that this person is that much more powerful than this person. He only needs a mere slap to end an encounter. Would you not say that is the point trying to be illustrated using the premise of a mere slap? That slap has casually dismissed powerhouses like Hulk, Drax, Hercules, Thing etc etc. I quoted you the words that have been used to represent the difference in strength and power between Thanos and people. Now, its very clear by this and many other things that Thanos is above any high herald and by a very good amount. They have made this point over and over again. I'm not sure why someone like yourself, can't seem to grasp something so basic, that we've been shown over and over again in comics. Not just by words but by illustrations. What were they trying to illustrate....Thanos is just that strong. Period.

Sorry but I don't see the writer showing a slap to show one being superior to another in pure strength. I see it as the writer making Thanos think that he is when it is still up for question. With that said, I still like to see those scans of Drax and Tyrant. That may be enough for me, who knows.

Just so you know. I don't consider being stronger than a random professor Hulk as being stronger than Thor. I don't consider being able to ko SS in 6 hits, Thanos hitting Marvel, winning against heralds, and mere brawls with no grappling as proof either. [/B][/QUOTE]

I guess the logic classes were swept under the rug I see....

1. Show me one lifting feat... fighting feat... or any feat with hulk that gives us an exact measurement of how anger and strong he is. This doesn't happen and you know it. Yet for some reason you require that for this particular feat. We know hulk wasn't exactly happy and was pissed and trying to put Thanos down. Period. That is a good enough for most people to understand that Hulk was strong and yet a feeb compared to Thanos. So, as you can see it doesn't matter how pissed hulk was and that is never stated. What we know is hulk is really strong and hulk was angry and trying to put Thanos down. Period. How about the fact that a well known Hulk writer was SPECIFICALLY asked a question about how Hulks strength compares to Thanos. He said... Thanos is in another weight class than Hulk and that is just the way it is. You have one of Hulk own writers for years saying Hulk is no match for thanos and even in reference to strength. Yet that isn't good enough for you. Hmmm seems to fit rather nicely with how easily he dismisses him doesn't it?

2. The problem with your conclusion on what a mere slap means is painful evident. You see your claim is that a mere slap doesn't show superiority to someone else, only that Thanos wants them and us to believe he is. The problem with this H1a9 and again why logic fails you, is that nothing is done about it. You act like he slaps people and then all of a sudden he gets owned. False. He slaps people effortlessly and it puts them down or if it doesn't he still proceeds to own them. You would have a point if he slapped people and then got owned. However, that isn't even close to what happens. So yes, that is exactly why a mere slap means so much. You see writers and artists as I said try and convey this point over and over again but it appears your too blind and bias to accept it. When someone slaps another with a mere slap and can put them down, while laughing at them for even stepping to him, and they can do nothing about it.. That is a clear cut way to show someone is that much stronger than other right? I can't believe your arguing this point. It would be like someone using one finger to flick another in the head and it knocks them down and they get laughed at. Yet you wanna believe this doesn't show a clear superiority in strength and power lol. Okay...yet when doing this to clear powerhouses like Drax, Hulk, Herc, Thing etc.. means to you.. nothing haha.

3. Thanos punching Mar-veil from the Moon to earth just exactly how strong and how much force Thanos can hit with. One shot.. and Mar-veil goes flying like a rocket. Yet Mar-veil was exchanging shots with Thanos yet Thanos didn't go anywhere. Hmmmm. Yet again the writer and author trying to illustrate how much power Thanos as again he easily gets ride of a herald level character.

4. Are you actually arguing that strength isn't included in striking power? Are you actually arguing this point? You know that strength is an aspect of striking power. Thus Thanos almost killing SS with 6 punches IS a sign of his strength

5. In general you just aren't seeming to grasp the fact that Thanos has always been portrayed as being above an HH and by a good amount. That is why he often only needs mere slaps to dismiss them. That is why he laughs at them and mocks their strength. Do you know why he's never lost to any HH before H1a8... Hmmmm because he is that much more powerful than them. That is just how it is buddy and the sooner you start realizing this the better. When you notice that he always deals with these characters and beats them, either easily or with minimum effort it becomes clear what they are trying to convey. It only requires basic logic and reason. They are trying to convey that Thanos is that much stronger/powerful than any of them. Hence the reason he doesn't take any losses to them. Seems very logical right? So.. what then is the issue? You tell me then if its not strength that makes Thanos superior and doesn't lose to HH then why is it? You must agree he doesn't lose for whatever reason.. Yet wanna believe Supes is somehow differnt? That Thor is stronger? lol. Thor has never beaten Thanos EVER. Why is that then h1a8

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Sorry but I don't see the writer showing a slap to show one being superior to another in pure strength. I see it as the writer making Thanos think that he is when it is still up for question. With that said, I still like to see those scans of Drax and Tyrant. That may be enough for me, who knows.

