Originally posted by Wild Shadowpeter parker is a wisecracking, low confidence, clown
yeah.. okay whatever you say there body....
🙄care to explain your logic building to us?
anyways to answer the luke cage wanking, yes...
blue_bandana
logan is a moody, antisocial, loner
neither would be good for a team like new avengers.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTWyup, thats why i posted it. remeber guys he is only vulnerable outside not inside even though we have bn getting some rather inconsistent powerset from cage lately.
Danny made Cage bleed with a non-amped punch in that issue, too biscuits
mental note inner skin tissue like the inside of the mouth is not invulnerable and luke can still feel pain regardless of durability. 😎 😄
i can make a defense even when we have a spite thread.
Originally posted by Starscream M
peter parker is a wisecracking, low confidence, clownlogan is a moody, antisocial, loner
neither would be good for a team like new avengers.
care to explain the pros and cons of luke that you think would put him above either characters you just mention? 🙄
Originally posted by Wild Shadow
care to explain the pros and cons of luke that you thing would put him above either characters you just mention? 🙄
luke cage has confidence - parker doesn't - logan does
luke cage is social - parker isn't (he's not even comfortable telling everyone his identity) - logan isn't (he goes on his own at times without telling anyone where he is)
luke cage is trusted - this both peter and logan do as well
luke cage has experience leading - peter doesn't have much - logan has some
Originally posted by Starscream M
luke cage has confidence - parker doesn't - logan doesluke cage is social - parker isn't (he's not even comfortable telling everyone his identity) - logan isn't (he goes on his own at times without telling anyone where he is)
luke cage is trusted - this both peter and logan do as well
luke cage has experience leading - peter doesn't have much - logan has some
Becuase one does not give up there indentity that makes them not social? You know how stupid that sounds? Spiderman is easily one of the most social, hell he to social at times.....if anything....... Wolverine dispite his gruffness is closest more so to many of the x-men then anyone elses on the team. Being social has nothing to do with being a great leader........
Peter easily has as much as Cage..........Logan has well over 10 times the experience then cage.............
Originally posted by Battlehammeryeah scott have xavier's backup to help him get his authority
Scot was no confident for years and was still consider one of the greatest leaders in marvel.........Becuase one does not give up there indentity that makes them not social? You know how stupid that sounds? Spiderman is easily one of the most social, hell he to social at times.....if anything....... Wolverine dispite his gruffness is closest more so to many of the x-men then anyone elses on the team. Being social has nothing to do with being a great leader........
Peter easily has as much as Cage..........Logan has well over 10 times the experience then cage.............
yes...not telling your fellow teammates who you are does make you antisocial. wolverine may be close, but that doesn't mean he is as social as cage.
lol ok
how many friends does Cage have how many teams has he led?...
Leadership is based on time and experience and yes authority not socialibility . something cyke had over all his other xmen... he was Xavier's prized student for a reason a person can be a leader and not have much confindence outside his role
Originally posted by Starscream M
yeah scott have xavier's backup to help him get his authority
ok
Originally posted by Starscream M
yes...not telling your fellow teammates who you are does make you antisocial. wolverine may be close, but that doesn't mean he is as social as cage.lol ok
So I dont understand were you keep thinking that social = good leadership, becuase thats not true in the least.
and whats with the lol? thats not funny it a simply what is.
Originally posted by Battlehammer
Not at all. Much of the time Prof X wa snot even there on missions or even in the same country.There many idfferent ways to be social, and again it has litterally nothing to do with being a leader.........how do you think the military works? For starters back in the 40's officers "leaders" were not even suposes to sit at the same table as there men..........
So I dont understand were you keep thinking that social = good leadership, becuase thats not true in the least.
and whats with the lol? thats not funny it a simply what is.
1. doesn't matter that prof x wasn't on the mission. all the other xmen knew prof x designated scott leader...so he was given authority. later on, he obviously earned their respect and trust.
2. military is not avengers. what works in the military doesn't work in the avengers. poor analogy.
3. i don't think logan has 10x more leadership experience than cage.
Originally posted by Wild Shadowjeez...against, leadership is different in military vs a voluntary group of heroes.
it's obvious he has never served in the service or he would have heard the term fraternization, which makes his social argument irrelevant for leadership of a team and he would know it has nothing to do with one another.