Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
what about the help he gives people on debt?
HELP? you mean throwing our nation into further DEBT? I'm not a Repub or Dem...just an AMERICAN...and honestly the actions taken by the this regime...i mean administration, are not to be compared to previous. Completely different circumstances but none the less failures to what they promised...then again when has any lived to the hype?
Originally posted by The Butcher
Well,more than likely he will be re-elected;even though he is a shitty President.
He's a shitty president,just as bad as Bush.were not going to get a good one in there for here on out as long as its a democrat or republican.Neither represent the people.we need a third party president elected.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
He's a shitty president,just as bad as Bush.were not going to get a good one in there for here on out as long as its a democrat or republican.Neither represent the people.we need a third party president elected.
I don't think Obama is a bad president. He could do better on some things, but he's, overall, a satisfactory president.
I'd rate him at a 70%, right now. That's pretty good considering he's a dem. I don't like staunch dems or staunch repubs.
I was very pleased with his efforts to get private involvement into the Haiti thing. That's just wonderful and exactly what I'd do if I were president.
I like his approach, for the most part, to foreign policy. Thought he doesn't do it exactly how I'd like, he's certainly much better at it than Bush. I have mixed opinions about Clinton's foreign policies...but Obama still edges out Clinton, IMO.
I want to see MORE. I want to see more effectiveness and change from Obama. That's what's keeping me from being happy about his presidency.
Originally posted by WickedDynamite
zOMG!!!!!HE'S ONLY BEEN IN OFFICE FOR A SHORT TIME! GIVE HIM TIME!
Nah, he's been in office long enough for people to draw conclusions. His foreign policy is more than satisfactory, America has to be part of the world and repairing the damage done by Bush is important. Still he hasn't done as much in the US as I would have liked, though part of that is because the Republicans try to stonewall various efforts.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Nah, he's been in office long enough for people to draw conclusions. His foreign policy is more than satisfactory, America has to be part of the world and repairing the damage done by Bush is important. Still he hasn't done as much in the US as I would have liked, though part of that is because the Republicans try to stonewall various efforts.
The problem with this of course is that most one year conclusions are wrong in 4 years.
People can always draw conclusions. Its their validitty and accuracy that is in question.
Even if you think that a conclusion at this point is both valid and accurate, pretending like that is the end of the story is just denial.