The Elemental Forest God gauntlet....

T-Rex's were biting him full force, and he didn't get any broken bones.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
So in your opinion, Kong limbs/neck are harder to crush than a car, frame included?

EFG wraps a limb around Kong's throat, holds him aloft, and chokes Kong out. EFG has many limbs, Kong will have to work his way through them to get to EFG. Kong isn't exactly a strategist, he's dumb as a stump. He's gonna rush in headlong and get a limb wrapped around his throat, and EFG will simply squeeze until Kong is out.

Gigantic gorilla neck > car, and he wouldn't just sit there, like the car did.

Gorilla's routinely break apart trees to get at the tasty center and they have a stronger bite than a grizzly bear, as they eat very tough shrubbery. So those tree limbs would be torn to pieces, bitten in twain and it'd it pummel-pounded into mush, just how gorilla's fight.

Originally posted by Robtard
Ha, you're ignored, homo.

I'm not entirely. I'm on ignore, but he's not ignoring me.

Also, does anybody yet have a reasonably argument as to how a stationary tree, that only did well against helicopters, is going to beat Kong or Godzilla?

This is why the debates don't work. He decides an outcome and doesn't budge.

-AC

Originally posted by Robtard
Gigantic gorilla neck > car, and he wouldn't just sit there, like the car did.

Gorilla's routinely break apart trees to get at the tasty center and they have a stronger bite than a grizzly bear, as they eat very tough shrubbery. So those tree limbs would be torn to pieces, bitten in twain and it'd it pummel-pounded into mush, just how gorilla's fight.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
You're kinda loco, holmes.

Yes.

But that's irrelevant to what I've said in here. Tree isn't winning any of the fights, doesn't have what it takes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes.

But that's irrelevant to what I've said in here. Tree isn't winning any of the fights, doesn't have what it takes.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Crazy kinda loco.

Is this your way of saying: "okay, the Tree can't win here; I was wrong and I realize it now. Thank you yet again for showing me my folly, Robtard."

Originally posted by Robtard
Is this your way of saying: "okay, the Tree can't win here; I was wrong and I realize it now. Thank you yet again for showing me my folly, Robtard."

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No, this is me saying "Tired of discussing it, we'll go round and round baby right round" for days about it."

Concession accepted.

Originally posted by Robtard
Concession accepted.

Careful, your chip is showing.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Wasn't a concession, babe, it was me tiring of the conversation. Difference.

Careful, your chip is showing.

Dude, every point you brought up was countered. Tree isn't winning here.

Originally posted by Robtard
Concession accepted.

He did the same thing to me in another thread. He was "done" and "tired", i.e: I've got no argument. He then ran to Google and came back three hours later with an argument. Proof that he's never "tired", just done.

That aside, I honestly don't get why he does it. "We'll go round and round.", no, we won't if you learn to accept when you're beaten and there's no more argument.

It only becomes circular because he makes it circular. Not because he's actually countering anything.

-AC

Originally posted by Robtard
Dude, every point you brought up was countered. Tree isn't winning here.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I like watching movies, oreos are one of my favorite junk-food pleasures and I have trouble accepting I was shown to be wrong.

🙂

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
K.

In all honesty, I'm civilly asking you...if "K" is the best you can do and you aren't going to concede to being wrong, why not just avoid replying?

-AC

Originally posted by Robtard
🙂

It happens, like a Leap Year.

Originally posted by Robtard
It happens, like a Leap Year.

It wasn't needed, really.

It's just classy to admit when you're beaten.

-AC