Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Started by supremthor28 pages

Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

who can take the most punishment.

Thor,Superman, Silver Surfer, Captain Marvel Billy

1. Cyclops Full Optic blast
2. 20 punches from WWhulk
3. Megaton Nuke ground zero
4. Goku's ss3 kamehameha 😉
5. Planet explosion
6. Sun Core
7. Super Nova ground zero
8. A year in a Black Hole
9. Full Blast from Thanos and Darkseid(no OBP)
10. Anti-Matter Wave

Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Originally posted by supremthor
who can take the most punishment.

1. Cyclops Full Optic blast
2. 20 punches from WWhulk
3. Megaton Nuke ground zero
4. Goku's ss3 kamehameha 😉
5. Planet explosion
6. Sun Core
7. Super Nova ground zero
8. A year in a Black Hole
9. Full Blast from Thanos and Darkseid(no OBP)
10. Anti-Matter Wave

Who do you mean by "Marvel?"

fixed

SS

Great way to include DBZ. 👆

Superman doesn't do the super nova one, and should be assumed Marvel or Thor don't either. Surfer probably can. He also stands the best chance of walking away with the least damage from WWH, but that's the only difference I see. Although SM went all skeletal when he went into the core once... meh, he came back.

9 and 10 aren't passable, and 8 is a big question.

But then Goku has one more form to show (SS4), and takes out everyone.

Surfer is the most durable

They all stop at 4.

They all take it to 10 and they die there

Instead of all these situations... why not ask in general who is more durable and has the feats to back it up.. Superman, Thor, SS or Marvel

Cuz it will turn into another personal opinion. They are all about even

I pretty much agree they are all in the same ballpark.

I want to say Superman because it seems to me he would handle Darkseid's omega beams best (though isn't that because Superman is especially protected from them by the Source?). But in terms of overall feats, the most durable one here is probably Surfer.

Antimatter is a tricky issue. Really, nothing made of ordinary matter should survive contact with it. So unless there's a forcefield involved (bioaura?), or subatomically reengineered matter (galactic glaze?), antimatter stops everyone.

Superman for me is the most durable, but i can see them all being stopped at around the same level.

Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

1. Cyclops Full Optic blast - They all shrug it off.
2. 20 punches from World War Hulk - Neither are harmed in any important way, but Norrin comes out looking better. I mean he is shiny.
3. Megaton Nuke ground zero - They all shrug it off.
4. Goku's ss3 kamehameha - The ****?
5. Planet explosion - I know Superman, Thor, and Norrin can all shrug it off. Don't know if Marvel's ever taken such an attack. But he probably tanks it as well.
6. Sun Core - I know Superman, Thor and Norrin are all unharmed. I don't know Marvel's durability towards heat, but his probably around there level and should be fine.
7. Super Nova ground zero - Silver Surfer. Super Nova's and cosmic things are his shtick.
8. A year in a Black Hole - None of them have survived in something like a black hole for this long.
9. Full Blast from Thanos and Darkseid(no OBP) - From both at the same time? I think Thor has the best chance of being alive.
10. Anti-Matter Wave - Anti-Monitor anti-matter wave from CoIE? Neither survive.

They're all in the same ball park. Thor has the greatest damage soak in my opinion, while Norrin comes out looking the best when it comes to cosmetic details.

Re: Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Originally posted by Naija boy
Surfer is the most durable

Originally posted by -Pr-
Superman for me is the most durable

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Thor has the greatest damage soak in my opinion
🙂

cyclops stomps

Re: Re: Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Originally posted by Mindset
🙂

😂

You're just made Hercules wasn't in this thread, and you couldn't argue that Hercules was retconned into being invulnerable.

Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Originally posted by supremthor
who can take the most punishment.

Thor,Superman, Silver Surfer, Captain Marvel Billy

1. Cyclops Full Optic blast
2. 20 punches from WWhulk
3. Megaton Nuke ground zero
4. Goku's ss3 kamehameha 😉
5. Planet explosion
6. Sun Core
7. Super Nova ground zero
8. A year in a Black Hole
9. Full Blast from Thanos and Darkseid(no OBP)
10. Anti-Matter Wave

Black holes contain solar energy right? If so Superman can stay in indefinitely. Seriously, SS in a black hole is contributed to more his energy manipulation powers and not durability. SS can negate gravity, absorb, transmute, etc. With that said, CM can't, Thor can't, and Superman maybe can only if he can continued to be fed solar energy.

