Originally posted by Robtard
Just scene or SM2?I'd disagree on either count, for reasons stated. Just curios though.
Scene.
Pointless, needless. Consider the amount of celebrity magazines that exist, the man works for a major tabloid, and a lot of people have seen his face.
Even aside from that, it was a ham-fisted piece and really didn't need to be there.
As for the movie, I always preferred the first, but anyway, sorry for the off topic comments.
I didn't see Imped's post until I'd already posted.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Scene.Pointless, needless. Consider the amount of celebrity magazines that exist, the man works for a major tabloid, and a lot of people have seen his face.
Even aside from that, it was a ham-fisted piece and really didn't need to be there.
As for the movie, I always preferred the first, but anyway, sorry for the off topic comments.
I didn't see Imped's post until I'd already posted.
-AC
About what part of which of my previous post are you referring?
Hows this from this guy thats from Australia
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/entertainment/1037038/richard-wilkins-slams-controversial-film-kick-ass
Well getting negative idiotic reviews (written by complete dolts) makes me want to see this more. I'm not expecting anything great from this movie, I'm expecting this movie to be:
a) Violent
b) Relatively funny ( the movie will most likely be silly as f*ck)
c) Entertaining
I have faith that it will statisfy these requirments, anybody looking for anything other than these qualities should just not bother to watch it.