Link Versus Paladin (Warcraft)

Started by LLLLLink7 pages

I'm playing through TP right now, and Shin, you were right about the Spin Attack being instantanious. At the moment of input, anyone within range takes a hit, regardless of whether they are behind you, in front or wherever. Also, the "shockwave" from the move extends the attack's duration so that even though Link has finished the attack, an enemy will still be struck if it enters his attack's field of influence. This means that the Spin Attack has virtually no startup or cooldown. One more thing; the shockwave from the attack reaches above and below the sword's path of travel a great deal. A trait like that would nullify aerial strikes as well as attacks from below.
To whoever it was that said that the Spin Attack was weak and useless; I'm calling you an idiot. 👆

Originally posted by NemeBro
1. Probably because he needed an item to be able to lift that much. 🙂 But you wouldn't know, you don't play the games.

2. Your logic is a poor mockery of real logic.

3. ...Wait, so, obviously, he must be stronger because... He's big? But BT... You said to me that I was assuming based on the size of the Moblins Link fights that they were strong. Like you just did with the Pally. Real fail hypocrisy here mate, and by the way, Moblins dwarf that Paladin, and Darknuts dwarf it even further. Both of whom Link routinely kills in martial combat. You are either trolling, or an illogical hypocrite.

4. He would be as big as Link's toe. 😐

1. Gauntlets, yeh i do know.

2. No i use real logic, not fanon. I understand your confusion.

3. The pally has not been physically beaten by a child afaik. lol apprently trolling is saying anything you dont like about your fiction, yet when I attempted to claim against the illogical nonsense for pyron or Demitri you used to say "zomg itz fiction!". Your the hypocrite "mate".

4. Show this.

Originally posted by Burning thought
3. The pally has not been physically beaten by a child afaik

As Korialstrasz has been beat by a child, I am sure a random Paladin can be.

How did this child beat him? physically overpowered him? does this child have no background of innate physical superiority?

Or is it Deathwing or some other magically powerful being in another form?

Dargonax. He was by all definitions a child.

hes a twilight dragon, how can you call him a child? just because he takes the form of one or something?

Because he was newly born when they fought him. How do you define a child?

a biological human child. If your talking about a dragon whelp then your kinda missing the whole point.

You said child, not biological human child. Not that Link is human, so I thought you just meant child by definition and not according to your perspective. Link is older than Dargonax, by the way.

Originally posted by Q'Anilia
You said child, not biological human child. Not that Link is human, so I thought you just meant child by definition and not according to your perspective. Link is older than Dargonax, by the way.

No, when I say "child" I am simply talking about a biological human child or something close, Link is that even if he is not technically human.

Dargonax is a child too. No, barely even a child. He's a baby, nigh infant, and he almost conquered the entire world. He with no effort beat one of the more powerful men on the planet, and he is a child.

Child, child, child, child. The cutie is just a baby.

Hes also a twilight dragon with a vast amount of innate power. Also didnt he steal powers or something? he had some strange but powerful ability.

He absorb magic and converted it to his own, and grew in size as he did this. He is still a child, though, which is my point. You keep using the argument that Link is just a child and that just a child can not beat a Paladin.

My argument is that just an infant almost conquered Azeroth.

No but your twisting my logic, your using an example of a dragon with innate magical power and abilities. Link has no canon mention of innate magical powers or abilities, he uses items througohut his games to achieve most of what he does and even some of that is not believable based on the games own canon therefore not physically viable.

The non gameplay/PIS Link without items is biologically a child in a lot of his games. Even as an adult hes not physically impressive, his body has less muscle than that Draeani paladins finger.

But not a biologically human infant?

Link has no canon mention of innate magical powers or abilities,
FAAAAALLLLSEEEE.

Even if this were true, and it isn't, the fact Link consistantly displays power makes your point moot.

and even some of that is not believable based on the games own canon therefore not physically viable.
You've never even played a Zelda game, I keep telling you this, but you don't get to decide what's canon. You keep pulling this out of your ass and saying it, but it doesn't make any sense.

The non gameplay/PIS Link without items is biologically a child in a lot of his games. Even as an adult hes not physically impressive, his body has less muscle than that Draeani paladins finger.
facepalmx
1.If you take out gameplay, Raziel and Kain both lose their only strength feats. GJ.
2. Link still has strength feats. GJ.
3. These thrength feats put Link in the class 100 range, unenhanced, pretty consistantly. GJ.
4. With enhancements, and more recently without enhancements, Link hits the metahuman strength range, in canon.

The paladin's pretty strong, but he can't compete with someone who's blatantly superhuman. That's not a fair comparison.

This shouldn't get past five pages...

Not that Link is human, so I thought you just meant child by definition and not according to your perspective.

I just wanted to point out that Link is human. He is called a human, like, a bazillion times in TP.

Nah 5L, human is a relative term, they call themselves human the same way we do, because they're also speaking English. They're explicitly Hylians, though. Human is a broad term to describe any of the humanoid races, such as Twili, Zora, Goron, or Hylian =P

Originally posted by LLLLLink
[B] Not that Link is human, so I thought you just meant child by definition and not according to your perspective.

I just wanted to point out that Link is human. He is called a human, like, a bazillion times in TP. [/B]

I thought Link was Hylian.

He is 😛 Human is used.. Well because "Hylian" sounds odd in certain contexts.