Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Originally posted by Peach
Actually, people say that sort of thing all the time. If a girl dresses in the least bit sexily, they're a whore and were asking for anything that happens afterwards. It's a completely disgusting attitude that I hugely take exception to. And DDM's first post where he throws "hooker" and "whore" all over the place certainly edged close to it.
Yes, because he was saying there IS a difference between dressing sexy and dressing like a whore.
He even said, sexy is fine in moderation.
Maybe you shouldn't have flown off the handle and actually read the posts.
Furthermore, regarding the part about asking for whatever happens after. No woman is to blame for rape, ever. HOWEVER, there are steps you can take to lower risk. It's not my fault if my bike gets stolen, but if I elect to leave it unlocked, I didn't do all I could to avoid a circumstance I wished to avoid.
If a woman dresses super provocative, as she has the right to, she must accept that there are men out there who will find that (Or indeed anything) as an invitation. Some men would rape a woman in a potato sack, but practically and logically speaking, you can lower risk.
The idea that women are ENTIRELY free of blame is as ridiculous as saying they couldn't have helped it.
Originally posted by Peach
And why shouldn't I wear clothes that I like to wear, simply because I'm taken? What kind of controlling, insecure crap is that? Not that me doing so makes him in the least bit uncomfortable, but even so. He doesn't have the right to tell me to change how I dress, and how I have been dressing for years. If someone I was dating did try and tell me to change, he'd be shown the door in an instant.
Like I said, the epigram that begins the single woman's manifesto.
Why are you suggesting it's controlling and insecure? Both myself and others have provided very logical points as to why it may be disliked.
Originally posted by Peach
I've never complained about not being able to 'hide my boobs', btw. Not that such a thing is possible, anyway. Girls have them, they're there, and they'll always be there. And as you say, guys will look anyway. They're going to look, no matter what a girl happens to be wearing. And it sure as hell is not my job to 'dissuade' someone else from practicing an ounce of self-control.
If they're going to look ANYWAY, and your man HAPPENED to find it very unsettling that they did, it would be very respectful for you to do anything you can to dissuade such reactions.
Why am I repeating myself?
Girls can cover them up, I'm not saying to get rid of them. I'm saying low-cut shirts aren't your only option. If you wear them, don't be so foolish as to expect men not to look.
My friend was glancing at a woman's cleavage on the train, and she was CLEARLY exposing it. She actually got mad at him. Sorry, but you don't have the right to get mad if you're exposing it, and that feminist nonsense of: "I feel good." doesn't work. You may feel good, but it is designed to invite the gaze of men, fact.
You might wear a swastika cos you like the design. It doesn't make you a racist, but it's still intended with racist meaning. Same with wearing outfits that flaunt cleavage. It doesn't matter why YOU wear them, because the intention of those actual kinds of outfits is objective, not subjective.
Nobody is saying you can't wear flattering clothing, so please stop arguing against points nobody made. It wastes my time and it waste yours. That's insecurity.
You look at all the models for Victoria's Secret, all the sexualised commercials they have. You think they do that for women and female empowerment?
If you're trying to argue that, then I'm like Winona Ryder; not buying it.
-AC