Thanos vs Thor/Superman

Originally posted by h1a8
Blasts and physical punches are two different things.

Thanos can channel, absorb, and manipulate energy very well.

Second, the Odin fight was PIS.

Proof is the same proof that Spider-man vs. Firelord was PIS.
Odin's has feats that put him far above Thanos it isn't funny.

So since thor feats>Superman (defeating galactus, damaging a celestial, taking attacks from an enraged Odin, never being one shotted, damaging mangog, damaging the destroyer), that makes him>>Supes then, huh?

I dont care what Thanos can channel, him taking blast from Odin proves a hell of a lot.

Originally posted by carver9
So since thor feats>Superman (defeating galactus, damaging a celestial, taking attacks from an enraged Odin, never being one shotted, damaging mangog, damaging the destroyer), that makes him>>Supes then, huh?

I dont care what Thanos can channel, him taking blast from Odin proves a hell of a lot.

It proves nothing. This post is super dumb.

Thor defeating a weak Galactus is nothing.

Also abc logic doesn't hold. Only fools use it extensively.

Celestials aren't even harder than adamantium or enchanted uru so damaging them is nothing.

Damaging mangog on the inside is nothing as well.

Damaging the destroyer wasn't normal Thor.

The Odin Thanos fight was PIS. If not then the Spider-man Firelord fight isn't. Lastly, Superman combos Thanos to ko before Thanos can act.

And X>Y doesn't mean X will beat Y in a fight. For > has a different meaning.

Originally posted by h1a8
It proves nothing. This post is super dumb.

Thor defeating a weak Galactus is nothing.

Also abc logic doesn't hold. Only fools use it extensively.

Celestials aren't even harder than adamantium or enchanted uru so damaging them is nothing.

Damaging mangog on the inside is nothing as well.

Damaging the destroyer wasn't normal Thor.

The Odin Thanos fight was PIS. If not then the Spider-man Firelord fight isn't. Lastly, Superman combos Thanos to ko before Thanos can act.

And X>Y doesn't mean X will beat Y in a fight. For > has a different meaning.

😕 What else has damaged the destroyer?

He didnt only damage mangog from the inside, he also bruised that face and knocked his horn off.

Hungry Galactus is still well above sky father.

Celestials isnt harder than adamantium or enchanted uru, LOL? Where did you ge this from? It really doesnt matter. Has Supes ripped through prometheum, which is dc adamantium?

My point is, you cant rely on feats when its kind of obvious that someone is above the other.

Another example. Despero (V&V Despero), Superman feats out weigh his but we seen how that went.

Another example: Titus (I'm pretty sure you dont know who that is). Superman feats out weighs his but he one shotted Supes.

Titus or despero dont have any lifting feats, speed feats, etc.... comparable to Supe but both beat him in one panel.

Originally posted by h1a8
It proves nothing. This post is super dumb.

Thor defeating a weak Galactus is nothing.

Also abc logic doesn't hold. Only fools use it extensively.

Celestials aren't even harder than adamantium or enchanted uru so damaging them is nothing.

Damaging mangog on the inside is nothing as well.

Damaging the destroyer wasn't normal Thor.

The Odin Thanos fight was PIS. If not then the Spider-man Firelord fight isn't. Lastly, Superman combos Thanos to ko before Thanos can act.

And X>Y doesn't mean X will beat Y in a fight. For > has a different meaning.

Originally posted by h1a8
Lies! Saying something doesn't make it true.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Feats don't suddenly make fights pis.

Sure they do. The whole reason there is a SMvFL rule is due to the history of feats between the 2 characters... Thanos' very best showings don't put him near Odin. Period.

Thor/Superman

Originally posted by carver9
So since thor feats>Superman (defeating galactus, damaging a celestial, taking attacks from an enraged Odin, never being one shotted, damaging mangog, damaging the destroyer), that makes him>>Supes then, huh?