Silver Surfer can't take 20 WWhulk punches, the others probably can though.

I don't know if Marvel can survive the core of the sun (I would say no). Thor seeming went into the sun one time, but I don't think it was the core. Even so, I'm stuck on the idea that Thor either had some protective magicial shield going on or it was plain PIS. I would never ever believe Thor can survive even on the surface of the Sun. Don't bother arguing this with me, I'm stuck on eternity with it, so it would be hopeless. SS can't survive the core of the sun but he can survive inside the sun. And Superman can because of obvious reasons.

Thor can't survive a Super nova, neither can SS or Marvel. Superman would be koed or killed himself.

All can easily survive Blasts from Thanos (easy stuff here). But all will be pretty hurt or killed from DS's blast. What is OBP?

Superman and Thor can both survive a planet explosion. I doubt CM can. And only an amped SS can.

Don't know about the anti-matter wave.

Re: Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Originally posted by h1a8
Black holes contain solar energy right? If so Superman can stay in indefinitely. Seriously, SS in a black hole is contributed to more his energy manipulation powers and not durability. SS can negate gravity, absorb, transmute, etc. With that said, CM can't, Thor can't, and Superman maybe can only if he can continued to be fed solar energy.

Silver Surfer can't take 20 WWhulk punches, the others probably can though.

I don't know if Marvel can survive the core of the sun (I would say no). Thor seeming went into the sun one time, but I don't think it was the core. Even so, I'm stuck on the idea that Thor either had some protective magicial shield going on or it was plain PIS. I would never ever believe Thor can survive even on the surface of the Sun. Don't bother arguing this with me, I'm stuck on eternity with it, so it would be hopeless. SS can't survive the core of the sun but he can survive inside the sun. And Superman can because of obvious reasons.

Thor can't survive a Super nova, neither can SS or Marvel. Superman would be koed or killed himself.

All can easily survive Blasts from Thanos (easy stuff here). But all will be pretty hurt or killed from DS's blast. What is OBP?

Superman and Thor can both survive a planet explosion. I doubt CM can. And only an amped SS can.

Don't know about the anti-matter wave.

You are an idiot. It is official. You don't read SS do you.. he's already survived things you say he can't survive.. just stop posting.

Re: Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable

Originally posted by h1a8
Black holes contain solar energy right? If so Superman can stay in indefinitely. Seriously, SS in a black hole is contributed to more his energy manipulation powers and not durability. SS can negate gravity, absorb, transmute, etc. With that said, CM can't, Thor can't, and Superman maybe can only if he can continued to be fed solar energy.

Silver Surfer can't take 20 WWhulk punches, the others probably can though.

I don't know if Marvel can survive the core of the sun (I would say no). Thor seeming went into the sun one time, but I don't think it was the core. Even so, I'm stuck on the idea that Thor either had some protective magicial shield going on or it was plain PIS. I would never ever believe Thor can survive even on the surface of the Sun. Don't bother arguing this with me, I'm stuck on eternity with it, so it would be hopeless. SS can't survive the core of the sun but he can survive inside the sun. And Superman can because of obvious reasons.

Thor can't survive a Super nova, neither can SS or Marvel. Superman would be koed or killed himself.

All can easily survive Blasts from Thanos (easy stuff here). But all will be pretty hurt or killed from DS's blast. What is OBP?

Superman and Thor can both survive a planet explosion. I doubt CM can. And only an amped SS can.

Don't know about the anti-matter wave.

LOL! I laughed my ass off. Seriously, keep it up yo. 👆

You're entire post is just ridiculous in general but in specific because I care about Thor the most.....

Thor was in the Sun's core as it was stated they were in the Sun's blazing heart as I recall and he did not have any magical shielding.

You think that's P.I.S? Wow, you must have a heart attack whenever you read Thor tanking the cosmic flame of a blood lusted Firelord, which in the same instance was stated to be born in the raging heart of a million suns. There's also the instance where Thor charged his hammer with the energy of a thousand Suns, and he held his hammer just fine and was tanking the energy released.