Originally posted by Ultraviolence
Unfortunately, some people think that quality is debatable. Ironically, it's always fun debating someone who thinks that it is.
"Batman Begins" was an origin story to re-establish the character.
"The Dark Knight" was an escalation of Batman's world, introducing elements and characters that increase our knowledge and understanding of not only Batman, but Gotham City in general.
Originally posted by Ultraviolence
Unfortunately, some people think that quality is debatable. Ironically, it's always fun debating someone who thinks that it is.
Quality is debatable. EG a BMW 525 is of better quality [build] than say any Lancia ever made. The film Crazy Heart is of better quality [script] than the film GI Joe.
Originally posted by Ultraviolence
Unfortunately, some people think that quality is debatable. Ironically, it's always fun debating someone who thinks that it is.
Of course quality is debatable, considering "Quality" is determined differently by each person.
If someone likes Date Movie, you can't tell them they're wrong.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Of course quality is debatable, considering "Quality" is determined differently by each person.If someone likes Date Movie, you can't tell them they're wrong.
-AC
True, though things like quality are a construct that can be relatively standardized. You can say there is no such thing as a good or bad doctor, but standards can be set saying that one doctor is generally considered "good" and another "bad." Though, an individuals subjective opinion can differ from the standard version of "good." I think the same can be said for movies.
Originally posted by Myth
True, though things like quality are a construct that can be relatively standardized. You can say there is no such thing as a good or bad doctor, but standards can be set saying that one doctor is generally considered "good" and another "bad." Though, an individuals subjective opinion can differ from the standard version of "good." I think the same can be said for movies.
That's not subjective, though.
If a doctor kills all his patients due to ineptitude, he is an objectively bad doctor. It doesn't matter what your personal opinion of him is, because ability is not subjective. Neither is a lack thereof.
You can't have the opinion that Neil Peart of Rush is a shit drummer, technically, because he factually is not. You can think the music he makes is shit, because that's up to you.
This isn't about that. It's about whether or not you enjoyed a movie, and thus consider it good quality. That's always subjective.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Of course quality is debatable, considering "Quality" is determined differently by each person.If someone likes Date Movie, you can't tell them they're wrong.
-AC
I keep on forgetting it can be difficult to detect sarcasm on here. I wasn't being literal. I was mocking Robtard.