Sex and Age

Started by inimalist5 pages
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
The natural right to have sex with small children.

probably best to stick with negative rights

Originally posted by inimalist
probably best to stick with negative rights

The right to not be coerced into not having sex with small children, then.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
The right to not be coerced into not having sex with small children, then.

the childs right to not forcibly have sex or to not be put in a situation where an adult is coercing them into something they don't understand would supercede that

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
before 10 years old its unacceptable, i dont care what anyone says

Thanks for stating the obvious... so if you had a kid who was 11 who had sex, you would be a-ok?

You've done nothing but play the devil's advocate in this thread King Kandy, how about actually voicing your own opinion.

I don't have a solid opinion. That's one of the reasons I made this thread.

Why ask for people's opinions then? If all you're going to do it question them. People can think what they want when it comes to the correct age of sex but it all amounts to nothing. Laws are already in place and I'm personally satisfied with the age of 16 here. Seems perfectly reasonable.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Why ask for people's opinions then? If all you're going to do it question them. People can think what they want when it comes to the correct age of sex but it all amounts to nothing. Laws are already in place and I'm personally satisfied with the age of 16 here. Seems perfectly reasonable.
Yeah, as reasonable as randomly picked ages can be, really.

I'm trying to see if anyone can logically justify their attitudes to the issue.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, as reasonable as randomly picked ages can be, really.
It's not that random really. Most people have finished puberty, you're old enough to leave school and move out. Seems like a relativly sensible place to put the age limit.

Originally posted by King Kandy
I'm trying to see if anyone can logically justify their attitudes to the issue.

but its an issue that age really isn't the most prevalent in. Sure, there are situations that are obviously explotitative (in terms of age of consent), but in those cases it is because the child is so young that it is impossible they would have the sexual maturity to be in a serious relationship with someone of an older age.

But, I'm not going to say there aren't cases of 16 year olds who are sexually mature enough to handle themselves with older people, in the same way that there are people over 30 who never become sexually mature.

The logic would be that people become mature enough around 14-16 to be engaging in sexual relations with their peers, and largely it is social hegemony on the issue that stops sort of widespread exploitation. lol, imho anyways.

What's the best thing about twenty eight year olds?

There's twenty of them.

Thank you, Thank you...Here all week.

Twenty one year olds works better. 21 is a more desirable age and 1 is more disgusting.

Sex is acceptable above the age of 16-17. 15 and you're REALLY pushing it. Anything under that and it's just unacceptable, imo.

I also believe on a moral standpoint that sex should ONLY be with someone you really care about, and plan on being with for AT LEAST a year or two. I know it's almost unrealistic at this point to expect people to actually do that, but I honestly believe you shouldn't have sex unless you actually love the person you're doing it with. Otherwise, what's the point?

...extreme, mind blowing pleasure?

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
...extreme, mind blowing pleasure?

With someone you don't give a damn about?

yeah, whats wrong with that?

youre thinking about it with the idea in mind that sex is inherently sacred; to some people its not, especially for people who dont want kids. its just another way to stimulate your senses and have a lot of fun, like riding a ride (pun?) at an amusement park. do you ride rides or watch movies or engage in other pelasurable activities only with someone that youre deeply in love with?

besides, all animals on earth screw and in a lot of cases for non human animals, they screw and when the parenting cycle is over they move on, and when the mating season starts again they find entirely different mates from the ones they had before. sex, at its most primal stage, is nothing more than a means to reproduce and further the survival of the species. trying to make it anything more than that is just the result of a tendency humans have to try to find meaning in a universe that doesnt have one. though if youre religious youll probably disagree...

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
yeah, whats wrong with that?

youre thinking about it with the idea in mind that sex is inherently sacred; to some people its not, especially for people who dont want kids. its just another way to stimulate your senses and have a lot of fun, like riding a ride (pun?) at an amusement park. do you ride rides or watch movies or engage in other pelasurable activities only with someone that youre deeply in love with?

Well, I guess I'm just different.

Sex is really intimate knowledge of someone else. IDK, to me, sex is more than just a pleasurable activity, it's a statement of love, as well. That's why they call it "making love", no?

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Well, I guess I'm just different.

Sex is really intimate knowledge of someone else. IDK, to me, sex is more than just a pleasurable activity, it's a statement of love, as well. That's why they call it "making love", no?

Some people call it that, some people just call it "a ****."

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
yeah, whats wrong with that?

youre thinking about it with the idea in mind that sex is inherently sacred; to some people its not, especially for people who dont want kids. its just another way to stimulate your senses and have a lot of fun, like riding a ride (pun?) at an amusement park. do you ride rides or watch movies or engage in other pelasurable activities only with someone that youre deeply in love with?

besides, all animals on earth screw and in a lot of cases for non human animals, they screw and when the parenting cycle is over they move on, and when the mating season starts again they find entirely different mates from the ones they had before. sex, at its most primal stage, is nothing more than a means to reproduce and further the survival of the species. trying to make it anything more than that is just the result of a tendency humans have to try to find meaning in a universe that doesnt have one. though if youre religious youll probably disagree...

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
...extreme, mind blowing pleasure?
Originally posted by Bat Dude
With someone you don't give a damn about?
Got to agree with Bat Dude to a degree. Sex with someone you're intimate with is 100x better than a fling. I don't know about anyone else but I've never had "mind blowing pleasure" from a one night stand. Sure it's pleasurable but it's shit compared to the real deal.

You talk about other animals only sticking around for the mating season, which is true... But they're also other animals. Humans are one of those species that usually sticks to monogamy.