Ganondorf Vs Azeroth

Started by ScreamPaste15 pages

Kain doesnt need to know its past when he can see the souls of his victims being taken on strike, thats all thats important here.

Prove it.

Ganon's studied and and wields it first hand.

Kain has seen the reaver taking souls? Are you sure people just don't die after being stabbed?

yes because I often take pictures or vids of me punching chalk to prove it on forums.
A picture of your hand in a cast will do.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Ganon's studied and and wields it first hand.

Kain has seen the reaver taking souls? Are you sure people just don't die after being stabbed?
.

He just uses its power which is ambigious.

Kains seen that before, also the reaver is a legend that Kain knows well. kain has experiance with souls as technically he is one and has first hand experiance of being one, and furthermore he can rip them free with magic, needless to say he knows all of its uses.

If you ever decide to play a Zelda game, I know you will give us the most heartfelt apology that the world has ever heard.

Kains seen that before, also the reaver is a legend that Kain knows well. kain has experiance with souls as technically he is one and has first hand experiance of being one, and furthermore he can rip them free with magic, needless to say he knows all of its uses.
Legends are fallible.
Kain is fallible. It's all fallible.

He just uses its power which is ambigious.
He's the most knowledgeable person on the triforce in LoZ.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Legends are fallible.
Kain is fallible. It's all fallible.

He's the most knowledgeable person on the triforce in LoZ.

First hand use>ambigious use of power.

Does not say much.

Ganon uses it first hand.... haermm

You seriously are claiming Ganon's use isn't first hand?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Ganon uses it first hand.... haermm

You seriously are claiming Ganon's use isn't first hand?

Ganons got more to know about the triforce of power than a couple of uses assuming he even chooses when he uses it, or whether its just passively strengthening him.

Also your not exactly using a quote from Ganon to support his knowledge yet.

Originally posted by Burning thought

Also your not exactly using a quote from Ganon to support his knowledge yet.

Play a game. They are full of quotes. 😐

Ganons got more to know about the triforce of power than a couple of uses assuming he even chooses when he uses it, or whether its just passively strengthening him.
I'm not even sure of what you're saying here, so I'll just say this.

Ganon's knowledge of the triforce > Kain's knowledge of the reaver. If Ganon's is fallible, so is Kain's.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'm not even sure of what you're saying here, so I'll just say this.

Ganon's knowledge of the triforce > Kain's knowledge of the reaver. If Ganon's is fallible, so is Kain's.

Nah, Kains knowledge of this particulour use of what he claims is a first hand use of what can actually see when he makes an action. how, why or when the triforce works is unkown to Ganon.

The triforce is ambigious and hes not actually claimed anything thats probably not obvious from shown quotes.

how, why or when the triforce works is unkown to Ganon.
Play a Zelda game.
I dare you to try and prove this. 😐

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Play a Zelda game.
I [b]dare
you to try and prove this. 😐 [/B]

You need to prove it.

And why would I prove anything to you? you dont show any evidence, in this thread Ganon is featless.

You need to prove it.
You made the assertion, you need to prove it. And you can't.

And why would I prove anything to you? you dont show any evidence, in this thread Ganon is featless.
I win again. I accept your concession.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You made the assertion, you need to prove it. And you can't.

I win again. I accept your concession.

Thats like saying "nobody can prove God does not exist, therefore he does" = "nobody can prove Ganon does not know about the triforce therefore he does"

You copout like that when ever you cannot provide evidence which is in every thread. I will wait for a debator. I grow bored of your trolling which GK has adviced us both to stop doing, including you.

Thats like saying "nobody can prove God does not exist, therefore he does" = "nobody can prove Ganon does not know about the triforce therefore he does"
But I can prove Ganondorf does know about the triforce.

You copout like that when ever you cannot provide evidence which is in every thread. I will wait for a debator. I grow bored of your trolling which GK has adviced us both to stop doing, including you.
Cause all those screenshots, quotes, and bits of common sense aren't evidence? I posted tons. You post none, and just try to deconstruct whatever people do post. The irony of you claiming I'm not a proper debater is that you're the forum's inside joke, sir.

GK told us we'd get warnings, and if that means both of us, so be it. It takes two to tango, sir, and you're dancing with me. Either sit down, or accept your fate. 131

This forum will be a better place without our constant war, anyway. Maybe then people can enjoy a thread.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
But I can prove Ganondorf does know about the triforce.

Cause all those screenshots, quotes, and bits of common sense aren't evidence? I posted tons. You post none, and just try to deconstruct whatever people do post. The irony of you claiming I'm not a proper debater is that you're the forum's inside joke, sir.

GK told us we'd get warnings, and if that means both of us, so be it. It takes two to tango, sir, and you're dancing with me. Either sit down, or accept your fate. 131

This forum will be a better place without our constant war, anyway. Maybe then people can enjoy a thread.

Go on then.

Theres no evidence of any sort from you apart from one screen in the other thread.

And reported.

Theres no evidence of any sort from you apart from one screen in the other thread.
So now you acknowledge it exists, now to make you remember the other images I've posted.

Alright, report me. Let's burn in the fires of the ban together.

Sticks of chalk = Gypsum, just wanted to point it out in this train crash.

Sticks of chalk = Gypsum, just wanted to point it out in this train crash.

This is why I asked BT for a picture of his hand in a cast. 😉

Originally posted by BloodRain
Sticks of chalk = Gypsum, just wanted to point it out in this train crash.

What do you mean?