Originally posted by Batman-PrimeNo, he recanted it. If he meant what he stated then he wouldn't recant the statement. You wanting to still hold this ridiculous statement as something he meant only further shows off your bias.
^from you a complimentEditor's Note: Since publishing of the interview, Dan Jurgens has further expanded on his answer, contradicting the transcript of the interview. ComicBoards has listened to the tape and finds [b]no indication of humor, sarcasm, irony or sardonic whit in Jurgens' statements or Richard Caponetti's questions.
While we can't know what Mr. Jurgens was thinking, or if he silently laughed to himself or in a manner that could not be heard by the tape or by the interviewer, by all apperarences, Jurgens' comments here are genuine. ComicBoards stands by the interviewer in his assesments.read the bold part, he meant what he said. 😉
And to this statement. It pretty much proves this. 😐
You are just pissed because you have been owned by your own double standard. 😉 [/B]
No, it doesn't. I used everything the writer stated while not highlighting something he later recanted. You picked certain statements to highlight while ignoring what he later recanted. That's called picking and choosing while I only use info a writer stands by.
And tbh why would you use Thor beating superman despite him being a million times more powerful as proof of anything when Thor still beats someone despite the power difference. 🙂