I dont care what Thanos can channel, him taking blast from Odin proves a hell of a lot.

Current Thor? You betcha. He is pretty far above Supes currently with the Odin-power. Him taking blasts from Odin proves one thing and one thing only. He has great durability, which was never in question

Thanos and it's not much of a fight really.

Not decided on this fight...what do people think of thor/masterson's encounters with thanos during the Infinity Gaunlet saga (issue 4)? he did pretty good considering it was thanos using the power gem while cutting himself off from the sensory input of the other gems.....very impressive for masterson...any thoughts?

Originally posted by snyper1982
Sure they do. The whole reason there is a SMvFL rule is due to the history of feats between the 2 characters... Thanos' very best showings don't put him near Odin. Period.

Thanos' upper limits weren't tested yet up to this point. It was stated in the comic.

Originally posted by starlock
Not decided on this fight...what do people think of thor/masterson's encounters with thanos during the Infinity Gaunlet saga (issue 4)? he did pretty good considering it was thanos using the power gem while cutting himself off from the sensory input of the other gems.....very impressive for masterson...any thoughts?

Thor really had no chance. Warlock also knew these guys didn't and that everything rested on Norrin Radd.

Originally posted by carver9
😕 What else has damaged the destroyer?

He didnt only damage mangog from the inside, he also bruised that face and knocked his horn off.

Hungry Galactus is still well above sky father.

Celestials isnt harder than adamantium or enchanted uru, LOL? Where did you ge this from? It really doesnt matter. Has Supes ripped through prometheum, which is dc adamantium?

My point is, you cant rely on feats when its kind of obvious that someone is above the other.

Another example. Despero (V&V Despero), Superman feats out weigh his but we seen how that went.

Another example: Titus (I'm pretty sure you dont know who that is). Superman feats out weighs his but he one shotted Supes.

Titus or despero dont have any lifting feats, speed feats, etc.... comparable to Supe but both beat him in one panel.

Originally posted by h1a8
This only proves how weak Mangog is.
Prove it. And if you can then it only shows that it was a low showing for Galactus and thus not valid (because Thor is not skyfather). Otherwise Spider-man vs. Firelord is valid. Superman sent lobo through metal much harder than steel, and that was indirectly and casually. Don't understand what you are trying to say here. No it doesn't. Despero overpowering Superman outweighs any normal Superman feats. Now an unleashed Superman is a different story. Note: Superman mostly holds back unless the sh!t hits the fan.Also Superman has been koed by a gas station. So by your logic a gas station>>>>>planet Earth. The error in your logic is due to not understanding low feats and PIS. If Titus was indeed much stronger than Supes then his feat of one shotting Superman exceeds any feat normal Superman has done and thus he is stronger by feats. Remember hitting feats are just as valid as lifting ones and wrestling ones. Covered already above.

Originally posted by starlock
Not decided on this fight...what do people think of thor/masterson's encounters with thanos during the Infinity Gaunlet saga (issue 4)? he did pretty good considering it was thanos using the power gem while cutting himself off from the sensory input of the other gems.....very impressive for masterson...any thoughts?

It's not canon for Thanos, it was out of character for him to get almost killed.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
It's not canon for Thanos, it was out of character for him to get almost killed.

It's canon and not out of character at all. Infinity Gauntlet is one of the sagas that helped define Thanos as a character. Do not ever dare claim that it was out of character for him.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
😐

It's canon and not out of character at all. Infinity Gauntlet is one of the sagas that helped define Thanos as a character. Do not ever dare claim that it was out of character for him.

IG was canon, yes, but Masterson doing any damage to Thanos is not canon.

!

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
It's not canon for Thanos, it was out of character for him to get almost killed.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
It's not canon for Thanos, it was out of character for him to get almost killed.

WTF? you dont know what canon means?

That series is both genuine or official, it is very much so canon.

Also the plot is about Thanos as the main villain. Its well in character for him and its canon.