Twilight Saga:best movie franchise in history?

lol

K.

So I have an answer to the thread's question: no.

All box office money added together doesn't even equal one avatar film. If the second even does half as well as the first, it will still be better than both original films put together... (by the time Avatar has had it's fill, of course.)

Doesn't there need to be at least two films before Avatar can be considered a franchise?

Hi.

The Question: Twilight Saga:best movie franchise in history?

My Answer: Hell to the No!

A movies are basically 3 very long episodes of "one tree hill" with vampires. It deserves no respect, bub.

But, to each his own. If you like 90210 with fangs, have at it. If you're a fan you're a fan. Even if it's like Dawson's creek with Dracula's creek. But best movie franchise in history?, not by a long shot.

Originally posted by Robtard
Doesn't there need to be at least two films before Avatar can be considered a franchise?

Nah.

One is definite.

3rd is most likely.

Win.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Hi.

The Question: Twilight Saga:best movie franchise in history?

My Answer: Hell to the No!

A movies are basically 3 very long episodes of "one tree hill" with vampires. It deserves no respect, bub.

But, to each his own. If you like 90210 with fangs, have at it. If you're a fan you're a fan. Even if it's like Dawson's creek with Dracula's creek. But best movie franchise in history?, not by a long shot.

Wow...you really went out there with the jokes about shitty tv-shows/vampires

Twilight is bad. It is overrated by some girls.