I guess the logic classes were swept under the rug I see....

1. Show me one lifting feat... fighting feat... or any feat with hulk that gives us an exact measurement of how anger and strong he is. This doesn't happen and you know it. Yet for some reason you require that for this particular feat. We know hulk wasn't exactly happy and was pissed and trying to put Thanos down. Period. That is a good enough for most people to understand that Hulk was strong and yet a feeb compared to Thanos. So, as you can see it doesn't matter how pissed hulk was and that is never stated. What we know is hulk is really strong and hulk was angry and trying to put Thanos down. Period. How about the fact that a well known Hulk writer was SPECIFICALLY asked a question about how Hulks strength compares to Thanos. He said... Thanos is in another weight class than Hulk and that is just the way it is. You have one of Hulk own writers for years saying Hulk is no match for thanos and even in reference to strength. Yet that isn't good enough for you. Hmmm seems to fit rather nicely with how easily he dismisses him doesn't it?

2. The problem with your conclusion on what a mere slap means is painful evident. You see your claim is that a mere slap doesn't show superiority to someone else, only that Thanos wants them and us to believe he is. The problem with this H1a9 and again why logic fails you, is that nothing is done about it. You act like he slaps people and then all of a sudden he gets owned. False. He slaps people effortlessly and it puts them down or if it doesn't he still proceeds to own them. You would have a point if he slapped people and then got owned. However, that isn't even close to what happens. So yes, that is exactly why a mere slap means so much. You see writers and artists as I said try and convey this point over and over again but it appears your too blind and bias to accept it. When someone slaps another with a mere slap and can put them down, while laughing at them for even stepping to him, and they can do nothing about it.. That is a clear cut way to show someone is that much stronger than other right? I can't believe your arguing this point. It would be like someone using one finger to flick another in the head and it knocks them down and they get laughed at. Yet you wanna believe this doesn't show a clear superiority in strength and power lol. Okay...yet when doing this to clear powerhouses like Drax, Hulk, Herc, Thing etc.. means to you.. nothing haha.

3. Thanos punching Mar-veil from the Moon to earth just exactly how strong and how much force Thanos can hit with. One shot.. and Mar-veil goes flying like a rocket. Yet Mar-veil was exchanging shots with Thanos yet Thanos didn't go anywhere. Hmmmm. Yet again the writer and author trying to illustrate how much power Thanos as again he easily gets ride of a herald level character.

4. Are you actually arguing that strength isn't included in striking power? Are you actually arguing this point? You know that strength is an aspect of striking power. Thus Thanos almost killing SS with 6 punches IS a sign of his strength

5. In general you just aren't seeming to grasp the fact that Thanos has always been portrayed as being above an HH and by a good amount. That is why he often only needs mere slaps to dismiss them. That is why he laughs at them and mocks their strength. Do you know why he's never lost to any HH before H1a8... Hmmmm because he is that much more powerful than them. That is just how it is buddy and the sooner you start realizing this the better. When you notice that he always deals with these characters and beats them, either easily or with minimum effort it becomes clear what they are trying to convey. It only requires basic logic and reason. They are trying to convey that Thanos is that much stronger/powerful than any of them. Hence the reason he doesn't take any losses to them. Seems very logical right? So.. what then is the issue? You tell me then if its not strength that makes Thanos superior and doesn't lose to HH then why is it? You must agree he doesn't lose for whatever reason.. Yet wanna believe Supes is somehow differnt? That Thor is stronger? lol. Thor has never beaten Thanos EVER. Why is that then h1a8


If you're talking about the instance I'm thinking of he didn't just knock him to Earth from the moon, it was from Saturn...

http://img237.imageshack.us/i/85157929fi8.jpg/
http://img267.imageshack.us/i/99415456lx9.jpg/

But fair warning, I heard a while back that the comic might not be canon. I can't say for sure one way or the other for sure though.

Originally posted by tkitna
I dont want this to turn into a WWH vrs Sentry thread, but this statement is wrong. Sentry using his powers to the fullest wouldnt have sat there taking shots from WWH while smiling. He would have moved. Actually, Sentry usimg his powers to the fullest would have meant never being hit by WWH.

Just thought i'd clear that up.

This is true.

Originally posted by darthgoober
If you're talking about the instance I'm thinking of he didn't just knock him to Earth from the moon, it was from Saturn...

http://img237.imageshack.us/i/85157929fi8.jpg/
http://img267.imageshack.us/i/99415456lx9.jpg/

But fair warning, I heard a while back that the comic might not be canon. I can't say for sure one way or the other for sure though.

It's non cannon i believe its from Marvel adventures #17