Originally posted by Burning thought
He wouldnt be capable, the Paladin is far stronger, look at him. Unless Link has GG. Tbh tho, Paladin would probably just cast Repentance, then walk up to a vulnerable link and pull his head off, tear his hat in half and stamp on it.
I wasn't aware random Paladins were capable of chucking 1000 ton rocks.
Gentlemen, the argument I bring to your attention does not go unwarranted. Measurements on the strength and ability of video games depends entirely on an individual's perception of what they think of in-game actions which demonstrate a character's insane strength. The only real person that could answer this question is the creator of each game. Only they themselves can imagine their character in the real world and project who would win.
Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Link has better feats of strength then any random Paladin
Not sure about that, give the Paladin the ability to ignore physics and he too could probably do similiar things, but I assume this match is in a physics based environment so without items, Links a kid swinging a sword at a hardened veteran.
But this is a pointless argument, mainly because repentance stops link in his tracks, his strength would mean nothing.
Originally posted by Q'Anilia
Quite false
not really, shes correct. The creator knows things about characters the public would not, not to mension how they would react against another. Listing feats is pointless compared to the knowledge of the creator who knows the max limit of all their characters physical or otherwise.
Edit: also not all game universes or characters work alongside logic, physics or common sense.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Not sure about that, give the Paladin the ability to ignore physics and he too could probably do similiar things, but I assume this match is in a physics based environment so without items, Links a kid swinging a sword at a hardened veteran.But this is a pointless argument, mainly because repentance stops link in his tracks, his strength would mean nothing.
Dun't give a fvck. No Paladin has shown feats of strength like throwing around giant rocks.
"probably"? You're assuming. I lol'd.
Scans and info of the spell please.
Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Dun't give a fvck. No Paladin has shown feats of strength like throwing around giant rocks."probably"? You're assuming. I lol'd.
Scans and info of the spell please.
I think trying to trick the censor is a bannable offence. neither has a normal link, and Marios shown feats of strength but in a logical/physical world I dont think hed be able to escape galaxies or lift castles.
Probabiltiy comes into everything. Anyone with any intellect would know that a straight fight does not deal in absolutes in most cases.
http://eu.wowarmory.com/talent-calc.xml?c=Paladin
http://www.wowwiki.com/Repentance
Puts the enemy target in a state of meditation, incapacitating them for up to 1 min
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I'm starting to hate those two pics.
Did the moment they came 😛
Originally posted by Trowl
Explain ^^;
There is a difference between the intentions behind a character, and the character that has made appearance in the game. The creator knows what he wants, but if what he wants is not shown in the game, or if there is more to the character than the game shows, then it fall outside the game category and it becomes simply a fictional character. An expanded variety of the game character.
What we see is what you get. If you want more than that, you get something other than the character you play. What a creator knows about a character is irrelevant if it deviate from what the character has done in a game. If the creator had an expanded variety in mind, they end up two different characters with the same name and nature.