Thor vs. Green Lantern (Hal)

Started by iceman245679 pages

Thor

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Not before Hal goes intangible! 😛

Nah, Hal can just Krona bust him.

From behind. 😄

Thing thing about GL's, is that have pretty major tactical advantages between auto shields that can take attacks even Supermans durability would have trouble with, the ability to form an army of constructs at the same time, and attacks that can come at any angle, all which can travel at trans warp speeds.

Thor wins because I am just too afraid to argue against the majority.

Definetely Thor

thor

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor wins because I am just too afraid to argue against the majority.

Mindset didn't comment, so majority opinion doesn't count. 😉

Didn't PR say we could use pre-crisis examples?

No one cares what Paul said.

Thor 7/10.

Meh, all that matters is Kyle beats Hal, Thor, and Superman.

So whatever.

thor wins 7/10 at least. Thor is built to kill green lanterns. He can take any thing hal can dish out and on top of that hes a top tier brick.

He can't take a Krona buster.

IMO, a top GL can take a majority against Superman or Thor, considering a single high end construct can match either of them physically, and they can create an army of them..

Not to mention, all of their beams are seekers. If Hal wants to hit Thor in the eyes, he's hitting him in the eyes.

^^ Didnt regular superman once break through hals protective shield force barrier, hence in doing so he shocked hal..

Originally posted by ozz81
^^ Didnt regular superman once break through hals protective shield force barrier, hence in doing so he shocked hal..

Maybe, but Hal's shield also protected him and Superman from an explosion that would have hurt Supes. GL constructs have low and high showings, like anything else, but at their best they can take multiple Superboy Prime punches, or other attacks that would normally hurt the Superman/Captain Marvel tier.

Originally posted by cdtm
He can't take a Krona buster.

IMO, a top GL can take a majority against Superman or Thor, considering a single high end construct can match either of them physically, and they can create an army of them..

Not to mention, all of their beams are seekers. If Hal wants to hit Thor in the eyes, he's hitting him in the eyes.

Did you see what Hal did in the last issue? Blew an aliens head clean off. Bad ass scene. Hal could do Krona blasts every issue and people would still say Thor.

A lot of Hal and Barry Allen hate on the boards.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101211135358AAuYqL8

Hal wins due to his alien ladyboy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKtQcynLiLE

Hal can't take a Godblast or his own Krona Buster sent back at him with 10-100x power.

What's your point?

Thor's average is superior to that of Hal's. And his best is better than Hal's, too.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Hal can't take a Godblast or his own Krona Buster sent back at him with 10-100x power.

What's your point?

Thor's average is superior to that of Hal's. And his best is better than Hal's, too.

Thor has numerous showings like having trouble with normal Savage Hulk in a slugfest. As averages go, Thors no better or worse than Hal..

And no, Hal can't take a Godblast to the face, but unlike the Godblast all of Hal's attacks can be auto aimed. He could simply point his finger at the ground if he wanted to, and send a major attack directly for Thors head while Thor's still trying to line Hal up with an attack. Or he could whip up five or six constructs to attack Thor from all angles.

And while Thor's hammer toss also auto tracks, imo Hal's defenses can overcome the throw. He can probably even outrace the hammer.

There's very few beings who wouldn't have trouble with Savage Hulk in a slug fest, though. Hal would certainly get his shit kicked in before long under those circumstances.

Thor compensates by being able to effect a massive radius/AoE with his attacks more so than what a typical Green Lantern can, even Hal. Thor can summon massive meterogical/weather manipulation that can dictate the course of the battle, omniblast, etc. His power output as a whole exceeds that of Hal's.

Mjolnir and the defenses it provides for virtually most of what a power ring can manifest is an obstacle that is just too steep for a typical GL to overcome, unfortunately. And yes, I'm fully aware Lanterns can beat energy manipulators as evidenced by history with Manhunters, but firstly, Mjolnir's draining capabilities, frankly, take a dump on the Manhunters. Secondly, there's no way in hell Hal can "recharge" his ring from Mjolnir's absorbed energies in the same way he could a Manhunter's head cavity, not unless Thor was a nice guy and let him.

Thor, for all intents and purposes, is an anti-thesis to Green Lantern types, who operate with very finite and exhaustible energy reserves.

Well, GL shields have defended against attacks that hurt, say, Martian Manhunter or Superman, so odds are they can take some of Thor's omni attacks. Something like his omni Godblast might be another story, but that didn't exactly have a big radius in Ragnarok..

But tell me this: How much protection can Thor's hammer really give him against someone that doesn't even need to aim his attacks? Lets say Hal uses his ring to send an attack away from him, around Thor, and at his back? He's done it before.. Lots of GL's have.

Giving Thor the benefit of the doubt that he sees and blocks it, what about the next attack? What about those three constructs Hal beams to his left, right, and behind?

My main issue with Thor vs energy manipulators, is it's taken as a given that Thor WILL block their attacks, absorb it, and send it back at him, as if his hammer can't be bypassed, either by simply aiming where he's not blocking, or attacking him on multiple fronts.