Originally posted by quanchi112
So this is another example of you ignoring how these two are portrayed in the comics? Further debate with you is pointless as you can't even acknowledge their showings.
Who cares how they are portrayed? This is a forum fight not a comic fight, big difference. In a comic Thor would win a very slight majority over SS. But in reality he would lose almost every time.
Originally posted by h1a8Then you aren't debating how these characters matchup just how you view their powersets which isn't how we debate here. All this time and you still don't get it.
Who cares how they are portrayed? This is a forum fight not a comic fight, big difference. In a comic Thor would win a very slight majority over SS. But in reality he would lose almost every time.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Then you aren't debating how these characters matchup just how you view their powersets which isn't how we debate here. All this time and you still don't get it.
I take their skill and willingness to perform a certain tactic into consideration too. What I don't do is allow contradictions. Which is something that must be done if one is only considering how characters match up in the comic. Since u do this then u are allowing for contradictions to exist. Contradictions can't exist anywhere, for it is logically impossible.
You my friend don't know the true spirit of comic debating.
It began with power set arguing. Since I can remember everyone was arguing/debating comic fights. Their arguments would center only on power sets. This was the case since the beginning. This is the spirit.
Now I understand CIS. But CIS only applies to a character willingness to perform an action or that the character isn't smart enough to perform a certain action.
If Superman knows he has super speed and he knows that if he doesn't use it then he will lose. Then what do u think Superman will do? He will use his speed of course. I don't care how many times he didn't in the comic. He has proven time and time again that he is smart enough to come to that conclusion, which is all that matters. As far as willingness, all it takes is at least a couple of showings to prove that a character is willing to perform an action under a certain condition.
But no worries the OP has the CIS off option.
Originally posted by h1a8What you can't seem to grasp is what the writers give us is what we debate for or against. You ignore what you don't like and make up the rest.
I take their skill and willingness to perform a certain tactic into consideration too. What I don't do is allow contradictions. Which is something that must be done if one is only considering how characters match up in the comic. Since u do this then u are allowing for contradictions to exist. Contradictions can't exist anywhere, for it is logically impossible.You my friend don't know the true spirit of comic debating.
It began with power set arguing. Since I can remember everyone was arguing/debating comic fights. Their arguments would center only on power sets. This was the case since the beginning. This is the spirit.Now I understand CIS. But CIS only applies to a character willingness to perform an action or that the character isn't smart enough to perform a certain action.
If Superman knows he has super speed and he knows that if he doesn't use it then he will lose. Then what do u think Superman will do? He will use his speed of course. I don't care how many times he didn't in the comic. He has proven time and time again that he is smart enough to come to that conclusion, which is all that matters. As far as willingness, all it takes is at least a couple of showings to prove that a character is willing to perform an action under a certain condition.
But no worries the OP has the CIS off option.
Originally posted by quanchi112
What you can't seem to grasp is what the writers give us is what we debate for or against. You ignore what you don't like and make up the rest.
Making something up means creating something that didn't happen. When have I done this? I reason off of what did happen.
Well if comic fights were the judge then why have a forum discussion?
Hell, many threads have characters who already fought against each other in the comic.
Why not just use the outcome of those fights as the judge. Why open up a thread when the fight already happened?
U don't understand the point of all this do u?