Originally posted by §P0oONY
[B]But we are now regardless of anything else.
depends on who you ask. nothing points to humans being inherently monogamous.
If you've ever had sex with someone you love you'll know that it's a totally different experience.
again, that depends entirely on who you ask. for a lot of people sex becomes less frequent the longer theyre in a relationship (i.e. marriage), so it would be the opposite of what youre saying.
Originally posted by Bat Dude
Sex is acceptable above the age of 16-17. 15 and you're REALLY pushing it. Anything under that and it's just unacceptable, imo.I also believe on a moral standpoint that sex should ONLY be with someone you really care about, and plan on being with for AT LEAST a year or two. I know it's almost unrealistic at this point to expect people to actually do that, but I honestly believe you shouldn't have sex unless you actually love the person you're doing it with. Otherwise, what's the point?
Also, why is "16" the landmark age, but one year earlier and "OH NO THAT'S TOO EARLY!" That seems incredibly arbitrary to me.
Originally posted by King KandySo because loads of people disagree with him he's naive and shouldn't have the stand point? Since when are these things so cut and dry. His opinions are as valid as anyones. Don't get on your high horse because you don't agree, your stand point is not superior.
What's the point? That really seems like a very naive response. Obviously there are tons of people who don't agree with you on that issue, but you somehow think you can condemn them for that because they don't live up to your idealized idea of sex.Also, why is "16" the landmark age, but one year earlier and "OH NO THAT'S TOO EARLY!" That seems incredibly arbitrary to me.
Sex is sex, treat it as you want. Don't start a thread asking for someone's opinion and then have the audacity to call them naive for sharing it.