Sundipped Supes, FUll Gear WW and WM Thor vs AM-armor Prime

Originally posted by Galan007
My post had nothing to do with Thor in the B&T arc (that wasn't Warrior Madness anyway.)

"Originally posted by DarkOdin
Is this True warrior maddness Thor as in 10x strength or blood and thunder???
Thor has stated that Berzerker rage (which is essentially the same thing as WM) increases his strength by tenfold."

i wasn't asking if warrior maddnes increase his strength by 10x just which version

Is this the confusion on this statement?/ Did you think i was aking about warrior maddness???

Originally posted by Starscream M
any reason not to?

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Yes you have to confirm it though a feat of narration which you can't unless you got a scan that states sundipped increase is powers by 100. Whcih you don't it is clear that he is high ampped but 100's is just a fanboys dream

Originally posted by Starscream M
any reason not to?

Besides the fact that's there's no proof that he explicitly was x100, I don't think the feats he had under his belt show that he was that much stronger than his normal state, especially considering how strong he is when the gloves come off anyway by default with no amps. I can buy somewhere around x10 and perhaps even beyond that to a point but x100?

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Is this the confusion on this statement?/ Did you think i was aking about warrior maddness???

Originally posted by Galan007
👆

so far, the ppl who are lowballing supes have offered no evidence for why they think sundipped superman isn't 100x stronger.

Originally posted by Starscream M
so far, the ppl who are lowballing supes have offered no evidence for why they think sundipped superman isn't 100x stronger.

Who's lowballing Superman? So far I've seen 3 people (not counting myself) claim that he's not x100 stronger or express doubt over it. No one's lowballed Superman in this thread, as I think most people agree that the team wins, anyway. You're the one who originally made the claim that he's x100 stronger. Why should anyone else who disagrees with this have to prove you wrong when you're the person that originally claimed this?

Originally posted by Starscream M
so far, the ppl who are lowballing supes have offered no evidence for why they think sundipped superman isn't 100x stronger.

For example Thor in warrior maddness is 1000x faster and stronger then Superman sundipped.

Prove me wrong

This is not how it is done but yet your are trying to do it these way and it makes you look like a fanboy.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Who's lowballing Superman? So far I've seen 3 people (not counting myself) claim that he's not x100 stronger or express doubt over it. No one's lowballed Superman in this thread, as I think most people agree that the team wins, anyway. You're the one who originally made the claim that he's x100 stronger. Why should anyone else who disagrees with this have to prove you wrong when you're the person that originally claimed this?

that is not a logical position to take.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Who's lowballing Superman? So far I've seen 3 people (not counting myself) claim that he's not x100 stronger or express doubt over it. No one's lowballed Superman in this thread, as I think most people agree that the team wins, anyway. You're the one who originally made the claim that he's x100 stronger. Why should anyone else who disagrees with this have to prove you wrong when you're the person that originally claimed this?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't think anyone reasonable would.

Originally posted by DarkOdin
In a fourm debate we don't have to prove he isn't the burden is on you to prove he is based on feats which you have yet to do.

For example Thor in warrior maddness is 1000x faster and stronger then Superman sundipped.

Prove me wrong

This is not how it is done but yet your are trying to do it these way and it makes you look like a fanboy.

also, I am not even a big fan of superman, let alone a fanboy.

you may not like how strong he is after sundipping...but that doesn't make you right.

Originally posted by Starscream M
I have offered evidence for my point. You guys have not offered any evidence for your point. All you guys are saying is "I don't believe he got amped 100x simply because I don't believe it".

that is not a logical position to take.

What evidence? That he beat Imperiex?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
What evidence? That he beat Imperiex?

also the narration indicated he got upgraded to a new tier...most likely skyfather.

Originally posted by Starscream M
I have offered evidence for my point. You guys have not offered any evidence for your point. All you guys are saying is "I don't believe he got amped 100x simply because I don't believe it".

that is not a logical position to take.

Originally posted by Starscream M
yep.

also the narration indicated he got upgraded to a new tier...most likely skyfather.

So new tier = x100 stronger?

That doesn't really offer anything close to evidence on your part as far as him being as strong as you claim he was. If anything, that's an estimation of your part and a pretty big one at that. What did he actually do that gives you the impression his strength was multiplied to such a great degree?

Originally posted by Starscream M
yep.

also the narration indicated he got upgraded to a new tier...most likely skyfather.

Odin is the high standard of skyfathers and to say he is 100x stronger the Sueprman or Thor is crazy.

Originally posted by Starscream M
so far, the ppl who are lowballing supes have offered no evidence for why they think sundipped superman isn't 100x stronger.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Not with the OWAW Sundip. Now if he were to sit in the sun for a week...

Originally posted by DarkOdin
What skyfather is 100xs stronger then Superman.

Odin is the high standard of skyfathers and to say he is 100x stronger the Sueprman or Thor is crazy.

Im going to have to reassess

still think sundip superman is vastly more powerful than 10x thor though...which was my original point