Thanos vs Thor/Superman

Started by h1a89 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
Superman gets placed in force block immediately. Game over. he does so while reading a book with his back turned to Superman with shields erected.

If only this was true but sadly it's not.

Not only would Thanos not erect his shields, he couldn't even begin to start a force block attack, nor could he do so with shields erected.

Originally posted by h1a8
If only this was true but sadly it's not.

Not only would Thanos not erect his shields, he couldn't even begin to start a force block attack, nor could he do so with shields erected.

Yes, he can. If you want to prove he can't the onus is on you. He has shown the ability to erect shields and place characters in pure force block. We haven't seen him do it in this order, but that's about as ridiculous as saying he can't cook a hamburger since we haven't seen him do it on panel.

Originally posted by quanchi112
that's about as ridiculous as saying he can't cook a hamburger

I wonder if Thanos can cook well.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, he can. If you want to prove he can't the onus is on you. He has shown the ability to erect shields and place characters in pure force block. We haven't seen him do it in this order, but that's about as ridiculous as saying he can't cook a hamburger since we haven't seen him do it on panel.

No, the onus is on the one to prove the positive. A negative is always true unless the positive is shown or proven.

If you still disagree then assume I asked you to prove that

Superman can't banish others to another dimension with just a thought. Do you understand now?

Quan do you know how to gain more credibility and respect? You must show some form of humility at least every now and then. That means concede sometimes (however rarely).

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
I wonder if Thanos can cook well.
You betcha.
Originally posted by h1a8
No, the onus is on the one to prove the positive. A negative is always true unless the positive is shown or proven.

If you still disagree then assume I asked you to prove that

Superman can't banish others to another dimension with just a thought. Do you understand now?

Quan do you know how to gain more credibility and respect? You must show some form of humility at least every now and then. That means concede sometimes (however rarely).

These abilities have already been proven so the burden is on you to prove otherwise.

You guys are making me hungry.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos won't get a chance to flinch once Superman blitzes (not even 1 micrometer). The fallen one incident is only one incident that doesn't prove that Thanos can react and move to a Superman blitz because fallen one was never proven to even exceed the speed of sound within the first 3 meters. Superman would win this fight alone.

What is the fastest Supes and Thor fought combat wise? Someone not getting the chance to flinch?

Come on now.

Show me some scans of some nanoseconds fighting speed.

Originally posted by carver9
What is the fastest Supes and Thor fought combat wise? Someone not getting the chance to flinch?

Come on now.

Show me some scans of some nanoseconds fighting speed.

You know he doesn't have any.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You betcha. These abilities have already been proven so the burden is on you to prove otherwise.

No they haven't. It wasn't proven that Thanos can attack with shields up.
Speculation and inference isn't proof. Second, it wasn't shown that Fallen One can move fast as Superman within a short distance. Not to mention that 1 feat holds astronomically less weight than say 3 or more.

Why don't you two take it to the battlezone.

homeboy thanos would waste these bitches

Originally posted by Crumpin_boi
homeboy thanos would waste these bitches

That's pretty much what I think too.

Two of the best against Thanos? While each one of them (the current versions) would give Thanos a good fight, both should take a solid majority.

Thor would give Thanos a good fight? The weakest incarnation of Thanos ever shown took him out in two hits.

Originally posted by h1a8
No they haven't. It wasn't proven that Thanos can attack with shields up.
Speculation and inference isn't proof. Second, it wasn't shown that Fallen One can move fast as Superman within a short distance. Not to mention that 1 feat holds astronomically less weight than say 3 or more.
Infinity Abyss. Next question please.

You have no knowledge of the character pretty much the same goes with Superman.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Why don't you two take it to the battlezone.
Why don't you worry about yourself?
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Two of the best against Thanos? While each one of them (the current versions) would give Thanos a good fight, both should take a solid majority.
Based on what? The takes on Odin a guy who can oneshot top tiers so really read about the cracater before you go stating ridiculous thing after ridiculous thing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on what? The takes on Odin a guy who can oneshot top tiers so really read about the cracater before you go stating ridiculous thing after ridiculous thing.

The Odin fight was PIS. This is fact!!!!!!

Second, Fire burns wood
wood blocks water
water puts out fire

proves that abc logic doesn't work.

Superman has a different power set than Odin. He will use his speed to combo Thanos to ko whereas Odin would just blast Thanos to ko.

Originally posted by h1a8
The Odin fight was PIS. This is fact!!!!!!

Second, Fire burns wood
wood blocks water
water puts out fire

proves that abc logic doesn't work.

Superman has a different power set than Odin. He will use his speed to combo Thanos to ko whereas Odin would just blast Thanos to ko.

No, it wasn't.

Thanos has negated speed and Supes can't touch him with his shields up.

Originally posted by h1a8
The Odin fight was PIS. This is fact!!!!!!

Second, Fire burns wood
wood blocks water
water puts out fire

proves that abc logic doesn't work.

Superman has a different power set than Odin. He will use his speed to combo Thanos to ko whereas Odin would just blast Thanos to ko.

You do know that Odin is a guy that creates Solar Systems?

Are you saying that Superman punches>Odins blast.

Prove that the odin fight was pis. Everything is pis when its not involving Superman or (damn, thats pretty much it).

Originally posted by carver9
You do know that Odin is a guy that creates Solar Systems?

Are you saying that Superman punches>Odins blast.

Prove that the odin fight was pis. Everything is pis when its not involving Superman or (damn, thats pretty much it).

Blasts and physical punches are two different things.

Thanos can channel, absorb, and manipulate energy very well.

Second, the Odin fight was PIS.

Proof is the same proof that Spider-man vs. Firelord was PIS.
Odin's has feats that put him far above Thanos it isn't funny.

Originally posted by h1a8
Blasts and physical punches are two different things.

Thanos can channel, absorb, and manipulate energy very well.

Second, the Odin fight was PIS.

Proof is the same proof that Spider-man vs. Firelord was PIS.
Odin's has feats that put him far above Thanos it isn't funny.

Feats don't suddenly make fights pis.