Originally posted by §P0oONY
Excepct for the fact that here everyone smokes it with tobacco. Making it as bad.I love the fact that people actually seem offended that I don't think it should be legalised. It's jusy my opinion and most governments seem to agree with me, So na, na, na, na, naaa, na.
Well, I guess people get offended by people thinking that their harmless activities should be outlawed thereby making them criminals for no reason.
I don't think most kids even want the stupid toys in happy meals, they want the food. It's not like the kids go out and buy the meal anyways, their parents do. Then when they get older they're fat and unhappy because they don't know how to eat healthy.
The law is pointless anyways. You don't have to buy a happy meal to get a toy. They can just get something else off the menu and get a toy from Walmart.
Originally posted by TKMi think they want the toys more than the food. if it didnt come with a toy children wouldnt be begging their parents to purchase them happy meals.
I don't think most kids even want the stupid toys in happy meals, they want the food. It's not like the kids go out and buy the meal anyways, their parents do. Then when they get older they're fat and unhappy because they don't know how to eat healthy.The law is pointless anyways. You don't have to buy a happy meal to get a toy. They can just get something else off the menu and get a toy from Walmart.
Originally posted by chomperx9
why dont they use toys to encourage children to purchase healthy food ?
Actually they sort of did, considering you still got the toy if you got a salad, some apple slices, and juice instead of the cheeseburger and fries.
I imagine that acknowledging that would have made it hard for the idiots making this law to blame the fast food joints though, so it was sort of ignored.
The law's beyond stupid anyway, and just one more reason I'm glad I don't live in California. Next thing you know, they'll try their hand at outlawing motor vehicles in an attempt to reduce the number of traffic accidents. It'd probably work, but it wouldn't be any less moronic.
Originally posted by chomperx9
i think they want the toys more than the food. if it didnt come with a toy children wouldnt be begging their parents to purchase them happy meals.
I don't know any child who begs their parents for happy meals, because of the toy. Some parents are just lazy and don't want to cook, so they buy thier kids child sized meals.
I guess my point is, to me, this law is suppose to be a way of helping parents say no to their children. They better just grow a backbone.
Re: happy meals ilegal
Originally posted by chomperx9
using toys to encourage children to purchase unhealthy food is ilegal in some counties now.http://news.yahoo.com/video/business-15749628/where-happy-meals-are-illegal-19362009
Another retarded idea created by hippie earth loving vegan parents. 👇
Originally posted by TKM
I don't know any child who begs their parents for happy meals, because of the toy. Some parents are just lazy and don't want to cook, so they buy thier kids child sized meals.I guess my point is, to me, this law is suppose to be a way of helping parents say no to their children. They better just grow a backbone.
Frankly I was always of the opinion that the toys have long just been an attempt for each fast food chain to compete with the other, rather than entice kids' parents to buy their children happy meals.
Soda companies do the same sort of thing with those promotional things that almost always seem to be going on. Chance to win music downloads, etc. It's just an attempt to get an edge over the competition, not necessarily to entice somebody to buy a 20oz bottle of soda.